Synthese

, Volume 166, Issue 3, pp 547–591

The interactivist model

Article

Abstract

A shift from a metaphysical framework of substance to one of process enables an integrated account of the emergence of normative phenomena. I show how substance assumptions block genuine ontological emergence, especially the emergence of normativity, and how a process framework permits a thermodynamic-based account of normative emergence. The focus is on two foundational forms of normativity, that of normative function and of representation as emergent in a particular kind of function. This process model of representation, called interactivism, compels changes in many related domains. The discussion ends with brief attention to three domains in which changes are induced by the representational model: perception, learning, and language.

Keywords

Interactivism Substance Process Emergence Normativity Hume Kim Normative function Representation Millikan Dretske Fodor Cummins Perception Learning Evolutionary epistemology Language Social ontology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitchison I.J.R. (1985). Nothing’s plenty: The vacuum in modern quantum field theory. Contemporary Physics 26(4): 333–391 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aitchison I.J.R. and Hey A.J.G. (1989). Gauge theories in particle physics. Adam Hilger, Bristol, England Google Scholar
  3. Allen, J. (2007). Stepping off the pendulum: Why only a thoroughly action based approach can fully transcend the nativist-empiricist epicycles and ground mind in the natural world. Interactivist Summer Institute, The American University of Paris, May 29, 2007.Google Scholar
  4. Belsey A. (1995). Matter. In: Honderich, T. (eds) The Oxford companion to philosophy, p. 539. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  5. Bickhard M.H. (1980). Cognition, convention and communication. Praeger Publishers, New York Google Scholar
  6. Bickhard M.H. (1987). The social nature of the functional nature of language. In: Hickmann, M. (eds) Social and functional approaches to language and thought, pp 39–65. Academic, New York Google Scholar
  7. Bickhard M.H. (1993). Representational content in humans and machines. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5: 285–333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bickhard M.H. (1995). Intrinsic constraints on language: Grammar and hermeneutics. Journal of Pragmatics 23: 541–554 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bickhard, M. H. (2000a). Information and representation in autonomous agents. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 65–75. http://www.elsevier.nl.
  10. Bickhard M.H. (2000b). Motivation and emotion: An interactive process model. In: Ellis R.D., Newton N. (eds). The Caldron of Consciousness. J. Benjamins, pp. 161–178Google Scholar
  11. Bickhard M.H. (2000c). Emergence. In: Andersen, P.B., Emmeche, C., Finnemann, N.O. and Christiansen, P.V. (eds) Downward causation, pp 322–348. University of Aarhus Press, Aarhus, Denmark Google Scholar
  12. Bickhard M.H. (2002). Critical principles: On the negative side of rationality. New Ideas in Psychology 20: 1–34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bickhard M.H. (2003a). Some notes on internal and external relations and representation. Consciousness & Emotion 4(1): 101–110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bickhard M.H. (2003b). An integration of motivation and cognition. In: Smith, L., Rogers, C. and Tomlinson, P. (eds) Development and motivation: Joint perspectives, pp 41–56. British Psychological Society, Monograph Series II, Leicester Google Scholar
  15. Bickhard M.H. (2003c). Variations in variation and selection: The ubiquity of the variation-and-selective retention ratchet in emergent organizational complexity, Part II: Quantum field theory. Foundations of Science 8(3): 283–293 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bickhard, M. H. (2004a). Process and emergence: Normative function and representation. Axiomathes–An International Journal in Ontology and Cognitive Systems, 14, 135–169. Reprinted from: Bickhard, M. H. (2003). Process and emergence: Normative function and representation. In J. Seibt (Ed.), Process theories: Cross disciplinary studies in dynamic categories (pp. 121–155). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  17. Bickhard M.H. (2004b). The social ontology of persons. In: Carpendale, J.I.M. and Muller, U. (eds) Social interaction and the development of knowledge, pp 111–132. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ Google Scholar
  18. Bickhard M.H. (2005). Consciousness and reflective consciousness. Philosophical Psychology 18(2): 205–218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bickhard M.H. (2006). Developmental normativity and normative development. In: Smith, L. and Voneche, J. (eds) Norms in human development, pp 57–76. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  20. Bickhard M.H. (2007). Language as an interaction system. New Ideas in Psychology 25(2): 171–187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bickhard, M. H. (forthcoming-a). Interactivism. In P. Calvo & J. Symons (Eds.), Routledge companion to the philosophy of psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Bickhard, M. H. (forthcoming-b). Interactive knowing: The metaphysics of intentionality. In R. Poli, J. Seibt, & J. Symons (Eds.), Theory and applications of ontology. Dordrecht: KluwerGoogle Scholar
  23. Bickhard, M. H. (forthcoming-c). Social ontology as convention. Topoi.Google Scholar
  24. Bickhard, M. H. (in preparation). The whole person: Toward a naturalism of persons—contributions to an ontological psychology.Google Scholar
  25. Bickhard M.H. and Campbell R.L. (1992). Some foundational questions concerning language studies: With a focus on categorial grammars and model theoretic possible worlds semantics. Journal of Pragmatics 17(5/6): 401–433 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Bickhard M.H. and Campbell R.L. (1996). Topologies of learning and development. New Ideas in Psychology 14(2): 111–156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Bickhard M.H. and Richie D.M. (1983). On the nature of representation: A case study of James Gibson’s theory of perception. Praeger Publishers, New York Google Scholar
  28. Bickhard, M. H., & Terveen, L. (1995). Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science: Impasse and solution. Elsevier Scientific.Google Scholar
  29. Brown H.R. and Harré R. (1988). Philosophical foundations of quantum field theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  30. Butchvarov P. (1999). Substance. In: Audi, R. (eds) The Cambridge dictionary or philosophy, p. 887. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  31. Campbell D.T. (1974). Evolutionary Epistemology. In: Schilpp, P.A. (eds) The philosophy of Karl Popper, pp 413–463. Open Court, LaSalle, IL Google Scholar
  32. Campbell D.T. (1990). Levels of organization, downward causation and the selection-theory approach to evolutionary epistemology. In: Greenberg, G. and Tobach, E. (eds) Theories of the evolution of knowing, pp 1–17. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ Google Scholar
  33. Campbell, R. J. (1992). Truth and historicity. Oxford.Google Scholar
  34. Campbell, R. J., & Bickhard, M. H. (in preparation). Physicalism, emergence, and downward causation.Google Scholar
  35. Campbell R.L. and Bickhard M.H. (1986). Knowing levels and developmental stages. Contributions to Human Development. Karger, Basel, Switzerland Google Scholar
  36. Cao T.Y. (1999). Conceptual foundations of quantum field theory. Cambridge, Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  37. Carlson N.R. (2000). Physiology of behavior (7th ed). Allyn and Bacon, Boston Google Scholar
  38. Chang, C. C., & Keisler, H. J. (1990). Model theory. North Holland.Google Scholar
  39. Chapman M. (1988). Constructive evolution: Origins and development of Piaget’s thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  40. Christensen W.D. and Bickhard M.H. (2002). The process dynamics of normative function. Monist 85(1): 3–28 Google Scholar
  41. Christopher J.C. and Bickhard M.H. (2007). Culture, self and identity: Interactivist contributions to a metatheory for cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology 13(3): 259–295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Clifton, R. (1996). Perspectives on quantum reality. Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  43. Cummins R. (1996). Representations, targets and attitudes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar
  44. Davies P.C.W. (1984). Particles do not exist. In: Christensen, S.M. (eds) Quantum theory of gravity, pp 66–77. Bristol England, Adam, Hilger Google Scholar
  45. Diessel H. (2007). Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use and diachronic change. New Ideas in Psychology 25(2): 108–127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Doyle J. (1985). Circumscription and implicit definability. Journal of Automated Reasoning 1: 391–405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Dretske F.I. (1988). Explaining behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar
  48. Fauconnier G. (1985). Mental spaces. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar
  49. Fodor J.A. (1981). The present status of the innateness controversy. In: Fodor, J. (eds) Representations, pp 257–316. MIT Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  50. Fodor J.A. (1987). A situated grandmother?. Mind and Language 2: 64–81 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Fodor J.A. (1990a). A theory of content and other essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar
  52. Fodor J.A. (1990b). Information and representation. In: Hanson, P.P. (eds) Information, language and cognition, pp 175–190. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver Google Scholar
  53. Fodor J.A. (1991). Replies. In: In; Loewer, B. and Rey, G. (eds) Meaninig in mind: Fodor and his critics, pp 255–319. Blackwell, Oxford Google Scholar
  54. Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. Oxford.Google Scholar
  55. Fodor, J. A. (2003). Hume variations. Oxford.Google Scholar
  56. Fodor J.A. and Pylyshyn Z. (1981). How direct is visual perception?: Some reflections on Gibson’s ecological approach. Cognition 9: 139–196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Gibson J.J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin, Boston Google Scholar
  58. Gibson J.J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In: Shaw, R. and Bransford, J. (eds) Perceiving, acting and knowing., pp 67–82. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ Google Scholar
  59. Gibson J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston Google Scholar
  60. Gibson R.F. (2004). Quine’s behaviorism cum empiricism. In: Gibson, R.F. (eds) The Cambridge companion to quine, pp 181–199. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Gill, M-L. (1989). Aristotle on substance. Princeton.Google Scholar
  62. Glock H.-J. (1996). Necessity and normativity. In: Sluga, H. and Stern, D.G. (eds) The Cambridge companion to wittgenstein, pp 198–225. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  63. Glock, H.-J. (2003). Quine and Davidson on language, thought, and reality. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  64. Goldberg A.E., Casenhiser D. and White T.R. (2007). Constructions as categories of language. New Ideas in Psychology 25(2): 70–86 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Graham, D. W. (1997). Heraclitus’ criticism of ionian philosophy. In C. C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Oxford studies in ancient philosophy (Vol. XV, pp. 1–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Graham D.W. (2006). Explaining the cosmos. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ Google Scholar
  67. Greenspan S. and Shanker S. (2007). The developmental pathways leading to pattern recognition, joint attention, language and cognition. New Ideas in Psychology 25(2): 128–142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Guthrie W.K.C. (1965). A history of greek philosophy II: The presocratic tradition from parmenides to democritus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  69. Hale B. and Wright C. (2000). Implicit definition and the a priori. In: Boghossian, P. and Peacocke, C. (eds) New essays on the a priori, pp 286–319. Oxford University Press, Oxford CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Halvorson H. and Clifton R. (2002). No place for particles in relativistic quantum theories?. Philosophy of Science 69(1): 1–28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Hawkins J.A. (2007). Processing typology and why psychologists need to know about it. New Ideas in Psychology 25(2): 87–107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Hilbert D. (1971). The foundations of geometry. Open Court, La Salle Google Scholar
  73. Huggett N. (2000). Philosophical foundations of quantum field theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51(supplement): 617–637 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Huggett N. and Weingard R. (1996). Critical review: Paul Teller’s interpretive introduction to quantum field theory. Philosophy of Science 63: 302–314 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Hume D. (1978). A treatise of human nature. Index by L. A. Selby-Bigge; Notes by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford.Google Scholar
  76. Hylton P. (1990). Russell, idealism and the emergence of analytic philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  77. Joas H. (1993). American pragmatism and German thought: A history of misunderstandings. In: Joas, H. (eds) Pragmatism and social theory, pp 94–121. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Google Scholar
  78. Kaplan D. (1979). On the logic of demonstratives. In: P. French, T. Uehling, Jr., H. Wettstein (eds) Contemporary perspectives in the philosophy of language, pp 401–412. Minnesota University Press, Minneapolis Google Scholar
  79. Kaplan D. (1989). Demonstratives: An essay on semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In: Allmog J., Perry J., Wettstein H. (eds) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, pp. 481–563Google Scholar
  80. Kim J. (1991). Epiphenomenal and supervenient causation. In D. M. Rosenthal (Ed.), The nature of mind (pp. 257–265). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Kim J. (1993). Supervenience and mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  82. Kim, J. (1998). Mind in a physical world. MIT.Google Scholar
  83. Kim J. (2005). Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ Google Scholar
  84. Kneale W. and Kneale M. (1986). The development of logic. Clarendon, Oxford Google Scholar
  85. Kolaitis, Ph. G. (1990). Implicit definability on finite structures and unambiguous computations. In Proc. 5th IEEE LICS (pp. 168–180).Google Scholar
  86. Kuhlmann M., Lyre H. and Wayne A. (2002). Ontological aspects of quantum field theory. World Scientific, River Edge, NJ Google Scholar
  87. Levine A. and Bickhard M.H. (1999). Concepts: Where fodor went wrong. Philosophical Psychology 12(1): 5–23 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Lewis D.K. (1969). Convention. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar
  89. McLaughlin B.P. (1992). The rise and fall of British emergentism. In: Beckermann, A., Flohr, H. and Kim, J. (eds) Emergence or reduction? Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism, pp 49–93. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin Google Scholar
  90. McLaughlin, B. P., & Bennett, K. (2005). Supervenience. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/supervenience/.
  91. Millikan R.G. (1984). Language, thought and other biological categories. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar
  92. Millikan R.G. (1993). White queen psychology and other essays for alice. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar
  93. Nunberg G. (1979). The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions. Linguistics and Philosophy 3(2): 143–184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. O’Regan J.K. and Noë A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(5): 939–1011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Orenstein, A. (2002). W. V. Quine. Princeton.Google Scholar
  96. Otero M.H. (1970). Gergonne on implicit definition. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30(4): 596–599 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Owens J. (1978). The Doctrine of being in the Aristotelian metaphysics (3rd ed). Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, Toronto Google Scholar
  98. Partee B. (1972). Opacity, coreference and pronouns. In: Davidson, D. and Harman, G. (eds) Semantics of natural language, pp 415–441. Reidel, Dordrecht Google Scholar
  99. Perry, J. (1993). The problem of the essential indexical. Oxford.Google Scholar
  100. Piaget J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Basic, New York Google Scholar
  101. Piaget J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. Columbia, New York Google Scholar
  102. Piaget, J. (2001). Studies in reflecting abstraction. (Ed. and transl. by Robert L. Campbell). Hove, England: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  103. Piattelli-Palmarini M. (1980). Language and learning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  104. Popkin R. (2003). The history of scepticism. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  105. Popkin R.H. and Stroll A. (2002). Skeptical philosophy for everyone. Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY Google Scholar
  106. Port R. (2007). How are words stored in memory? Beyond phones and phonemes. New Ideas in Psychology 25(2): 143–170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Quine W.V.O. (1966). Implicit definition sustained. In: Quine, W.V.O. (eds) The ways of paradox, pp 195–198. Random House, New York Google Scholar
  108. Reale G. (1987). From the origins to socrates. State University of New York Press, Albany Google Scholar
  109. Rescher N. (1980). Scepticism. Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, NJ Google Scholar
  110. Robinson, H. (2004). Substance. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/substance/.
  111. Ryder, L. H. (1985). Quantum field theory. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  112. Schelling T.C. (1963). The strategy of conflict. Oxford University Press, New York Google Scholar
  113. Schurz, G. (1997). The is-ought problem: An investigation in philosophical logic (Trends in Logic, V. 1). Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  114. Sciama D.W. (1991). The physical significance of the vacuum state of a quantum field. In: Saunders, S. and Brown, H.R. (eds) The philosophy of vacuum, pp 137–158. Clarendon, Oxford Google Scholar
  115. Shapiro, S. (1991). Foundations without foundationalism. Oxford.Google Scholar
  116. Shapiro, S. (1997). Philosophy of mathematics: Structure and ontology. Oxford.Google Scholar
  117. Shapiro S. (2005a). Higher order logic. In: Shapiro, S. (eds) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mathematics and logic, pp 751–780. Oxford University Press, Oxford CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Shapiro S. (2005b). The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mathematics and logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  119. Smith, B. C. (1987). The correspondence continuum. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, CSLI-87-71.Google Scholar
  120. Taylor, C. C. W. (1997). Anaxagoras and the atomists. In C. C. W. Taylor (Ed.), From the beginning to Plato (pp. 208–243). Routledge.Google Scholar
  121. Teller P. (1992). A contemporary look at emergence. In: Beckermann, A., Flohr, H. and Kim, J. (eds) Emergence or reduction? essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism, pp 139–153. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin Google Scholar
  122. Teller P. (1996). Wave and particle concepts in quantum field theory. In: Clifton, R. (eds) Perspectives on quantum reality, pp 143–154. Kluwer, Dordrecht Google Scholar
  123. Trusted J. (1999). The mystery of matter. St. Martin’s Press, New York Google Scholar
  124. Weinberg S. (1977). The search for unity, notes for a history of quantum field theory. Daedalus 106(4): 17–35 Google Scholar
  125. Weinberg S. (1995). The quantum theory of fields. Foundations (Vol 1). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  126. Weintraub R. (1997). The sceptical challenge. Routledge, London Google Scholar
  127. Wittgenstein Ludwig (1953). Philosophical investigations. Cambridge, Basil Blackwell Google Scholar
  128. Wright, M. R. (1997). Empedocles. In C. C. W. Taylor (Ed.), From the beginning to Plato (pp. 175–207). Routledge.Google Scholar
  129. Zee A. (2003). Quantum field theory in a nutshell. Princeton University Press, Princeton Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lehigh UniversityBethlehemUSA

Personalised recommendations