Advertisement

Synthese

, Volume 169, Issue 1, pp 51–73 | Cite as

A deflationary theory of reference

  • Arvid BåveEmail author
Article

Abstract

The article first rehearses three deflationary theories of reference, (1) disquotationalism, (2) propositionalism (Horwich), and (3) the anaphoric theory (Brandom), and raises a number of objections against them. It turns out that each corresponds to a closely related theory of truth, and that these are subject to analogous criticisms to a surprisingly high extent. I then present a theory of my own, according to which the schema “That S(t) is about t” and the biconditional “S refers to x iff S says something about x” are exhaustive of the notions of aboutness and reference. An account of the usefulness of “about” is then given, which, I argue, is superior to that of Horwich. I close with a few considerations about how the advertised theory relates to well-known issues of reference, the conclusions of which is (1) that the issues concern reference and aboutness only insofar as the words “about” and “refer” serve to generalise over the claims that are really at issue, (2) that the theory of reference will not settle the issues, and (3) that it follows from (2) that the issues do not concern the nature of aboutness or reference.

Keywords

Reference Aboutness Denotation Deflationism Disquotationalism Prosententialism Anaphor Horwich Field Brandom Externalism Empty names Definite descriptions Descriptions Russell 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Båve A. (2006). Deflationism: A use-theoretic analysis of the truth-predicate. Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis. Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm Google Scholar
  2. Båve A. (2008). A pragmatic defense of millianism. Philosophical Studies 138(2): 271–289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Båve, A. (forthcoming). Why is a truth-predicate like a pronoun? Philosophical Studies.Google Scholar
  4. Brandom R. (1994). Making it explicit. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar
  5. Brandom R. (2002). Explanatory vs expressive deflationism about truth. In: Schantz, R. (eds) What is truth?, pp 103–119. de Gruyter, Berlin Google Scholar
  6. David M. (1994). Correspondence and disquotation. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  7. Dummett M. (1973). Frege: The philosophy of language (2nd ed.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar
  8. Engel P. (2002). Truth. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal Google Scholar
  9. Field H. (1994). Deflationist views about meaning and content. Mind 103: 249–285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frege, G. (1884/1950). The foundations of arithmetic (trans: J. L. Austin). Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Geach, P. (1975). Names and identity. S. Guttenplan (Ed.), Mind and language: Wolfson college lectures 1974. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Grover D., Camp J. and Belnap N. (1975). A prosentential theory of truth. Philosophical Studies 27: 73–125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gupta A. (1993). A critique of deflationism. Philosophical Topics 21: 57–81 Google Scholar
  14. Hale B. (1987). Abstract objects. Basil Blackwell, Oxford Google Scholar
  15. Hale B. and Wright C. (Eds.) (2001). The reason’s proper study: Essays towards a Neo-Fregean philosophy of mathematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  16. Horwich P. (1998a). Meaning. Clarendon Press, Oxford CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Horwich P. (1998b). Truth (2nd ed.). Clarendon Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  18. Horwich P. (2005). Reflections on meaning. Clarendon Press, Oxford CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirkham R. (1992). Theories of Truth. MIT Press, Cambridge MA Google Scholar
  20. Leeds S. (1978). Theories of reference and truth. Erkenntnis 13: 111–130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mates B. (1952). Synonymity. In: Linsky, L. (eds) Semantics and the philosophy of language, pp 111–136. University of Illinois Press, Urbana Google Scholar
  22. Searle J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  23. Wilson W.K. (1990). Some reflections on the prosentential theory of truth. In: Dunn, J.M. and Gupta, A. (eds) Truth or consequences., pp 19–32. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht Google Scholar
  24. Wright C. (1983). Frege’s conception of numbers as objects. Aberdeen University Press, Aberdeen Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Filosofiska institutionenStockholms universitetStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations