The past hypothesis is that the entropy of the universe was very low in the distant past. It is put forward to explain the entropic arrow of time but it has been suggested (e.g. [Penrose, R. (1989a). The emperor’s new mind. London:Vintage Books; Penrose, R. (1989b). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 571, 249–264; Price, H. (1995). In S. F. Savitt (Ed.), Times’s arrows today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Price, H. (1996). Time’s arrow and Archimedes’ point. Oxford: Oxford University Press; Price, H. (2004). In C. Hitchcock (Ed.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of science. Oxford: Blackwell]) that it is itself in need of explanation. It has also been suggested that cosmic inflation could provide the explanation, but Price (2004) raises a serious objection to this suggestion, which has otherwise received very little attention in the philosophical literature. Price points out that the standard inflationary explanation involves a double standard: although the evolution of the universe described by the inflationary model seems natural from the standard temporal perspective it looks highly unnatural from the reversed temporal perspective. The main purpose of this paper is to propose a novel form of the inflationary explanation that avoids this objection. It is argued that the inflationary model would not involve a double standard (but would still explain the past hypothesis) if we construct the model with a global “boundary” condition instead of a conventional boundary condition: if we assume that the universe is as generic as possible overall, rather than as generic as possible at some given point (e.g. the Big Bang) as is assumed in the standard inflationary model. This novel form of the inflationary explanation is then compared with Price’s 1996 preferred explanation, a version of the so-called “Weyl hypothesis”.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Albert D.Z. (2000) Time and chance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts
Albrecht A. (2004) Cosmic inflation and the arrow of time. In: Barrow J.D., Davies P.C.W., Harper J.R., Harper C.L. (eds). Science and ultimate reality: Quantum theory, cosmology and complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 363–401
Callender C. (1997) What is ‘the problem of the direction of time’?. Philosophy of Science 64: S223–S234
Callender C. (1998) The view from no-when. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49: 135–159
Callender C. (2004a) Measures, explanations and the past: Should ‘special’ initial conditions be explained?. British Journal for Philosophy of Science 55: 195–217
Callender C. (2004b) There is no puzzle about the low entropy past. In: Hitchcock C. (eds). Contemporary debates in philosophy of science. Blackwell, Oxford
Cornish N., Spergel D., Starkman G. (1996) Does chaotic mixing facilitate Ω < 1 inflation?. Physics Review Letters 77: 215–218
Earman J., Mosterin J. (1999) A critical look at inflationary cosmology. Philosophy of Science 66(1): 1–49
Penrose R. (1989a) The emperor’s new mind. Vintage Books, London
Penrose R. (1989b) Difficulties with inflationary cosmology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 571: 249–264
Price H. (1995) Cosmology, time’s arrow and that old double standard. In: Savitt S.F. (eds). Time’s arrows today. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Price H. (1996) Time’s arrow and Archimedes’ point. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Price H. (2004) On the origins of the arrow of time: Why there is still a puzzle about the low entropy past. In: Hitchcock C. (eds). Contemporary debates in philosophy of science. Blackwell, Oxford
About this article
Cite this article
Ainsworth, P.M. Cosmic inflation and the past hypothesis. Synthese 162, 157–165 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9179-4
- Arrow of time
- Past hypothesis