Cramer’s Transactional Interpretation and Causal Loop Problems
Tim Maudlin’s argument for the inconsistency of Cramer’s Transactional Interpretation (TI) of quantum theory has been considered in some detail by Joseph Berkovitz, who has provided a possible solution to this challenge at the cost of a significant empirical lacuna on the part of TI. The present paper proposes an alternative solution in which Maudlin’s charge of inconsistency is evaded but at no cost of empirical content on the part of TI. However, Maudlin’s argument is taken as ruling out Cramer’s heuristic “pseudotime” explanation of the realization of one transaction out of many.
KeywordsQuantum Theory Alternative Solution Empirical Content Causal Loop Loop Problem
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Arntzenius, Frank 1994‘Space-Like Connections’British Journal for the Philosophy of Science45201217Google Scholar
- Berkovitz, Joseph: 2002, ‘On Causal Loops in the Quantum Realm,’ in T. Placek and J. Butterfield (eds.), Non-locality and Modality, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Modality, Probability and Bell’s Theorems, Kluwer, pp. 233–255.Google Scholar
- Butterfield, Jeremy: 1989, ‘A Space–Time Approach to the Bell Inequality,’ in Cushing and McMullin (eds.), (1989). pp. 114–144.Google Scholar
- Butterfield, Jeremy 1992‘Bell’s Theorem: What It Takes’British Journal for the Philosophy of Science424183Google Scholar
- Cushing, J.McMullin, E. eds. 1989Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell’s TheoremUniversity of Notre Dame PressNotre DameGoogle Scholar
- Dummett, Michael 1954‘Can an Effect Precede Its Cause?’Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume382744Google Scholar
- Maudlin, Tim 2002Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity2BlackwellOxfordGoogle Scholar
- Price, Huw (1996). Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point. Oxford, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar