, Volume 166, Issue 3, pp 453–477 | Cite as

A process-based model for an interactive ontology



The paper proposes a process-based model for an ontology that encompasses the emergence of process systems generated by increasingly complex levels of organization. Starting with a division of processes into those that are persistent and those that are fleeting, the model builds through a series of exclusive and exhaustive disjunctions. The crucial distinction is between those persistent and cohesive systems that are energy wells, and those that are far-from-equilibrium. The latter are necessarily open; they can persist only by interaction with their environments. Further distinctions, developed by means of the notions of self-maintenance and error detection, lead to the identification of complex biological organisms that are flexible learners, some of which are self-conscious and form themselves into social institutions. This model provides a non-reductive model for understanding human beings as both embodied and yet emergent. In particular, it provides a way of characterizing action as ‘metaphysically deep’, not an ontological embarrassment within an otherwise physicalist world.


Ontology Process metaphysics Physicalism Emergence Self-maintenance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alon U., Surette M.G., Barkai N., Leibler S. (1999) Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 397(14): 168–171Google Scholar
  2. Bickhard M.H. (1998a) Levels of representationality. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 10: 179–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bickhard, M. H. (1998b). A process model of the emergence of representation. In G. L. Farre & T. Oksala (Eds.), Emergence, complexity, hierarchy, organization, selected and edited papers from the ECHO III Conference (pp. 263–270). Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, Mathematics, Computing and Management in Engineering Series No. 91, Espoo, Finland, August 3–7.Google Scholar
  4. Bickhard M.H. (2000) Autonomy, function and representation. Communication and Cognition, Special issue on Artificial Intelligence 17: 111–131Google Scholar
  5. Bickhard M.H. (2004) The social ontology of persons. In: Carpenter J.I.M., Muller U.(eds) Social interaction and the development of knowledge. Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ, pp 111–132Google Scholar
  6. Bickhard M.H. (2005) Consciousness and reflective consciousness. Philosophical Psychology 18(2): 205–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bickhard M.H. (2008) Are you social? The ontological and developmental emergence of the person. In: Müller U., Carpendale J.I.M., Budwig N., Sokol B.(eds) Social life and social knowledge. Taylor & Francis, New York, pp 17–42Google Scholar
  8. Capaldi N. (1991) Analytic philosophy and language. In: Harré R., Harris R.(eds) Linguistics and philosophy. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p 47Google Scholar
  9. Christensen W.D., Bickhard M.H. (2002) The process dynamics of normative function. The Monist 85(1): 3–28Google Scholar
  10. Christensen W.D., Hooker C.A. (2000) An interactivist-constructivist approach to intelligence: Self-directed anticipative learning. Philosophical Psychology 13: 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Christensen, W. D., & Hooker, C. A. (2001). Self-directed agenta. In J. McIntosh (Ed.), Naturalism, evolution and intentionality, Canadian Journal of Philosophy (Supp. Vol., pp. 19–52).Google Scholar
  12. Collier, J. D. (1998). Supervenience and reduction in biological hierarchies. Canadian Journal of Philosophy (Supp. Vol). Biology and Philosophy. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
  13. Davidson, D. (1980). The logical form of action sentences. In essays on actions and events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  14. Humphreys P. (1996) Aspects of emergence. Philosophical Topics 24: 53–70Google Scholar
  15. Jackson F. (1998) From metaphysics to ethics (p. 6, fn. 5). Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, J. (2002). Précis of Mind in a physical world. In Philosophy and phenomenological research (Vol. LXV, pp. 640–643).Google Scholar
  17. Kim J. (2005) Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 7Google Scholar
  18. Lewis, D. (1986a). Humean supervenience. In Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lewis D. (1986b) On the plurality of worlds. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Locke, J. (1975). Ed. P. H. Nidditch, An essay concerning human understanding (4th ed. of 1700). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  21. Loewer B. (2001) From physics to physicalism. In: Gillett C., Loewer B.(eds) Physicalism and its discontents. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 37Google Scholar
  22. Mourelatos Alexander P.D. (1978) Events, processes and states. Linguistics and Philosophy 2: 415–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roeper P. (1987) Principles of abstraction for events and processes. Journal of Philosophical Logic 16: 273–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Seibt J. (1996) The myth of substance and the fallacy of misplaced concreteness. Acta Analytica 15: 119–139Google Scholar
  25. Seibt J. (1997) Existence in time: From substance to process. In: Faye J., Scheffler U., Urs M.(eds) Perspectives on time, boston studies in philosophy of science. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 143–182Google Scholar
  26. Seibt, J. (2001). Formal process ontology. In FOIS-2001 Proceedings. ACM Digital Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Seibt J. (2003) Free process theory: Towards a typology of occurrings. In: Seibt J.(eds) Process theories: Crossdisciplinary studies in dynamic categories. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  28. Taylor B. (1997) Tense and continuity. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 199–220Google Scholar
  29. Wimsatt W.C. (1986) Forms of aggregativity. In: Donagan A., Perovich A., Wedin M.(eds) Human nature and human knowledge. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 259–291Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations