, Volume 157, Issue 3, pp 267–274 | Cite as

Guest editor’s introduction

  • Erik J. OlssonEmail author
Original Paper


Bayesian Network Crime Scene Impossibility Result Coherence Measure Impossibility Theorem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akiba K. (2000). Shogenji’s probabilistic measure of coherence is incoherent. Analysis, 60, 356–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonjour L. (1985). The structure of empirical knowledge. Cambridge Mass, Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Bovens L., Fitelson B., Hartmann S., Snyder J. (2002). Too odd (not) to be true: A reply to Erik J. Olsson. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 53, 539–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bovens L., Hartmann S. (2003). Bayesian epistemology. Oxford, Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Bovens L., Olsson E.J. (2000). Coherentism, reliability and Bayesian networks. Mind, 109, 685–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bovens L., Olsson E.J. (2002). Believing more, risking less: On coherence, Truth and non-trivial extensions. Erkenntnis, 57, 137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cross C.B. (1999). Coherence and truth conducive justification. Analysis, 59, 186–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dietrich F., Moretti L. (2005). On coherent sets and the transmission of confirmation. Philosophy of Science, 72(3): 403–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Douven I., Meijs W. (to appear), Measuring coherence. Synthese.Google Scholar
  10. Fitelson B. (2003). A probabilistic theory of coherence. Analysis, 63, 194–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glass D.H. (2002). Coherence, explanation, and Bayesian networks. In Proceedings of the Irish conference on AI and cognitive science. Lecture notes in AI (Vol. 2646, pp. 256–259). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Huemer M. (1997). Probability and coherence justification. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 35, 463–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Klein P., Warfield T.A. (1994). What price coherence?. Analysis, 54, 129–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klein P., Warfield T.A. (1996). No help for the coherentist. Analysis, 56, 118–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lewis C.I. (1946). An analysis of knowledge and valuation. LaSalle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  16. Merricks T. (1995). On behalf of the coherentist. Analysis, 55, 306–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Olsson E.J. (2001). Why coherence is not truth-conducive. Analysis, 61, 236–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Olsson E.J. (2002a). What is the problem of coherence and truth?. The Journal of Philosophy, 99, 246–272Google Scholar
  19. Olsson E.J. (2002b). Corroborating testimony, probability and surprise2. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 53, 273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olsson E.J. (2002c). Corroborating testimony and ignorance: A reply to Bovens, Fitelson, Hartmann and Snyder. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 53, 565–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Olsson E.J. (2005a). Against coherence: Truth, probability, and justification. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Olsson E.J. (2005b). The impossibility of coherence. Erkenntnis 63, 387–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Olsson E.J., Shogenji T. (2004). Can we trust our memories? C. I. Lewis’s Coherence Argument. Synthese, 144, 21–41Google Scholar
  24. Shogenji T. (1999). Is coherence truth-conducive?. Analysis, 59, 338–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shogenji T. (2001). Reply to Akiba on the probabilistic measure of coherence. Analysis, 61, 147–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Siebel M. (2004). On Fitelson’s measures of coherence. Analysis, 61, 229–35Google Scholar
  27. Thagard P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge Mass, MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations