Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

What anti-realism in philosophy of mathematics must offer


This article attempts to motivate a new approach to anti-realism (or nominalism) in the philosophy of mathematics. I will explore the strongest challenges to anti-realism, based on sympathetic interpretations of our intuitions that appear to support realism. I will argue that the current anti-realistic philosophies have not yet met these challenges, and that is why they cannot convince realists. Then, I will introduce a research project for a new, truly naturalistic, and completely scientific approach to philosophy of mathematics. It belongs to anti-realism, but can meet those challenges and can perhaps convince some realists, at least those who are also naturalists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Baker A. (2001) Mathematics, indispensability and scientific progress. Erkenntnis 55: 85–116

  2. Baker A. (2005) Are there genuine mathematical explanations of physical phenomena? Mind 114: 223–238

  3. Benacerraf P. (1973) Mathematical truth. Journal of Philosophy 70: 661–679

  4. Burgess J.P. (2004) Mathematics and bleak house. Philosophia Mathematica 12(3): 18–36

  5. Burgess J.P., Rosen G. (1997) A Subject with no object. Clarendon Press, Oxford

  6. Chihara C. (2005) Nominalism. In: Shapiro S. (eds) The oxford handbook of philosophy of mathematics and logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 483–514

  7. Colyvan M. (1999) Confirmation theory and indispensability. Philosophical Studies 96: 1–19

  8. Colyvan M. (2002) Mathematics and aesthetic considerations in science. Mind 111: 69–74

  9. Dummett M. (1973) The philosophical basis of intuitionistic logic. In: Benacerraf P., Putnam H. (eds) Philosophy of mathematics: Selected readings (Reprinted, 1983). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 97–129

  10. Field H. (1980) Science without numbers. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

  11. Field H. (1998) Which undecidable mathematical sentences have determinate truth values? In: Dales H.G., Oliveri G. (eds) Truth in mathematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  12. Goodman N., Quine W.V. (1947) Steps toward a constructive nominalism. Journal of Symbolic Logic 12: 105–122

  13. Hellman G. (2005) Structuralism. In: Shapiro S. (eds) The oxford handbook of philosophy of mathematics and logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 536–562

  14. Hoffman S. (2004) Kitcher, ideal agents, and fictionalism. Philosophia Mathematica 12(3): 3–17

  15. Lakoff G., Núñez R. (2000) Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. Basic Books, New York

  16. Leng M. (2002) What’s wrong with indispensability? Synthese 131: 395–417

  17. Leng M. (2005) Revolutionary fictionalism: A call to arms. Philosophia Mathematica (III) 13: 277–293

  18. Maddy P. (1997) Naturalism in mathematics. Clarendon Press, Oxford

  19. Maddy P. (2005a) Three forms of naturalism. In: Shapiro S. (eds) The oxford handbook of philosophy of mathematics and logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 437–514

  20. Maddy P. (2005b) Mathematical existence. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11: 351–376

  21. Melia J. (2000) Weaseling away the indispensability argument. Mind 109: 455–479

  22. Papineau D. (1993) Philosophical naturalism. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

  23. Renyi A. (1967) Dialogues on mathematics. Holden-Day, San Francisco

  24. Rosen G., Burgess J.P. (2005) Nominalism reconsidered. In: Shapiro S. (eds) The oxford handbook of philosophy of mathematics and logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 515–535

  25. Sober E. (1993) Mathematics and indispensability. The Philosophical Review 102: 35–57

  26. Yablo S. (2001) Go figure: A path through fictionalism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25(1): 72–102

  27. Yablo S. (2002) Abstract objects: A case study. Noûs 36: 220–240

  28. Ye, F. (2008a). Naturalism and abstract entities. Available online at http://sites.google.com/site/fengye63/.

  29. Ye, F. (2008b). On what really exist in mathematics. ibid.

  30. Ye, F. (2008c). Naturalism and objectivity in mathematics. ibid.

  31. Ye, F. (2008d). Naturalism and the apriority of logic and arithmetic. ibid.

  32. Ye, F. (2008e). The applicability of mathematics as a scientific and a logical problem. ibid.

  33. Ye, F. (2008f). Strict finitism and the logic of mathematical applications. ibid.

  34. Ye, F. (2008g). A strictly finitistic system for applied mathematics. ibid.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Feng Ye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ye, F. What anti-realism in philosophy of mathematics must offer. Synthese 175, 13–31 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9535-7

Download citation


  • Philosophy of mathematics
  • Anti-realism
  • Realism
  • Naturalism