Advertisement

Synthese

, Volume 150, Issue 2, pp 247–280 | Cite as

Epistemology Factualized: New Contractarian Foundations for Epistemology

  • Ram NetaEmail author
Article

Abstract

Many epistemologists are interested in offering a positive account of how it is that many of our common sense beliefs enjoy one or another positive epistemological status (e.g., how they are warranted, justified, reasonable, or what have you). A number of philosophers, under the influence of Wittgenstein and/or J. L. Austin, have argued that this enterprise is misconceived. The most effective version of this argument is to be found in Mark Kaplan’s paper “Epistemology on Holiday”. After explaining what this criticism amounts to and why it is important, I then respond to it. My response is based upon, and is intended to display the explanatory power of, a contractarian account of our practice of epistemic appraisal.

Keywords

Explanatory Power Common Sense Effective Version Positive Account Epistemological Status 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alston, William 1985”Concepts of Epistemic Justification”The Monist685789Google Scholar
  2. Alston, William: 1988, ”The Deontological Conception of Epistemic Justification” in Tomberlin 1988.Google Scholar
  3. Alston, William. 1993”Epistemic Desiderata”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research5252751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin, J. L. 1962Sense and SensibiliaOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. BonJour, Laurence 1985The Structure of Empirical JustificationHarvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrne, Alex 2004‘How Hard Are Skeptical Paradoxes?’Nous38299325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavell, Stanley 1979The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and TragedyOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Chisholm, Roderick 1976Theory of Knowledge2Prentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke, Thompson 1972‘The Legacy of Skepticism’Journal of Philosophy6975469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, Stewart: 1988, ‘How to be an Fallibilist’ in Tomberlin 1988.Google Scholar
  11. Craig, Edward 1990Knowledge and the State of NatureClarendonOxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Dancy, Jonathan eds. 1979Papers on Language and LogicKeele University LibraryKeeleGoogle Scholar
  13. Davidson, Donald: 1986. ‘A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge’ in LePore 1986.Google Scholar
  14. DeRose, Keith 1995‘Solving the Skeptical Problem’Philosophical Review104151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeRose, Keith 1996‘Knowledge, Assertion, and Lotteries’Australasian Journal of Philosophy7456880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dretske, Fred 1971‘Conclusive Reasons’Australasian Journal of Philosophy49122Google Scholar
  17. DeRose, Keith 1981Knowledge and the Flow of InformationMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  18. Feldman, Richard, Conee, Earl 1985‘Evidentialism’Philosophical Studies481534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frege, Gottlob: 1980, The Foundations of Arithmetic, trans. J.L. Austin, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  20. French, PeterUehling, Theodore,Jr.Wettstein, Howard eds. 1981Midwest Studies in Philosophy VI: The Foundations of Analytic EpistemologyUniversity of Minnesota PressMinneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
  21. Grice, H. P.: 1957, ‘Meaning’ in Grice 1989.Google Scholar
  22. Grice,  1989Studies in the Way of WordsHarvard University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldman, Alvin 1986Epistemology and CognitionHarvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  24. Hahn, L. E. eds. 1998The Philosophy of P.F. StrawsonOpen CourtChicagoGoogle Scholar
  25. Harman, Gilbert 1973ThoughtPrinceton University PressPrinceton NJGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaplan, Mark 1991‘Epistemology on Holiday’Journal of Philosophy8813254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klein, Peter 1981Certainty: A Refutation of SkepticismUniversity of Minnesota PressMinneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
  28. Kornblith, Hilary 2002Knowledge and its Place in NatureClarendon PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Lehrer, Keith 1974KnowledgeOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Lehrer, Keith 1990Theory of KnowledgeWestview PressBoulder, COGoogle Scholar
  31. LePore, E. eds. 1986Truth and InterpretationBlackwellOxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Lewis, David 1979‘Scorekeeping in a Language Game’Journal of Philosophical Logic833959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lewis, David 1995‘Elusive Knowledge’Australasian Journal of Philosophy7454967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Long, Douglas 1992‘The Self-Defeating Character of Skepticism’Philosophy and Phenomenological Research526784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moore, G. E.: 1959a, ‘Certainty’ in Moore 1959c.Google Scholar
  36. Moore, G. E.: 1959b, ‘A Defence of Common Sense’ in Moore 1959c.Google Scholar
  37. Moore, G. E.: 1959c, Philosophical Papers, George Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  38. Nozick, Robert: 1981, Philosophical Explanations, Belknap, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  39. Owens, David 2000Reason without Freedom: The Problem of Epistemic NormativityRoutledgeLondon and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Plantinga, Alvin 1993aWarrant: The Current DebateOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  41. Plantinga, Alvin 1993bWarrant and Proper FunctionOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Pollock, John 1974Knowledge and JustificationPrinceton University PressPrincetonGoogle Scholar
  43. Putnam, Hilary 1981Reason, Truth, and HistoryCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Rieber, Steven 1998‘Knowledge and Contrastive Explanation’Nous32189204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Russell, Bertrand 1971Introduction to Mathematical PhilosophySimon and SchusterNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Slote, Michael: 1979, ‘Assertion and Belief’ in Dancy 1979.Google Scholar
  47. Strawson, P. F.: 1998, ‘Reply to Ernest Sosa’ in Hahn 1998.Google Scholar
  48. Stroud, Barry 1984The Significance of Philosophical ScepticismOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  49. Stroud, Barry 2000Understanding Human KnowledgeOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  50. Tomberlin, James 1988Philosophical Perspectives, Volume 2: EpistemologyRidgeviewAtascadero, CAGoogle Scholar
  51. Turner Piers: Manuscript, ‘A Defense of Epistemic Deontology’, Master’s Thesis at the University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill (2004).Google Scholar
  52. Unger, Peter 1975Ignorance: A Case for ScepticismOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. Vogel, Jonathan 1990‘Cartesian Skepticism and Inference to the Best Explanation’Journal of Philosophy8765866Google Scholar
  54. Williams, Bernard 1978Descartes: The Project of Pure EnquiryHammondsworthLondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Williams, Michael 1977Groundless Belief: An Essay on the Possibility of EpistemologyYaleNew Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  56. Williams, Michael 1991Unnatural Doubts: Epistemololgical Realism and the Basis of ScepticismBasil BlackwellOxfordGoogle Scholar
  57. Williamson, Timothy 2000Knowledge and Its LimitsOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  58. Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1969On CertaintyBasil BlackwellOxfordGoogle Scholar
  59. Wright Crispin: 1985, ‘Facts and Certainty’, Proceedings of the British Academy 429–72.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of North CarolinaCaldwell HallU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations