Synthese

, Volume 178, Issue 2, pp 331–379

The non-epistemology of intelligent design: its implications for public policy

Article

Abstract

Intelligent design creationism (ID) is a religious belief requiring a supernatural creator’s interventions in the natural order. ID thus brings with it, as does supernatural theism by its nature, intractable epistemological difficulties. Despite these difficulties and despite ID’s defeat in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District (2005), ID creationists’ continuing efforts to promote the teaching of ID in public school science classrooms threaten both science education and the separation of church and state guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. I examine the ID movement’s failure to provide either a methodology or a functional epistemology to support their supernaturalism, a deficiency that consequently leaves them without epistemic support for their creationist claims. My examination focuses primarily on ID supporter Francis Beckwith, whose published defenses of teaching ID, as well as his other relevant publications concerning education, law, and public policy, have been largely exempt from critical scrutiny. Beckwith’s work exhibits the epistemological deficiencies of the supernaturally grounded views of his ID associates and of supernaturalists in general. I preface my examination of Beckwith’s arguments with (1) philosopher of science Susan Haack’s clarification of the established naturalistic methodology and epistemology of science and (2) discussions of the views of Beckwith’s ID associates Phillip Johnson and William Dembski. Finally, I critique the religious exclusionism that Beckwith shares with his ID associates and the implications of his exclusionism for public policy.

Keywords

Beckwith Intelligent design Creationism Epistemology Law Public policy Supernaturalism Naturalism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Vision. (2006). Creation to revelation: Connecting the dots (Brochure for 2006 worldview super conference, Toccoa, GA). Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://www.americanvision.org/downloads/WSC_06_Broch.pdf.
  2. Audi R. (2000). Religious commitment and secular reason. Cambridge University Press, New York Google Scholar
  3. Beckwith F.J. (1985). Baha’i. Minneapolis, Bethany House Google Scholar
  4. Beckwith, F. J. (1989a). Baha’i-Christian dialogue: Some key issues considered. Christian Research Journal, 11(3). Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://web.archive.org/web/20050306032826/http://www.equip.org/free/DB035.pdf.
  5. Beckwith F.J. (1989b). David Hume’s argument against miracles: A critical analysis. University Press of America, New York Google Scholar
  6. Beckwith F.J. (1993). Hume’s evidential/testimonial epistemology, probability and miracles. In: Radcliffe, E.S. and White, C.J. (eds) Faith in theory and practice: Essays on justifying religious belief, pp 117–140. Open Court, Chicago Google Scholar
  7. Beckwith F.J. (1997). History and miracles. In: Geivett, R.D. and Habermas, G.R. (eds) In defense of miracles: A comprehensive case for God’s action in history, pp 86–98. InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL Google Scholar
  8. Beckwith, F. J. (2000). Deconstructing liberal tolerance. Christian Research Journal, 22(3), 1–7. Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://web.archive.org/web/20040419144451/http://www.equip.org/free/DL104.pdf.
  9. Beckwith F. J. (2001). Mormon theism, the traditional Christian concept of God, and Greek philosophy: A critical analysis. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 44(4), 671–695. Retrieved September 8, 2007, from http://homepage.mac.com/francis.beckwith/LDSGreek.pdf.
  10. Beckwith, F. J. (2003a). Intelligent design in the schools: Is it constitutional? Christian Research Journal, 25(4), 1–9. Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://web.archive.org/web/20050209210129/http://www.equip.org/free/DI410.pdf.Google Scholar
  11. Beckwith F.J. (2003b). Law, Darwinism and public education: The establishment clause and the challenge of intelligent design. Rowman and Littlefield, New York Google Scholar
  12. Beckwith, F. J. (2003c, April 21). Philosophical problems with moral relativism, statement DA-241. Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://web.archive.org/web/20031207071052/www.equip.org/free/DA241.htm.
  13. Beckwith, F. J. (2003d). Public education, religious establishment, and the challenge of intelligent design. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, & Public Policy, 17(2), 461–519. Retrieved March 27, 2007, from http://homepage.mac.com/francis.beckwith/NDJLEPP.pdf.
  14. Beckwith, F. J. (2003e). Science and religion twenty years after McLean v. Arkansas: Evolution, public education, and the new challenge of intelligent design. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 26(2), 455–499. Retrieved March 27, 2007, from http://homepage.mac.com/francis.beckwith/HJLPP.pdf.
  15. Beckwith, F. J. (2004–2005). Rawls’s dangerous idea? Liberalism, evolution and the legal requirement of religious neutrality in public schools. Journal of Law & Religion, 20(2), 423–458. Retrieved March 27, 2007, from http://homepage.mac.com/francis.beckwith/Rawls.htm.Google Scholar
  16. Beckwith, F. J. (2005). Sects in the city: Mormonism and the philosophical perils of being a missionary faith. Southern Baptist Journal of Theology, 9(2), 14–30. Retrieved March 27, 2007, from http://www.sbts.edu/pdf/sbjt_2005Summer3.pdf.Google Scholar
  17. Beckwith F.J. (2006b). It’s the epistemology, stupid! Science, public schools and what counts as knowledge. In: Dembski, W.A. (eds) Darwin’s nemesis: Phillip Johnson and the intelligent design movement, pp 105–116. Downers Grove, IVP Academic, IL Google Scholar
  18. Beckwith, F. J. (2006b). Taking theology seriously: The status of the religious beliefs of judicial nominees for the federal bench. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, & Public Policy, 20(1), 455–471. Retrieved March 27, 2007, from http://homepage.mac.com/francis.beckwith/NDJLEPP2.pdf.
  19. Beckwith, F. J. (n.d.) Curriculum vitae. Retrieved September 7, 2007, from http://www3.baylor.edu/~Francis_Beckwith/cv.html.
  20. Beckwith, F. J., & Laycock, D. (2005, September 26). Is teaching intelligent design legal? Legal Affairs. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.legalaffairs.org/webexclusive/debateclub_id0905.msp#Tuesday.
  21. Beckwith, F. J., Mosser, C., Owen, P. (Eds.). (2002). The new Mormon challenge: Responding to the latest defenses of a fast-growing movement. Grand Rapids, MI, Zondervan Google Scholar
  22. Boston, R. (2002). If best-selling end-times author Tim LaHaye has his way, church-state separation will be ...left behind. Church & State, 55(2), 8–13. Retrieved September 7, 2007, from http://www.au.org/site/News2?abbr=cs_&page=NewsArticle&id=5601&security=1001&news_iv_ctrl=1072.
  23. Brauer, M., Forrest, B., & Gey, S. (2005). Is it science yet? Intelligent design creationism and the constitution. Washington University Law Quarterly, 83(1), 1–149. Retrieved November 20, 2006, from http://www.creationismstrojanhorse.com/BrauerForrestGeyWULQ.pdf.
  24. Brenner, L. (Ed.). (2004). Jefferson and Madison on separation of church and state. Fort Lee, NJ, Barricade Books Google Scholar
  25. California State Board of Education. (1990). Science framework for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento: CA Dept. of Education.Google Scholar
  26. California State Board of Education. (2004). Science framework for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento: CA Dept. of Education. Retrieved April 1, 2007, from the CA Dept. of Education website: http://www.cde.ca.gov/re/pn/fd/documents/science-framework-pt1.pdf.
  27. Carrier, R. (1999, 2005). Beckwith on historiography. Part 4A of review of Geivett, R. D. & Habermas, G. R. (Eds.). (1997). In defense of miracles: A comprehensive defense of God’s action in history. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press. Retrieved November 21, 2006, from http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/indef/4a.html.
  28. Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture. (2000). Fellow Francis Beckwith. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://web.archive.org/web/20000818193241/www.discovery.org/crsc/fellows/FrancisBeckwith/index.html.
  29. Center for Science and Culture. (2006). Francis J. Beckwith, fellow—CSC. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=43&isFellow=true.
  30. Center for Science and Culture. (2007). Fellows. Retrieved July 21, 2007, from http://www.discovery.org/csc/fellows.php.
  31. Clarkson, F. (1994). Christian reconstructionism: Theocratic dominionism gains influence. Public Eye, 8(1). Retrieved November 20, 2006, from http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v08n1/chrisre1.html.
  32. Clarkson, F. (2005). The rise of dominionism: Remaking America as a Christian nation. Public Eye, 19(3). Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v19n3/clarkson_dominionism.html.
  33. Coral Ridge Ministries. (2006). Experts. Darwin’s deadly legacy: The chilling impact of Darwin’s theory of evolution. Video documentary. Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://www.coralridge.org/darwin/experts.asp?ID=crm&ec=I1301.
  34. Craig, W. L., & Ehrman, B. D. (2006). Is there historical evidence for the resurrection of Jesus? A debate between William Lane Craig & Bart D. Ehrman. (Transcript of debate at College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA). Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.holycross.edu/departments/crec/website/resurrection-debate-transcript.pdf.
  35. Dembski W.A. (1989–1990). Scientopoly: The game of scientism. Epiphany: A Journal of Faith & Insight 10(1–2): 110–120Google Scholar
  36. Dembski W.A. (1998). Introduction: Mere creation. In: Dembski, W.A. (eds) Mere creation: Science, faith and intelligent design, pp 13–30. InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL Google Scholar
  37. Dembski W.A. (1999a). Intelligent design: The bridge between science and theology. InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL Google Scholar
  38. Dembski W.A. (1999b). Signs of intelligence: A primer on the discernment of intelligent design. Touchstone 12(4): 76–84 Google Scholar
  39. Dembski W.A. (2001). The task of apologetics. In: Dembski, W.A. and Richards, J.W. (eds) Unapologetic apologetics: Meeting the challenges of theological studies, pp 31–43. InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL Google Scholar
  40. Dembski, W. A. (2004, January 17). Intelligent design: Yesterday’s orthodoxy, today’s heresy (lecture given at Grace Valley Christian Center, Davis, CA). Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.desiginference.com/documents/2005.04.ID_Orthodoxy_Heresy.htm.
  41. Dembski W.A. and Richards J.W. (2001). Introduction: Reclaiming theological education. In: Dembski, W.A. and Richards, J.W. (eds) Unapologetic apologetics: Meeting the challenges of theological studies, pp 11–27. InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL Google Scholar
  42. Dick Staub interview: Phillip Johnson. (2002, December 3). Christianity Today. Retrieved March 27, 2007, from http://web.archive.org/web/20021217012248/http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2002/147/22.0.html.
  43. Discovery Institute. (1998). The wedge (fundraising memo for the Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture). Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.seattleweekly.com/news/0605/discovery-wedge.php.
  44. Discovery Institute. (n.d.). About discovery: How Discovery Institute functions. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.discovery.org/aboutFunctions.php.
  45. Downey, R. (2006, February 1). Discovery’s creation. Seattle Weekly. Retrieved on November 20, 2006, from http://www.seattleweekly.com/news/0605/discovery-darwin.php.
  46. Drake, T. (2007, June 3–9). He could no longer explain why he wasn’t a Catholic. National Catholic Register. Retrieved on September 7, 2007, from http://ncregister.com/site/article/2772.
  47. Dworkin, R. (2006). Three questions for America. New York Review of Books, 53(14). Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19271.
  48. Edwards v. Aguillard 482 U.S. 578. (1987). Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=482&invol=578.
  49. Ehrman B.D. (2003a). Lost Christianities: The battles for scripture and the faiths we never knew. Oxford University Presss, New York Google Scholar
  50. Ehrman B.D. (2003b). Lost scriptures: Books that did not make it into the New Testament. Oxford University Press, New York Google Scholar
  51. Ehrman B.D. (2005). Misquoting Jesus: The story behind who changed the Bible and why. HarperSanFrancisco, New York Google Scholar
  52. Epiphany: A Journal of Faith & Insight. (1989–1990). Purpose statement. Special double issue: Darwin’s dream and the vision of Moses. 10(1–2).Google Scholar
  53. Epperson v. Arkansas, 393 U.S. 97. (1968). Retrieved April 7, 2009, from http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=393&invol=97.
  54. Forrest, B. (2000). Methodological naturalism and philosophical naturalism: Clarifying the connection. Philo, 3(2), 7–29. Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://www.creationismstrojanhorse.com/ForrestPhilo.pdf.
  55. Forrest, B. (2004). A defense of naturalism as a defense of secularism. In M. J. Cotter (Ed.), Sidney Hook reconsidered (pp. 69–115). Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://www.creationismstrojanhorse.com/Defense_of_Naturalism.pdf.
  56. Forrest B. and Gross P.R. (2004). Creationism’s trojan horse: The wedge of intelligent design. Oxford University Press, New York CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Forrest B. and Gross P.R. (2005). The wedge of intelligent design: Retrograde science, schooling and society. In: Koertge, N. (eds) Scientific values and civic virtues, pp 191–214. Oxford University Press, New York CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Freiler v. Tangipahoa Parish Board of Education 185 F.3d 337. (1999). 5th Cir. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/97/97-30879.CV0.wpd.pdf.
  59. Geisler N.L. and Anderson J.K. (1987). Origin science: A proposal for the creation-evolution controversy. Grand Rapids, MI, Baker Book House Google Scholar
  60. Gey, S. to B. Forrest. (2006, September 19). Personal communication.Google Scholar
  61. Goldberg, M. (2006). Saving secular society. In These Times, 30(6). Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/2649/.
  62. Goodstein, L. (2007, September 10). Prisons purging books on faith from libraries. New York Times, A1. Retrieved September 10, 2007, from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/10/us/10prison.html.
  63. Gross P.R. (2006). Nuance and honor: Religion versus science. In: De Waal, C. (eds) Susan Haack: A lady of distinctions: The philosopher responds to her critics, pp 191–198. Amherst, NY, Prometheus Books Google Scholar
  64. Groothuis, D. (2007, May 5). Posted comment on Right reason: The weblog for conservative philosophers (response to Beckwith, F. [2007, May 5]. My return to the Catholic Church. Right Reason). Retrieved September 7, 2007, from http://rightreason.ektopos.com/archives/2007/05/my_return_to_th.html.
  65. Haack S. (2004). Point of honor: On science and religion. Skeptical Inquirer 28(2): 56–62 Google Scholar
  66. Hume D. (1955). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Macmillan, New York Google Scholar
  67. IDEA (Intelligent Design and Evolution Awareness) Center. (2002). The IDEA center advisory board. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://web.archive.org/web/20020302114601/ideacenteronline.org/advisoryboard.htm.
  68. IDEA (Intelligent Design and Evolution Awareness) Center. (2006). Corrections and comments to statements made about the IDEA Center in Creationism’s Trojan Horse. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1129#five.
  69. Institute for First Amendment Studies. (n.d.). Council for National Policy (unofficial information page): 1998 membership by name. Retrieved November 20, 2006, from http://www.publiceye.org/ifas/cnp/name98.html.
  70. Johnson P.E. (1991). Darwin on trial. Regnery Gateway, Washington, DC Google Scholar
  71. Johnson, P. E. (1994, September–October). Is God unconstitutional? Real Issue. Retrieved on November 19, 2006, from http://www.leaderu.com/real/ri9403/johnson.html.
  72. Johnson, P. E. (1996, August 31). Starting a conversation about evolution. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.arn.org/docs/johnson/ratzsch.htm.
  73. Johnson, P. E. (1999a). Evolution and naturalism: Why it matters (speech presented at the January 1999 meeting of the Council for National Policy). Retrieved on November 19, 2006, from http://www.policycounsel.org/18856/41032.html.
  74. Johnson, P. E. (1999b). How the evolution debate can be won. Truths that transform. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.coralridge.org/specialdocs/evolutiondebate.asp.
  75. Johnson P.E. (2000). The wedge of truth: Splitting the foundations of naturalism. InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL Google Scholar
  76. Johnson, P. E. (2001, April 16). The wedge: A progress report. Weekly Wedge Update. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.arn.org/docs/pjweekly/pj_wedgeprogress041601.htm.
  77. Johnson P.E. (2002). The right questions: Truth, meaning, & public debate. InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL Google Scholar
  78. Johnson, P. E. (2003, February 21). Interview by Hank Hanegraaf. Bible Answer Man [radio program].Google Scholar
  79. Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707. (2005). Retrieved April 7, 2009, from http://www.pamd.uscourts.gov/kitzmiller/kitzmiller_342.pdf.
  80. Knox, M. (2003, September 19). Dawson family protests Beckwith’s appointment to Baylor institute. Baptist Standard. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.baptiststandard.com/postnuke/index.php?module=htmlpages&func=display&pid=680&print=1.
  81. Latter Day Saints, Church of Jesus Christ of. (n.d.a). Is the church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints a Christian church? Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.mormon.org/question/faq/category/answer/0,9777,1601-1-56-16,00.html.
  82. Latter Day Saints, Church of Jesus Christ of. (n.d.b). Who is Jesus Christ? Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.mormon.org/learn/0,8672,810-1,00.html.
  83. Leaming, J., & Boston, R. (2004). Behind closed doors. Church & State, 57(9). Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.au.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=6949&abbr=cs_.
  84. Lerner, L. S. (1990). California’s new framework demands new science texts. Textbook Letter, 1(5). Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.textbookleague.org/15frmwk.htm.
  85. Louisiana ACLU. (2007, March 23). ACLU helps Mormon inmate gain access to religious materials while in Angola; lawsuit prompts settlement. Retrieved March 25, 2007, from http://laaclu.org/News/2007/Sanders_Settled_032307.html.
  86. LSP [Louisiana State Penitentiary] Annual Report. (2006). Retrieved March 25, 2007, from Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections website: http://www.corrections.state.la.us/lsp/ANNUALRPT2006.pdf.
  87. Meyer, S. C. (1986). Scientific tenets of faith. Perspectives on science & Christian faith, 38(1), 40–42. Retrieved March 24, 2007, from http://www.asa3.org/asa/PSCF/1986/JASA3-86Meyer.html.
  88. Meyer, S. C. (2004). The origin of biological information and the high taxonomic categories. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 117(2), 213–239. Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&id=549.
  89. National Center for Science Education. (2004, September 10). ID paper continues to attract scrutiny. Retrieved on November 19, 2006, from http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/news/2004/ZZ/331_id_paper_continues_to_attract__9_10_2004.asp.
  90. Neff, D. (2007, May 9). Q & A: Francis Beckwith. Christianity Today. Retrieved September 7, 2007, from http://www.christianitytoay.com/ct/2007/mayweb-only/119-33.0.html.
  91. Pennock, R. T. (2004). DNA by design? Stephen Meyer and the return of the God hypothesis. In W. A. Dembski & M. Ruse (Eds.), Debating design: From Darwin to DNA (pp. 130–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://www.msu.edu/~pennock5/research/papers/Pennock*DNAbyDesign.pdf.
  92. Plantinga A. (2001). Creation and evolution: A modest proposal. In: Pennock, R.T. (eds) Intelligent design creationism and its critics: Philosophical, theological and scientific perspectives, pp 779–791. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar
  93. Sandefur, T. (2006, September 6). The politically incorrect guide to Darwinism and intelligent design review: ID’s newspeak. Pandas’ Thumb. Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/print/2006/09/the_politically_legal.html.
  94. Scott E.C. (2004). Evolution vs. creationism: An introduction. Greenwood Press, Westport, CT Google Scholar
  95. Segraves v. California Board of Education. (1981). Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.geocities.com/Athens/1618/Segraves_vs._California.html.
  96. Southern Poverty Law Center. (2005a). A mighty army. Intelligence Report, 117. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?pid=869.
  97. Southern Poverty Law Center. (2005b). A might army: Summit ministries. Intelligence Report, 117. Retrieved March 30, 2007, from http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?pid=872#11.
  98. Stack, P. F. (2001, May 26). Mormon-Christian debate a philosophical conundrum. Salt Lake Tribune, C1. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.beliefnet.com/story/81/story_8179.html.
  99. Stokes, T. (2004). Intelligent design study appears. The Scientist, 5(1). Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://www.the-scientist.com/news/20040903/04/.
  100. Sugg, J. (2006). Warped worldview. Church & State, 59(7), 11–13. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.au.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=8314&abbr=cs_.
  101. Summit Ministries. (2009a). About Summit: Our world. Retrieved April 7, 2009, from http://www.summit.org/about/.
  102. Summit Ministries. (2009b). About Summit: Faculty bios. Retrieved April 7, 2009, from http://www.summit.org/about/.
  103. Washington University School of Law. (2005–2006). Admissions bulletin. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://law.wustl.edu/uploadedfiles/admissions/bulletin0506.pdf.
  104. Wasley, P., Bartlett, T., & Labi, A. (2006). The faculty: Peer review. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(32), 8. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://chronicle.com/free/v52/i32/32a00802.htm.
  105. Wells, J. (1996). Issues in the creation-evolution controversies. The World & I, 11(1), 294–305. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.worldandi.com/public/1996/january/ar6.cfm.
  106. Wells J. (2006). The politically incorrect guide to Darwinism and intelligent design. Regnery, Washington, DC Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SLU 10484HammondUSA

Personalised recommendations