Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Forms of emergent interaction in General Process Theory

Abstract

General Process Theory (GPT) is a new (non-Whiteheadian) process ontology. According to GPT the domains of scientific inquiry and everyday practice consist of configurations of ‘goings-on’ or ‘dynamics’ that can be technically defined as concrete, dynamic, non-particular individuals called general processes. The paper offers a brief introduction to GPT in order to provide ontological foundations for research programs such as interactivism that centrally rely on the notions of ‘process,’ ‘interaction,’ and ‘emergence.’ I begin with an analysis of our common sense concept of activities, which plays a crucial heuristic role in the development of the notion of a general process. General processes are not individuated in terms of their location but in terms of ‘what they do,’ i.e., in terms of their dynamic relationships in the basic sense of one process being part of another. The formal framework of GPT is thus an extensional mereology, albeit a non-classical theory with a non-transitive part-relation. After a brief sketch of basic notions and strategies of the GPT-framework I show how the latter may be applied to distinguish between causal, mechanistic, functional, self-maintaining, and recursively self-maintaining interactions, all of which involve ‘emergent phenomena’ in various senses of the term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baas, N. (1992). Emergence, hierarchies, and hyperstructures. Paper presented at the Third Annual Artificial Life Conference, Santa Fe.

  2. Bickhard M. (2003) Process and emergence: Normative function and representation. In: Seibt J. (eds) Processes: Analysis and applications of dynamic categories. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 121–155

  3. Christensen W., Bickhard M. (2002) The process dynamics of normative function. The Monist 85: 3–28

  4. Cunningham B. (2001) The reemergence of ‘emergence’. Philosophy of Science 68: S62–S75

  5. Dowe P. (1992) Wesley Salmon’s process theory of causality and the conserved quantity theory. Philosophy of Science 59: 195–216

  6. Emmeche C., Køppe S., Stjernfelt F. et al (2000) Levels, emergence, and three versions of downward causation. In: Emmeche C. (eds) Downward causation. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, pp 8–24

  7. Hooker C.A. (2004) Asymptotics, reduction and emergence. British Journal for Philosophy of Science 55: 435–479

  8. Humphreys P. (1997) How properties emerge. Philosophy of Science 64: 1–17

  9. Kim J. (1993) Supervenience and mind: Selected philosophical essays. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  10. Machamer P., Darden L., Craver C. (2000) Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 67: 1–25

  11. Mourelatos A. (1978) Events, processes, and states. Linguistics and Philosophy 2: 415–434

  12. Mourelatos A. (1986) Quality, structure and emergence in later pre-socratic philosophy. In: Cleary J. (eds) Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy. Lanham, NY, pp 127–194

  13. Newman D. (1996) Emergence and strange attractrors. Philosophy of Science 63: 245–261

  14. Puntel L.B. (1993) The context principle, universals and primary states of affairs. American Philosophical Quarterly 30: 123–135

  15. Puntel L.B. (2006) Struktur und Sein. Tübingen, Mohr-Siebeck

  16. Quine W.V.O. (1985) Events and reification. In: LePore E., McLaughlin B. (eds) Actions and events. Blackwell, Perspectives on the philosophy of D. Davidson. Oxford, pp 162–172

  17. Rescher N. (1996) Process metaphysics. An introduction. SUNY-Press, Albany

  18. Rueger A. (2000) Robust supervenience and emergence. Philosophy of Science 67: 466–489

  19. Salmon W. (1997) Causality and explanation: A reply to two critiques. Philosophy of Science 64: 461–477

  20. Saywer K. (2004) The mechanisms of emergence. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34: 260–282

  21. Schroeder T. (2004) Functions from regulation. The Monist 87: 115–137

  22. Seibt, J. (1990). Towards process ontology: A critical study in substance-ontological premises. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, UMI-Publications.

  23. Seibt J. (1995) Individuen als Prozesse: Zur prozeß-ontologischen Revision des Substanzparadigmas. Logos 2: 303–343

  24. Seibt J. (1996) The myth of substance and the fallacy of misplaced concreteness. Acta Analytica 15: 61–76

  25. Seibt J. (1996) Non-countable individuals: Why ‘one’ and the ‘same’ is not one and the same. Southwest Philosophy Review 12: 225–237

  26. Seibt J. (1997) Existence in time: From substance to process. In: Faye J., Scheffler U., Urs M. (eds) Perspectives on time. Kluwer, Boston studies in philosophy of science. Dordrecht, pp 143–182

  27. Seibt, J. (2000a). The dynamic constitution of things. In J. Faye et al. (Eds.), Facts and events. Poznan studies in philosophy of science (pp. 241–279).

  28. Seibt J. (2000) Ontology as theory of categorial inference. In: Greimann D., Peres C. (eds) Wahrheit-Sein-Struktur. Auseinandersetzungen mit Metaphysik. Olms Verlag, Hildesheim, pp 272–297

  29. Seibt J. (2001) Formal process ontology. In: Welty C., Smith B. (eds) Formal ontology in information systems: Collected papers from the second international conference. ACM Press, Ogunquit, pp 333–345

  30. Seibt J. et al (2002) Quanta, tropes, or processes: On ontologies for QFT beyond the mythof substance. In: Kuhlmann M. (eds) Ontological aspects of quantum field theory. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 53–93–93

  31. Seibt, J. (eds) (2003) Process theories: Analysis and applications of dynamic categories. Kluwer, Dordrecht

  32. Seibt J. (2004) Free process theory: Towards a typology of occurrences. Axiomathes 14: 23–55

  33. Seibt J. (2004) General processes—a study in ontological category construction. Habilitationsschrift University of Konstanz, Germany

  34. Seibt J. (2005) Der Mythos der Substanz. In: Trettin K. (eds) Substanz—Neue Überlegungen zu einer klassischen Kategorie des Seienden. Klostermann, Frankfurt, pp 197–229

  35. Seibt, J. (2007). Beyond endurance and perdurance: Recurrent dynamics. In: Kanzian C. (eds.) Persistence. Frankfurt, Ontos-Verlag, pp 133–165

  36. Seibt, J. (2008). Mereology on processes (submitted).

  37. Sellars W. (1981) Foundations for a metaphysics of pure processes. The Monist 64: 3–90

  38. Simons P. (1987) Parts, a study in ontology. Clarendon, Oxford

  39. Smith T., Stevens G. (1996) Emergence, self-organization, and social interaction: Arousal dependent structure in social systems. Sociological Theory 14: 131–155

  40. Soto A., Sonnenschein C. (2006) Emergentism by default: A view from the bench. Synthese 151: 361–376

  41. Stout R. (1997) Processes. Philosophy 72: 119–127

  42. Tabery J. (2004) Synthesizing activities and interactions in the concept of a mechanism. Philosophy of Science 71: 1–15

  43. Vendler Z. (1967) Linguistics and philosophy. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

  44. Verkuyl H. (1978) Thematic relations and the semantic representation of verbs expressing change. Studies in Language 2: 199–233

  45. Vermaas P., Houkes W. (2003) Ascribing functions to technical artifacts: A challenge to the etiological account of functions. British Journal for Philosophy of Science 54: 261–289

  46. Whitehead A.N. (1929) Process and reality. Macmillan, New York

  47. Wimsatt W. (1986) Forms of aggregativity. In: Donegan A. (eds) Human nature and natural knowledge. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 259–293

  48. Wimsatt W. (1997) Aggregativity: Reductive heuristics for finding emergence. Philosophy of Science 64: S372–S384

  49. Woodward J. (2002) What is a mechanism? A counterfactual account. Philosophy of Science 69: S366–S377

  50. Zemach E. (1970) Four ontologies. Journal of Philosophy 23: 231–247

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Johanna Seibt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seibt, J. Forms of emergent interaction in General Process Theory. Synthese 166, 479 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9373-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Process ontology
  • Mereology
  • Emergence
  • Mechanism
  • Causation
  • Interaction
  • Selfmaintenance
  • Feedback