The Puzzle of the Hats is a betting arrangement which seems to show that a Dutch book can be made against a group of rational players with common priors who act in the common interest and have full trust in the other players’ rationality. But we show that appearances are misleading—no such Dutch book can be made. There are four morals. First, what can be learned from the puzzle is that there is a class of situations in which credences and betting rates diverge. Second, there is an analogy between ways of dealing with situations of this kind and different policies for sequential choice. Third, there is an analogy with strategic voting, showing that the common interest is not always served by expressing how things seem to you in social decision-making. And fourth, our analysis of the Puzzle of the Hats casts light on a recent controversy about the Dutch book argument for the Sleeping Beauty.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Arntzenius F. (2002) Reflections on sleeping beauty. Analysis 62.2: 53–62
Banks J.S. (1999) Committee proposals and restrictive rules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96(14): 8295–8300
Bovens, L., & Rabinowicz, W. (2008). A Dutch book for group-decision making. In Proceedings of the formal sciences VI. Studies in Logic, College Publications (forthcoming).
Bradley D., Leitgeb H. (2006) When betting odds and credences come apart: More worries for Dutch book arguments. Analysis 66.2: 119–127
Draper K., Pust J. (2008) Diachronic Dutch books and sleeping beauty. Synthese 164(2): 281–289
Elga A. (2000) Self-locating belief and the sleeping beauty problem. Analysis 60: 143–147
Eriksson, L., & Rabinowicz, W. (2008). A Fundamental Problem for The Betting Interpretation, mimeo.
Feddersen T., Pesendorfer W. (1998) Convicting the innocent: The inferiority of unanimous jury verdicts under strategic voting. The American Political Science Review 92(1): 23–35
Feddersen T., Pesendorfer W. (1999) Elections, information aggregation, and strategic voting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96: 10572–10574
Hitchcock C. (2004) Beauty and the bets. Synthese 139: 405–420
Ramsey, F. (1926). Truth and probability, in Ramsey (1931) In R. B. Braithwaite (Ed.), The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays (Chap. VII, pp. 156–198). London: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.; New York: Harcourt, Brace and Campany. 1999 electronic edition. http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/ramseyfp/ramsess.pdf, accessed on 18 Jan 2008.
Robinson, S. (2001). Why mathematicians now care about their hat color. New York Times-Science, 10 April. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C00EFDB1E3EF933A25757C0A9679C8B63.
Our Puzzle of the Hats is inspired by a mathematical puzzle introduced in 1998 by Todd Ebert. See Robinson (2001).
About this article
Cite this article
Bovens, L., Rabinowicz, W. The puzzle of the hats. Synthese 172, 57 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9476-1
- Puzzle of the Hats
- Betting rates
- Sequential choice
- Strategic voting
- Dutch Book
- Sleeping Beauty
- Rational choice