It has been much debated whether Tractarian objects are what Russell would have called particulars or whether they include also properties and relations. This paper claims that the debate is misguided: there is no logical category such that Wittgenstein intended the reader of the Tractatus to understand his objects either as providing examples of or as not providing examples of that category. This is not to say that Wittgenstein set himself against the very idea of a logical category: quite the contrary. However, where Russell presents his logical variety of particulars and the various types of universal, and Frege presents his of objects and the various types of function, Wittgenstein denies the propriety of such a priori expositions. Wittgenstein envisages a variety of logical types of entity but insists that the nature of these types is something to be discovered only through analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Griffin N. (1964). Wittgenstein’s logical atomism. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Hacker P.M.S. (1989). Insight and illusion. Thoemmes, Bristol
Hintikka M.B., Hintikka J. (1986). Investigating Wittgenstein. Blackwell, Oxford
Ishiguro, H. (2001). The so-called picture theory: Language and the world. In Tractatus logico-philosophicus. In H. J. Glock (Ed.), Wittgenstein: A critical reader (pp. 26–46). Oxford: Blackwell.
Kenny A. (1984). The legacy of Wittgenstein. Blackwell, Oxford
Pears D. (1987) The false prison (vol 1). Clarendon Press, Oxford
Ramsey, F. P. (1990). In D.H. Mellor (Ed.), Philosophical papers. Cambridge: CUP.
Ricketts T. (1996). Pictures, logic, and the limits of sense in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. In: Sluga H., Stern D. (eds), The Cambridge companion to Wittgenstein. CUP, Cambridge, pp. 59–99
Russell B. (1984). The collected papers of Bertrand Russell. In: Eames E.R. (ed), Theory of knowledge, the 1913 manuscript (vol. 7). Allen and Unwin, London
Stenius E. (1960). Wittgenstein’s “Tractatus”: A critical exposition of its main lines of thought. Blackwell, Oxford
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). In G. E. M Anscombe & R. Rhees (Eds.), Philosophical investigations (trans: Anscombe, G. E. M). Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Tractatus logico-philosophicus (trans: Pears, D. & McGuinness, B.). London: Routledge.
Wittgenstein, L. (1979a). Notebooks 1914–1916 (trans: Anscombe, G. E. M), G. H. von Wright & G. E. M. Anscombe (Eds.), Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1979b). Ludwig Wittgenstein and the Vienna circle (trans: Schulte, J & McGuinness, B.), B. McGuinness (Ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Wittgenstein’s lectures, Cambridge 1930–1932, D. Lee (Ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1993). Philosophical occasions, J. Klagge & A. Nordmann (Eds.), Indianapolis: Hackett.
Wittgenstein, L. (1995). Cambridge letters, B. McGuinness & G. H. von Wright (Eds.), Oxford: Blackwell.
This research was conducted whilst holding a Jacobsen Research Fellowship at the University of London.
About this article
Cite this article
Johnston, C. Tractarian objects and logical categories. Synthese 167, 145–161 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9307-9
- Logical form