Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

But what then am I, this inexhaustible, unfathomable historical self? Or, upon what ground may one commit empiricism?

  • 144 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

This essay examines the perspective from which Bas van Fraassen, in his book, The Empirical Stance, explains the project of empiricism. I argue that this perspective is a robustly transcendental perspective, which suggests that the tradition of empiricism lacks the resources to explain itself. I offer an alternative history of epistemic voluntarism in twentieth-century philosophy to the history van Fraassen himself provides, one that finds the novelty in van Fraassen’s own views to be precisely his reintroduction of the knowing mind into the tradition of analytic philosophy of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Carnap R. (1967) The logical structure of the world. University of California Press, Berkeley

  2. Friedman, M. (Ed.) (1999). Tolerance and analyticity in Carnap’s philosophy of mathematics. In Reconsidering logical positivism (pp. 198–233). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  3. Goodman N. (1951) The structure of appearance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

  4. Lakatos, I. (Ed.) (1978). History of science and its rational reconstructions. In The methodology of scientific research programmes (pp. 102–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  5. Popper K. (1972) Objective Knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  6. Richardson A. (1996) From epistemology to the logic of science. In: Giere R.N., Richardson A.W. (eds) Origins of logical empiricism. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 309–332

  7. Richardson A. (2005) “The tenacious, malleable, indefatigible, and yet, eternally modifiable will”: Hans Reichenbach’s knowing subject. Proceedings of Aristotelian Society 79(supplementary volume): 73–87

  8. Richardson A. (2006) Freedom in a scientific society: reading the context of Reichenbach contexts. In: Schickore J., Steinle F. (eds) Revisiting discovery and justification. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 41–54

  9. Teller P. (2004) What is a stance?. Philosophical Studies 121: 159–170

  10. van Fraassen B.C. (1980) The scientific image. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  11. van Fraassen B.C. (2002) The empirical stance. Yale University Press, New Haven

  12. van Fraassen B.C. (2004) Transcendence of the ego (the non-existent knight). Ratio 17(ns): 453–477

  13. Wittgenstein L. (1922) Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Routledge, London

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Alan Richardson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richardson, A. But what then am I, this inexhaustible, unfathomable historical self? Or, upon what ground may one commit empiricism?. Synthese 178, 143–154 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9523-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bas van Fraassen
  • Empiricism
  • Epistemic voluntarism
  • Transcendental philosophy