Advertisement

Synthese

, Volume 160, Issue 1, pp 123–153 | Cite as

Consciousness, context, and know-how

  • Charles WallisEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this paper I criticize the most significant recent examples of the practical knowledge analysis of knowledge-how in the philosophical literature: David Carr [1979, Mind, 88, 394–409; 1981a, American Philosophical Quarterly, 18, 53–61; 1981b, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 15(1), 87–96] and Stanley & Williamson [2001, Journal of Philosophy, 98(8), 411–444]. I stress the importance of know-how in our contemporary understanding of the mind, and offer the beginnings of a treatment of know-how capable of providing insight in to the use of know-how in contemporary cognitive science. Specifically, I claim that Carr’s necessary conditions for know-how fail to capture the distinction he himself draws between ability and knowing-how. Moreover, Carr ties knowing-how to conscious intent, and to an explicit knowledge of procedural rules. I argue that both moves are mistakes, which together render Carr’s theory an inadequate account both of common ascriptions of knowledge-how and of widely accepted ascriptions of knowledge-how within explanations in cognitive science. Finally, I note that Carr’s conditions fail to capture intuitions (heshares) regarding the ascription of know-how to persons lacking ability. I then consider the position advocated by Stanley & Williamson (2001), which seems avoid Carr’s commitments to conscious intent and explicit knowledge while still maintaining that “knowledge-how is simply a species of knowledge-that" (Stanley & Williamson, 2001, p. 411). I argue that Stanley and Williamson’s attempt to frame a reductionist view that avoids consciously occurrent beliefs during exercises of knowledge-how and explicit knowledge of procedural rules is both empirically implausible and explanatorily vacuous. In criticizing these theories I challenge the presuppositions of the most pervasive response to Ryle in the philosophic literature, what might be described as “the received view." I also establish several facts about knowing-how. First, neither conscious intent nor explicit representation (much less conscious representation) of procedural rules are necessary for knowing-how given the theory of cognition current in cognitive science. I argue that the discussed analyses fail to capture the necessary conditions for knowledge-how because know-how requires the instantiation of an ability and of the capacities necessary for exploiting an ability—not conscious awareness of purpose or explicit knowledge of rules. Second, one must understand knowledge-how as task-specific, i.e., as presupposing certain underlying conditions. Conceiving of know-how as task-specific allows one to understand ascriptions of know-how in the absence of ability as counterfactual ascriptions based upon underlying competence.

Keywords

Consciousness Know how Functional connection David Carr Stanley and Williamson Knowing that Task-specific ascription 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson J.R., Kline P.J., Beasley C.M. (1979). A general learning theory andits application to schema abstraction. In: G.H. Bower (eds) The psychology of learning and motivation. NewYork, Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Annett J. (1995). On knowing how to do things: A theory of motor imagery. Cognitive Brain Research 3, 65–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. The American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: Third edition-revised. Washington: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong D.M. (1968). A materialist theory of mind. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul LtdGoogle Scholar
  5. Bargh J., Chartrand T. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist 54, 462–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baseler H.,Morland A., Wandell B. (1999). Topographic organization of human visual areas in the absence of input from primary cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 19, 2619–2627Google Scholar
  7. Bayley P., Squire L. (2002). Medial temporal lobe amnesia: Gradual acquisition of factual information by nondeclarative memory. The Journal of Neuroscience 22(13): 5741–5748Google Scholar
  8. Bechtel W., Abrahamsen A. (1991). Connectionism and the mind: An introduction to parallel processing in networks. Cambridge, Blackwell PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Behrmann M., Marotta J., Gauthier I., Tarr M., McKeeff T. (2005). Behavioral change and its neural correlates invisual agnosia after expertise Training. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17, 554–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berry D., Broadbent D. (1984). On the relationship between task performance and associated verbalizable knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology 36A(2): 209–231Google Scholar
  11. Bliss, J., Ogborn, J. (1994). Force and motion from the beginning. Learning & Instruction, 4(1), 7–25 (tacit).Google Scholar
  12. Brehmer, B.,Hagafors, R., & Johansson, R. (1980). Cognitive skills in judgment: subjects’ ability to use information about weights, function forms, and organizing principles. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26(3), 373–385 (Expert judgement).Google Scholar
  13. Brown D. (1970). Knowing how and knowing that, what. In: Wood O.P., Pitcher G. (eds) Ryle. Garden City, Anchor BooksGoogle Scholar
  14. Bull R. (1979). Pupil dilation, sex of stimulus, and age and sex of observer. Perceptual and Motor Skills 49(1): 27–30Google Scholar
  15. Carr D.(1979). The logic of knowing how and ability. Mind 88, 394–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carr D. (1981a). Knowledge in practice. American Philosophical Quarterly 18, 53–61Google Scholar
  17. Carr D. (1981b). On mastering a skill. Journal of Philosophy of Education 15(1): 87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cermak L.S., Lewis R., Butters N., Goodglass H.(1973). Role of verbal mediation in performance of motor tasks by Korsak offpatients. Perceptual and Motor Skills 37, 259–262Google Scholar
  19. Chervinskaya K., Bekhterev V.(2000). Some methodological aspects of tacit knowledge elicitation. The Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12(1): 43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohen J.,Eichenbaum H., Deacedo B., Corkin S. (1985). Different memory systems underlying acquisition of procedural and declarative knowledge. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 444, 54–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cohen J.,Hunt C., Romine L., Wszalek T., Nash C.(1999). Hippocampal system and declarative (relational) memory: Summarizingthe data from functionalneuroimaging studies. Hippocampus 9, 83–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cohen J., Squire L. (1980). Preserved learning and retention of pattern–analyzing skill in amnesia: Dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. Science 210, 207–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cooke N. (1999). Knowledge elicitation. In: Durso F. (ed) Handbook of applied cognition. NewYork, NY John Wiley and Sons, pp. 479-509Google Scholar
  24. Corkin S. (1968). Acquisition of motor skill after bilateral medial temporal–lobe excision. Neuro psychologia 6(3): 255–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cummins R.(1983). The nature of psychological explanation. Cambridge, MITPressGoogle Scholar
  26. Dawes R., Faust D., Meehl P. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science 243(4899): 1668–1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. de Groot A., Gobet F. (1996). Perception and memory inchess. Heuristics of the professional eye. Assen, VanGorcumGoogle Scholar
  28. Doya K. (2000). Complementary roles of basal Ganglia and cerebellum in learning and motor Control." Current Opinionin Neurobiology 10(6): 732–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ellis N. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in second language acquisition 27(2): 305–352Google Scholar
  30. Emery N., Clayton N. (2005). Animal cognition. In: Bolhuis J.J., Giraldeau L.-A. (eds) The behavior of animals: Mechanisms, function, and evolution. Malden, MA, Blackwell PublishingGoogle Scholar
  31. Evans, J. (1988).The knowledge elicitation problem: A psychological perspective. Behavior and Information Technology,7(2), pp. 111–130.Google Scholar
  32. Faust D. (1989). Data integration in legal evaluations: Can clinicians deliver on their premises?. Behavioral Sciences andthe Law 7(4): 469–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ford D., Bergen N., Sterman J. (1998). Expert knowledge elicitation to improve formal and mental models. System Dynamics Review 14(4): 309–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gabrieli J. (1998). Cognitive neuroscience of human memory. Annual Review of Psychology 49, 87–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gabrieli J., McGlinchey–Berroth R., Carrillo M., Gluck M.,Cermak L., Disterhoft J. (1995). Intact delay–eyeblink classical conditioning in amnesia. Behavioral Neuroscience 109(5): 819–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ganzach Y. (2001). Nonlinear model of clinical judgement: Communal nonlinearity and nonlinear accuracy. Psychological Science 12(5): 403–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Geach P. (1957). Mental acts. NewYork, Humanities PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Geach P. (1966). Dr. Kenny on practical inference. Analysis 26, 76–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gilbert D. (1989).Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. In: Uleman J.S., Bargh J.A. (eds) Unintended thought. NewYork, Guilford Press, pp. 189-211Google Scholar
  40. Goldman, A. (2002). Simulation theory and mental concepts. Advances in Consciousness Research, 45.Google Scholar
  41. Gobet F., Simon H.A. (1996). The roles of recognition processes and look-ahead search in time-constrained expertproblem solving: Evidence from grand-master-level chess. PsychologicalScience 6, 381–381Google Scholar
  42. Gobet F., Simon H.A. (1998). Expertchess memory:Revisitingthechunking hypothesis. Memory 7, 52–55Google Scholar
  43. Grafton S.,Mazziotta J., Presty S., Friston K. (1992). Functional anatomy of human procedural learning determined with regional cerebral blood flow and PET. JournalofNeuroscience 12(7): 2542–2548Google Scholar
  44. Griffen D. (1992). Animal minds. Chicago, University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  45. Hansell, M. (1972). Case building behavior of the caddis-fly larvae. (Lepidostoma Hirtum Journal of Zoology) 167, 179–192Google Scholar
  46. Hansell M. (1984). Animal architecture and building behavior. London, LongmanGoogle Scholar
  47. Haugeland J. (1981). Semantic engines: An introduction to mind design. In: Haugeland J. (ed) Mind design. Cambridge, MIT/Bradford BooksGoogle Scholar
  48. Hill, K. (1984). Verbal reports of stimulus effects on learning: Introspection revisited. Journal of Research in Personality, 18(4), 480–490 (Intro).Google Scholar
  49. Hintikka J. (1974). Practicalvs. theoretical reason—an ambiguous legacy. In: Korner S. (eds) Practical reason. New Haven, YaleUniversity PressGoogle Scholar
  50. Hoffman, R., Shadbolt, N.,Burton, A., & Klein, G. (1995). Eliciting knowledge from experts: A methodological analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(2), 129–158 (Expert).Google Scholar
  51. Jacoby L., Witherspoon D. (1982). Remembering without awareness. Canadian Journal of Psychology 36(2): 300–324Google Scholar
  52. Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In: Kahneman D., Slovic P., A. Tversky (eds) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  53. Katzoff C. (1984). Knowing How. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 22, 61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kenny A.(1966). Practical inference. In Analysis 26, 65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Knowlton, B., & Squire, L. (1993). The learning of categories: Parallel memory systems for item memory and category–level knowledge. Science 262, 1747–1749 (Kh).Google Scholar
  56. Knowlton, B., Squire, L., & Gluck, M.(1994). Probabilistic classification in amnesia. Learning and Memory,1, 106–120 (Kh).Google Scholar
  57. Knowlton B.,Mangels J., Squire L.(1996). A neostriatal habit learning systemin humans. Science 273(5282): 1399–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Koethe J. (2002). Stanley and Williamson on knowing how. The Journal of Philosophy 99, 325–328Google Scholar
  59. Lovett M.C., Anderson J.R. (2005) Thinking as a production system. In: Holyoak K., Morrison R. (eds)Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. NY, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Luce G., Segal J. (1966). Sleep. NewYork, Coward McCannGoogle Scholar
  61. Mackie J.(1974). A reply to Jaakko Hintikka. In: Korner S. (eds) Practical reason. New Haven,Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  62. Mandler G. (1975). Consciousness, respectable, useful, and probably necessary. In: Solso R. (eds) Information processing and cognition: The Loyola syposium. Hillsdale, NJ, EarlbaumGoogle Scholar
  63. Marr D. (1981). Vision. NewYork, Freeman and CompanyGoogle Scholar
  64. Meehl P. (1954). Clinical vs statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and are view of the evidence. Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
  65. Mogenson G., Jones D., Yim C. (1980). From motivation to Action—Functional interface between the limbic system and the motor system. Progress in Neurobiology 14(2–3): 69–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Monchi O., Petrides M., Strafella P., Worsley K., Doyon J. (2006). Functional role of the basal ganglia in the planning and execution of action. Annals of Neurology 59(2): 257–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nisbett R., Wilson T. (1977). Telling more than wecan know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 84, 231–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pascual-Leone A., Grafman J., Hallett M. (1994). Modulation of cortical motor output maps during development of implicit and explicit learning. Science 263, 1287–1289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pearson D., Laird J. (2005). Incremental learning of procedural planning knowledge in challenging environment. Computational Intelligence 21(4): 414–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Perea M., Gotor A. (1997). Associative and semantic priming effects occur at very short stimulus–onset asynchronies in lexical decision and naming. Cognition 62, 223–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Perea M., Rosa E.(2002). The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task. Psychological Research 66, 180–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Poldrack R., Clark J.,Paré–Blagoev E., Shohamy D., Moyano J.,Myers C., Gluck M. (2001). Interactive memory systems in the human brain. Nature 414, 546–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Poldrack R., Sabb F.,Foerde K.,Tom S.,Asarnow R., Bookheimer S., Knowlton B. (2005). The neural correlates of motor skill automaticity. Journal of Neuroscience 25(22): 5356–5364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Quaney B., Rotella D., Peterson C., Cole K. (2003). Sensorimotor memory for fingertip forces: Evidence for a task-independent motor memory. Journal of Neuroscience 23(5): 1981–1986Google Scholar
  75. Quinton A. (1970). Ryle on perception. In: Wood O.P., Pitcher G. (eds) Ryle. GardenCity, Anchor BooksGoogle Scholar
  76. Reber P., Squire L.(2005) Encapsulation of implicit and explicit memory in sequence learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10(2): 248–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Reber A. (1989). Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118(3): 219–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Reber A., Lewis C. (1977). Implicit Learning: Ananalysis of the form and strucuture of a body of tacit knowledge. Cognition 5, 333–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rosenbloom P., Laird J., McDermott J., Newell A., Orciuch E. (1985). R1-Soar: An experiment in knowledge-intensive programming in a problem–solving architecture". IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 7, 561–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rumelhart D. (1989). The architecture of the mind: a connectionist approach. In: Posner M. (eds) Foundations of cognitive science. Cambridge, MITPressGoogle Scholar
  81. Ryle G. (1949). The concept of mind. NewYork, Barnesand NobleGoogle Scholar
  82. Saxe R.(2005). Against simulation: Theargumentfromerror. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 9, 174–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schacter D.(1989).On the relation between memory and consciousness: Dissociable interactions and conscious experience. In: Roediger H., Craik I. (eds) Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essaysin honorof EndelTulving. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  84. Schmand B., Kop W., Kuipers T., Jacquoline B. (1992). Implicit learning in psychotic patients. Schizophrenia Research 7(1): 55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schröder J.,Tittel A.,Stockert A., Karr M. (1996). Memory deficits in subsyndromes of chronic Schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 21(1): 19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Seger C. (1994). Implicit learning. Psychological Bulletin 115(2): 163–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Smeets W., Marin O., Gonzalez A. (2000). Evolution of the basal ganglia: New perspectives through a comparative approach. Journal of Anatomy 196(Pt4): 501–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Smith C.,Clark R., Manns J., Squire L.(2005). Acquisition of differential delay eyeblink classical conditioning is independent of awareness. Behavioral Neuroscience 119(1): 78–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Squire L. (2004). memory systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 82(3): 171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Stanley J., Williamson T. (2001). Knowing how. The Journal of Philosophy 98(8): 411–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sun R., Slusarz P., Terry C. (2005). The interaction of the explicit and the implicit in skill learning: Adual-process approach. Psychological Review 112(1): 159–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sternberg R., Horvath J. (1998). Cognitive conceptions of expertise and their relations to giftedness. In R. Friedman, & K. Rogers, (Eds.), Talent in context: Historical and social perspectives on giftedness (pp. 177–191).Google Scholar
  93. Stich S., Nichols S. (1997). Cognitive penetrability, rationality, and restricted simulation. Mind & Language 12, 297–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Stillings N.,Feinstein M.,Garfield J., Rissland E., Rosenbaum D.,Weisler S., Baker-Ward L. (1987). Cognitive science: An introduction. Cambridge, MITPressGoogle Scholar
  95. Thalen E.(1995). Time-scale dynamics and the development of an embodied cognition. In: Port R., Van Gelder T. (eds) Mind as motion. Cambridge, MITPressGoogle Scholar
  96. Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology 5, 207–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Unger P.(1967). Experience and factual knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy 64, 152–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. van Grop W., Altshuler L.,Theberge D., Mintz J. (1999). Declarative and procedural memory in bipolar disorder. Biological Pyschiatry 46(4): 525–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Vicari S., Bellucci S., Carlesimo G. (2001). Procedural learning deficit in children with Williams syndrome. Neuropsychologia 39(7): 665–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Waters A., Gobet F., Leyden G. (2002). Visuo-spatial abilities inchess players. British Journal of Psychology 30, 303–311Google Scholar
  102. Wells-Jensen S.,Wells-Jensen J., Belknap G. (2005). Changing the public’s attitude toward Braille: Agrass roots approach. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 99, 133–140Google Scholar
  103. Wiggins N., Hoffman P. (1968). Three models of clinical judgment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 73(1): 70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wilson T., Nisbett R. (1978). The accuracy of verbal reports about the effects of stimuli on evaluations and behavior. Social Psychology 41(2): 118–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Yamadori A.,Yoshida T., Mori E. (1996). Neurological basis of skill learning. Cognitive Brain Research 5(1–2): 49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyCalifornia State University, Long BeachLong BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations