Sleeping Beauty and shifted Jeffrey conditionalization
- 115 Downloads
In this paper, I argue for a view largely favorable to the Thirder view: when Sleeping Beauty wakes up on Monday, her credence in the coin’s landing heads is less than 1/2. Let’s call this “the Lesser view.” For my argument, I (i) criticize Strict Conditionalization as the rule for changing de se credences; (ii) develop a new rule; and (iii) defend it by Gaifman’s Expert Principle. Finally, I defend the Lesser view by making use of this new rule.
KeywordsSleeping Beauty De se belief Self-locating belief De se credence Updating rule
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Gaifman H. (1988) A theory of higher order probabilities. In: Skyrms B., Harper W.(eds) Causation, chance, and credence. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dortrecht, pp 191–220Google Scholar
- Jeffrey, R. (1984). Bayesianism with a human face. In J. Earman (Ed.), Testing scientific theories: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. X, pp. 133–156). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Jeffrey R. (1990) The logic of decision. University of Chicago press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Lewis, D. K. (1986). A subjectivist’s guide to objective chance. In R. Jeffrey (Ed.), Studies in inductive logic and probability (Vol. II, pp. 263–293). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Prior A.N. (2003) Papers on time and tense. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Rescher R., Urquhart A. (1971) Temporal logic. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar