, Volume 161, Issue 1, pp 67–88 | Cite as

Mathematics and conceptual analysis

  • Antony Eagle
Original Paper


Gödel argued that intuition has an important role to play in mathematical epistemology, and despite the infamy of his own position, this opinion still has much to recommend it. Intuitions and folk platitudes play a central role in philosophical enquiry too, and have recently been elevated to a central position in one project for understanding philosophical methodology: the so-called ‘Canberra Plan’. This philosophical role for intuitions suggests an analogous epistemology for some fundamental parts of mathematics, which casts a number of themes in recent philosophy of mathematics (concerning a priority and fictionalism, for example) in revealing new light.


Intuitions Platitudes Conceptual analysis Foundations of mathematics Fictionalism 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boolos G. (1971). The iterative conception of set. Journal of Philosophy 68, 215–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chalmers D. (1996). The conscious mind. New York, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Feigenson L., Carey S., Spelke E. (2002). Infant’s discrimination of number vs. continuous extent. Cognitive Psychology 44, 33–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Field H. (1980). Science without numbers. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Frege G. (1884). The foundations of arithmetic (translated by J. L. Austin). Oxford, BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  6. Gödel K. (1964). What is Cantor’s continuum problem?. In: Benacerraf P., Putnam H.(eds) Philosophy of mathematics: Selected readings. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 470–485Google Scholar
  7. Jackson F. (1998). From metaphysics to ethics: A defence of conceptual analysis. Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Kitcher P. (1978). The plight of the platonist. Noûs 12, 119–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kitcher P. (1980). A priori knowledge. Philosophical Review 89, 3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kripke S. (1980). Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Lakatos I. (1976). Proofs and refutations. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewis D. (1970). How to define theoretical terms. Journal of Philosophy 67, 427–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewis D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford, BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  14. Maddy P. (1997). Naturalism in mathematics. Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. McGee V. (1997). How we learn mathematical language. Philosophical Review 106, 35–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nolan, D. (1996). The credo of the Canberra planners. credo.htm.Google Scholar
  17. Nolan, D. (forthcoming). Platitudes and analysis. In D. Braddon-Mitchell, & R. Nola (Eds.), Naturalism and analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. O’Leary-Hawthorne J., Price H. (1996). How to stand up for non-cognitivists. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74,275–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parsons C. (1995). Platonism and mathematical intuition in Kurt Gödel’s thought. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 1, 44–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rosen G. (1990). Modal fictionalism. Mind 99, 327–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith M. (1994) The moral problem. Oxford, BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  22. Soames S. (2004). Reference and description. Princeton, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Stalnaker R. C. (1978). Assertion. In Context and content (pp. 78–95). Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Stalnaker R.C. (1996). Varieties of supervenience. Philosophical Perspectives 10, 221–242Google Scholar
  25. van Fraassen B.C. (1989). Laws and symmetry. Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  26. Williamson T. (2006). Conceptual truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 80.Google Scholar
  27. Yablo S. (2001). Go figure: A path through fictionalism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25, 72–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yablo S. (2005). The myth of the seven. In: Kalderon M.E.(ed) Fictionalism in metaphysics. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 88–115Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Exeter CollegeUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations