Synthese

, Volume 178, Issue 2, pp 219–235

Foiling the Black Knight

Article
  • 127 Downloads

Abstract

Why is the academy in general, and philosophy in particular, not more involved in the fight against the creationist threat? And why, when a response is offered, is it so curiously ineffective? I argue, by using an analogy with the battle against the Black Knight from the movie Monty Python and the Holy Grail, that the difficulty lies largely in a failure to see the nature of the problem clearly. By modifying the analogy, it is possible to see both why large sections of the academy have remained unmoved and also why many of the reactions to the threat have been so unsuccessful. Finally, I offer some very broad suggestions as to how to modify our approach in light of this new perspective.

Keywords

Evolution Creationism Education Monty Python 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chapman, G., Cleese, J., Idle, E., & Jones, T. (1975). Monty python and the holy grail.Google Scholar
  2. Harris Poll # 52. (2005). Nearly two-thirds of U.S. adults believe human beings were created by god. Retrieved September 25, 2006, from Harris Interactive ebsite:http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=581.
  3. Kitcher P. (1983) Abusing science: The case against creationism. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Pennock R.T. (2000) Tower of Babel: The evidence against the new creationism. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Pennock R.T. (2001) Intelligent design creationism and its critics: Philosophical, theological and scientific perspectives. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Ruse M. (2005) The evolution-creation struggle. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Scott, E. C. (2000). The creation/evolution continuum. Retrieved April 7, 2009, from The National Center for Science Education website:http://ncseweb.org/creationism/general/creationevolution-continuum.
  8. Smith K.C. (2001a) Appealing to ignorance behind the cloak of ambiguity. In: Pennock R. (eds) Intelligent design, creationism and its critics: Philosophical, theological and scientific perspectives. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 705–736Google Scholar
  9. Smith K.C. (2001) Can intelligent design become respectable?. Reports of the National Center for Science Education 20(4): 40–43Google Scholar
  10. Sober E. (2000) Philosophy of biology (2nd ed.). Westview Press, Boulder, Co.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and ReligionClemson UniversityClemsonUSA

Personalised recommendations