Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Carnap’s dream: Gödel, Wittgenstein, and Logical, Syntax

Abstract

In Carnap’s autobiography, he tells the story how one night in January 1931, “the whole theory of language structure” in all its ramifications “came to [him] like a vision”. The shorthand manuscript he produced immediately thereafter, he says, “was the first version” of Logical Syntax of Language. This document, which has never been examined since Carnap’s death, turns out not to resemble Logical Syntax at all, at least on the surface. Wherein, then, did the momentous insight of 21 January 1931 consist? We seek to answer this question by placing Carnap’s shorthand manuscript in the context of his previous efforts to accommodate scientific theories and meta- linguistic claims within Wittgenstein’s Tractatus theory of meaning. The breakthrough of January 1931 consists, from this viewpoint, in the rejection of the Tractatus theory in favor of the meta-mathematical perspective of Hilbert, Gödel, and Tarski. This was not yet the standpoint of the published Logical Syntax, as we show, but led naturally to the “principle of tolerance” and thus to Carnap’s mature philosophy, in which the inconsistencies between this first view and the principle of tolerance, which survived into the published Syntax, were overcome.

References

  1. Awodey S., Carus A.W. (2001). Carnap, completeness, and categoricity: The Gabelbarkeitssatz of 1928. Erkenntnis, 54, 145–172

  2. Awodey S., Carus A.W. (2004). How Carnap could have replied to Gödel. In: Awodey S., Klein C. (eds), Carnap brought home. LaSalle, IL, Open Court, pp. 179–200

  3. Carnap R. (1930). Die alte und die neue Logik. Erkenntnis 1, 12–26

  4. Carnap R. (1931). Review of Kaila (1930). Erkenntnis 2, 75–77

  5. Carnap R. (1932a). Die physikalische Sprache als Universalsprache der Wissenschaft. Erkenntnis 2, 432–465

  6. Carnap R. (1932b). Über Protokollsätze. Erkenntnis 3, 215–228

  7. Carnap R. (1934). Logische Syntax der Sprache. Vienna, Springer

  8. Carnap R. (1936–7). Testability and meaning. Philosophy of Science, 3–4, 419–471, 1–40

  9. Carnap R. (1942). Introduction to semantics. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press

  10. Carnap R. (1950a). Logical foundations of probability. Chicago, University of Chicago Press

  11. Carnap R. (1950b). Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. Repr. in Meaning and necessity (2nd ed., pp. 205–221). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956

  12. Carnap R. (1963). Carnap’s intellectual autobiography and “The philosopher replies”. In: Schilpp P., (eds), The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (pp. 3–84, 859–1013). LaSalle, IL: Open Court.

  13. Carus A.W. (2004). Sellars, Carnap, and the logical space of reasons. In: Awodey S., Klein C. (eds), Carnap brought home: The view from Jena. LaSalle, IL, Open Court, pp. 317–355

  14. Carus A.W. (forthcoming). Carnap and twentieth-century thought: Explication as enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  15. Conant J. (2001). Two conceptions of Die Überwindung der Metaphysik: Carnap and early Wittgenstein. In: McCarthy T.G., Stidd S.C. (eds), Wittgenstein in America. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 13–61

  16. Creath R. (1990). The unimportance of semantics. PSA1990 2, 405–415

  17. Dummett M. (1981). Frege: Philosophy of language (2nd ed). London, Duckworth

  18. Floyd J. (2002). Number and ascriptions of number in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. In: Reck E. (eds), From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on early analytic philosophy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 308–352

  19. Friedman M. (2000). A parting of the ways: Carnap, Cassirer, Heidegger. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.

  20. Geach P. (1983). Wittgenstein’s Operator N. Analysis 41, 573–589

  21. Gödel K. (1931a). Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Repr. in K. Gödel, Collected Works, vol. 1. (pp. 144–195). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986

  22. Gödel K. (1931b). Diskussion zur Grundlegung der Mathematik. Repr. in K. Gódel, Collected Works, vol. 1. (pp. 200–205). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986

  23. Gödel K. (2003). Collected works, vol. 4; Correspondence A-G. Oxford, Oxford University Press

  24. Goldfarb W. (1997). Semantics in Carnap: A Rejoinder to Alberto Coffa. Philosophical Topics 25, 51–66

  25. Hacker P.M.S. (2003). Wittgenstein, Carnap, and the New American Wittgensteinians. Philosophical Quarterly 53, 1–23

  26. Hahn H. (1929). Empirismmus, Mathematik, und Logik. Repr. in H. Hahn, Empirismus, Logik, Mathematik (pp. 55–58). Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1988.

  27. Hilbert D., Ackermann W. (1928). Grundzüge der theoretischen Logik. Berlin, Springer

  28. Jeffrey R. (1994). Carnap’s Voluntarism. In D. Prawitz B. Skyrms, & D. Westerståhl (Eds.), Logic, methodology, and philosophy of science IX (pp. 847–866). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  29. Lavers G. (2004). Carnap, semantics, and ontology. Erkenntnis 60, 295–316

  30. Proops I. (2001a). The New Wittgenstein: A critique. European Journal of Philosophy 9, 375–404

  31. Putnam H. (1981). Reason, truth, and history. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

  32. Quine W.V.O. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. Repr. in Quine From a logical point of view (pp. 20–46). New York: Harper, 1953

  33. Quine W.V.O. (1963). Carnap and logical truth. In P. Schilpp (Ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (pp. 385–406). LaSalle, IL: Open Court.

  34. Reichenbach H. (1929). Ziele und Wege der physikalischen Erkenntnis, in Handbuch der Physik, vol. 4: Allgemeine Grundlagen der Physik. (pp. 1–80). Berlin: Springer.

  35. Ricketts T. (1996a). Pictures, logic, and the limits of sense in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. In: Sluga H., Stern D.G. (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 59–99

  36. Ricketts T. (1996b). Carnap: From logical syntax to semantics. In: Giere R., Richardson A., (eds), Origins of logical empiricism. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 231–250

  37. Rorty R.M. (eds) (1967). The linguistic turn: Essays in philosophical method. Chicago, University of Chicago Press

  38. Russell B. (1922). “Introduction” to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Repr. in L. Wittgenstein Logisch- philosophische Abhandlung (pp. 258–286) ed. by B. McGuinness & J. Schulte, Frankfurt a. M. 1998: Suhrkamp.

  39. Soames S. (1983). Generality, truth functions, and expressive capacity. Philosophical Review 92, 573–589

  40. Stadler F. (1997). Studien zum Wiener Kreis: Ursprung, Entwicklung und Wirkung des logischen Empirismus im Kontext. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

  41. Stein H. (1992). Was Carnap entirely wrong, after all?. Synthese 93, 275–295

  42. Sundholm G. (1992). The general form of the operation in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Grazer Philosophische Studien 42, 57–76

  43. Tarski A. (1932). Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den Sprachen der deduktiven Disziplinen. Akademischer Anzeiger der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse 69, 23–25

  44. Waismann F. (eds). (1967). Wittgenstein und der Wiener Kreis. Oxford, Blackwell

  45. Wittgenstein L. (1922). Tractatus Logic. Philosophicus. Repr. in L. Wittgenstein Logisch- philosophische Abhandlung (pp. 1–178) ed. by B. McGuinness & J. Schulte, Frankfurt a. M. 1998: Suhrkamp.

  46. Wittgenstein L. (1980). Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge 1930–32, from the notes of J. King & D. Lee J. King, ed. Totowa NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to S. Awodey.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.

About this article

Cite this article

Awodey, S., Carus, A.W. Carnap’s dream: Gödel, Wittgenstein, and Logical, Syntax . Synthese 159, 23–45 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9066-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Rudolf Carnap
  • Kurt Gödel
  • Ludwig Wittgenstein
  • Logical Syntax of Language
  • Vienna Circle