Synthese

, Volume 149, Issue 3, pp 471–489 | Cite as

The Ungrounded Argument

Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, D.M. 1968A Materialist Theory of The MindRoutledgeLondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, D.M. 1997A World of States of AffairsCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackburn, S. 1990‘Filling In Space’Analysis506265Google Scholar
  4. Davidson D. 1970. ‘Mental Events’, in Essays on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Ellis, B. 2001Scientific EssentialismCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellis, B. 2002The Philosophy of Nature: A Guide to the New EssentialismCheshamAcumenGoogle Scholar
  7. Harré, R. 1986Varieties of RealismBlackwellOxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Isaacs, A. eds. 2000Oxford Dictionary of Physics4Oxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Lewis, D. 1986Philosophical Papers IIOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Lowe, E.J. 1982‘Laws, Dispositions and Sortal Logic’American Philosophical Quarterly194150Google Scholar
  11. Lowe, E.J. 1998The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and TimeClarendon PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Malzkorn, W. 2000‘Realism, Functionalism and the Conditional Analysis of Dispositions’The Philosophical Quarterly50452469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McKitrick, J. 2003‘The Bare Metaphysical Possibility of Bare Dispositions’Philosophy and Phenomenological Research66349369Google Scholar
  14. Martin, C.B. 1993

    ‘Power for Realists’

    Bacon, J.Campbell, K.Reinhardt, L. eds. Ontology, Causality and Mind: Essays in Honour of DM. Armstrong. KluwerDordrecht175186
    Google Scholar
  15. Martin, C.B. 1994‘Dispositions and Conditionals’The Philosophical Quarterly4418Google Scholar
  16. Martin, C.B., Heil, J. 1998‘Rules and Powers’Philosophical Perspectives12283312Google Scholar
  17. Mellor, D.H. 1974‘In Defence of Dispositions’Philosophical Review83157181Google Scholar
  18. Mill, J.S. 1843A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and InductiveLongmansGreenGoogle Scholar
  19. Molnar, G. 1999‘Are Dispositions Reducible?’The Philosophical Quarterly49817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Molnar G. (2003). Powers: A Study in Metaphysics, S. Mumford (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Mumford, S. 1998DispositionsOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Mumford, S. 1999‘Intentionality and the Physical: A New Theory of Disposition Ascription’The Philosophical Quarterly49215225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mumford, S.: 2003, ‘George Molnar and Powers’, in Molnar 2003.Google Scholar
  24. Place, U.T. 1996‘Intentionality as the Mark of the Dispositional’Dialectica5091120Google Scholar
  25. Prior, E., Pargetter, R., Jackson, F. 1982‘Three Theses about Dispositions’American Philosophical Quarterly19251257Google Scholar
  26. Ryle, G. 1949The Concept of MindHutchinsonLondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Simons, P. 2000‘Continuants and Occurrents’Proceedings of the Aristotelian SocietyLXXIV5975Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations