, Volume 165, Issue 1, pp 13–29 | Cite as

It’s in your nature: a pluralistic folk psychology



I suggest a pluralistic account of folk psychology according to which not all predictions or explanations rely on the attribution of mental states, and not all intentional actions are explained by mental states. This view of folk psychology is supported by research in developmental and social psychology. It is well known that people use personality traits to predict behavior. I argue that trait attribution is not shorthand for mental state attributions, since traits are not identical to beliefs or desires, and an understanding of belief or desire is not necessary for using trait attributions. In addition, we sometimes predict and explain behavior through appeal to personality traits that the target wouldn’t endorse, and so could not serve as the target’s reasons. I conclude by suggesting that our folk psychology includes the notion that some behavior is explained by personality traits—who the person is—rather than by beliefs and desires—what the person thinks. Consequences of this view for the debate between simulation theory and theory theory, as well as the debate on chimpanzee theory of mind are discussed.


Folk psychology Action theory Belief attribution Explanation Prediction Animal cognition Developmental psychology Social psychology Simulation theory Theory theory Chimpanzee mind Theory of mind 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andrews K. (2005). Chimpanzee theory of mind: Looking in all the wrong places? Mind and Language 20: 521–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews K. (2007). Critter psychology: On the possibility of nonhuman animal folk psychology. In: Hutto D., Ratcliffe M. (eds) Folk Psychology Reassessed. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Apperly I.A., Robinson E.J. (2003). When can children handle referential opacity? Evidence for systematic variation in 5- and 6-year old children’s reasoning about beliefs and belief reports. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 85: 297–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Apperly I.A., Robinson E.J. (1998). Children’s mental representation of referential relations. Cognition 67: 287–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartsch K., Wellman H. (1995). Children talk about the mind. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bretherton I., Beeghley M. (1982). Talking about internal states. Developmental Psychology 18: 906–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cain K.M., Heyman G.D., Walker M.E. (1997). Preschoolers’ ability to make dispositional predictions within and across domains. Social Development 6: 53–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell W.K., Sedikides C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology 3: 23–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carey S. (1985). Are children fundamentally different kinds of thinkers and learners than adults? In: Chipman S., Segal J., Glaser R. (eds) Thinking and learning skills (vol. 2) Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 485–517Google Scholar
  10. Churchland P. (1981). Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy 78: 67–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Darley J., Batson C. (1973). From Jerusalem to Jericho: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27: 100–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davidson D. (1963). Actions, reasons, and causes. Journal of Philosophy 60: 685–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunbar R. (1996). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunn J., Bretherton I., Munn P. (1987). Conversations about feeling states between mothers and their young children. Developmental Psychology 23: 132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flanagan O. (1984). Science of the mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  16. Franzoi S.L. (2003). Social psychology. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallagher S. (2006). The narrative alternative to theory of mind. In: Menary R. (eds) Radical enactivism: Intentionality, phenomenology, and narrative. John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  18. Gelman S.A. (1988). The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories. Cognitive Psychology 20: 65–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Godfrey-Smith P. (2005). Folk psychology as a model. Philosophers’ Imprint 5(6): 1–16Google Scholar
  20. Goldman A. (1989). Interpretation psychologized. Mind and Language 7:L 161–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldman A. (2006). Simulating minds. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Gordon R. (1995). Folk psychology as simulation. In: Davies M., Stone T. (eds) Folk psychology. Blackwell Publishers, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Gray C. (2000). Writing social stories with Carol Grey. Future Horizons, Arlington, TXGoogle Scholar
  24. Heider F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Heller K.A., Berndt T.J. (1981). Developmental changes in the formation and organization of personality attributions. Child Development 52: 683–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heyman G.D., Gelman S.A. (1999). The use of trait labels in making psychological inferences. Child Development 70: 604–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hursthouse R. (1991). Arational actions. Journal of Philosophy 88: 57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hutto D.D. (2004). The limits of spectatorial folk psychology. Mind and Language 19: 548–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Judd C.M., Ryan C.S., Park B. (1991). Accuracy in the judgment of in-group and out-group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61: 366–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kalish C.W. (2002). Children’s predictions of consistency in people’s actions. Cognition 84: 237–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Knobe J. (2003). Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis 63: 190–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kunda Z. (2002). Social cognition: Making sense of people. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  33. Lyons W. (2001). Matters of the mind. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Malle B.F. (2004). How the mind explains behavior: Folk explanations, meaning and social interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  35. Malle B.F. (2006). The relation between judgments of intentionality and morality. Journal of Cognition and Culture 6: 61–86Google Scholar
  36. Milgram S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67: 371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller J.G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46: 961–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miller P.H., Aloise P.A. (1989). Young children’s understanding of the psychological causes of behavior: A review. Child Development 60: 257–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nichols S., Stich S. (2003). Mindreading: An integrated account of pretence, self-awareness, and understanding other minds. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  40. Nisbett R.E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently  and why. The Free Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  41. Olson J.M., Roese N.J., Zanna M.P. (1996). Expectancies. In: Higins E.T., Kruglanski A.W. (eds) Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. Guilford Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Neill, D. (2004). Small talk and stories: Children’s developing models of the self and others. Cultural Biology: Evolution, development, and mind conference. Waterloo, ON: University of Waterloo, May 21–22.Google Scholar
  43. Park B. (1986). A method for studying the development of impressions of real people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 907–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pennington N., Hastie R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 16: 90–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rholes W., Newman L.S., Ruble D.N. (1990). Understanding self and other: Developmental and motivational aspects of perceiving persons in terms of invariant dispositions. In: Higgins E.T., Sorrentino R.M. (eds) Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (vol. 2). Guilford Press, New York, pp 369–407Google Scholar
  46. Rholes W., Ruble D.N. (1984). Children’s impressions of other persons: The effects of temporal separation of behavioral information. Child Development 57: 872–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ross L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In: Berkowitz L. (eds) Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 10). Academic Press, New York, pp 174–221Google Scholar
  48. Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Thagard P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brian Sciences 12: 435–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thagard P., Kunda Z. (1997). Making sense of people: Coherence mechanisms. In: Read S., Miller L.C. (eds) Connectionist models of social reasoning and social behavior. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  51. Vallone R.P., Griffin D.W., Lin S., Ross L. (1990). Overconfident prediction of future actions and outcomes by the self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58: 582–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wellman H., Cross D., Watson J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development 72: 655–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wimmer H., Perner J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition 13: 103–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Winter L., Uleman J. (1984). When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47: 237–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yuill N., Pearson A. (1998). The development of bases for trait attribution: Children’s understanding of traits as causal mechanisms based on desire. Developmental Psychology 34(3): 574–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations