Synthese

, Volume 148, Issue 2, pp 401–423 | Cite as

Statues and Lumps: A Strange Coincidence?

Article

Abstract

Puzzles about persistence and change through time, i.e., about identity across time, have foundered on confusion about what it is for ‘two things’ to be have ‘the same thing’ at a time. This is most directly seen in the dispute over whether material objects can occupy exactly the same place at the same time. This paper defends the possibility of such coincidence against several arguments to the contrary. Distinguishing a temporally relative from an absolute sense of ‘the same’, we see that the intuition, ‘this is only one thing’, and the dictum, ‘two things cannot occupy the same place at the same time’, are individuating things at a time rather than absolutely and are therefore compatible with coincidence. Several other objections philosophers have raised ride on this same ambiguity. Burke, originating what has become the most popular objection to coincidence, argues that if coincidence is possible there would be no explanation of how objects that are qualitatively the same at a time could belong to different sorts. But we can explain an object’s sort by appealing to its properties at other times. Burke’s argument to the contrary equivocates on different notions of ‘cross-time identity’ and ‘the statue’. From a largely negative series of arguments emerges a positive picture of what it means to say multiple things coincide and of why an object’s historical properties explain its sort rather than vice versa – in short, of how coincidence is possible.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, David 1989A Combinatorial Theory of PossibilityCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, David 1997A World of States of AffairsCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, Lynne Rudder 1997‘Why Constitution is not Identity’The Journal of Philosophy94599621Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, Karen 2004‘Spatio-Temporal Coincidence and the Grounding Problem’Philosophical Studies118339371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burke, Michael B. 1980‘Cohabitation, Stuff and Intermittent Existence’Mind89391405Google Scholar
  6. Burke, Michael B. 1992‘Copper Statues and Pieces of Copper: A Challenge to the Standard Account’Analysis521217Google Scholar
  7. Burke, Michael B.: 1994, ‘Preserving the Principle of One Object to a Place: A Novel Account of the Relations among Objects, Sorts, Sortals, and Persistence Conditions’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54, 591–624. Reprinted in Rea (1997a).Google Scholar
  8. Chisholm, Roderick M. 1976Person and Object: A Metaphysical StudyOpen Court Publishing Co.La Salle, ILGoogle Scholar
  9. Doepke, Frederick: 1982, ‘Spatially Coinciding Objects’, Ratio 24, 45–60. Reprinted in Rea (1997a).Google Scholar
  10. Gallois, André 1990‘Occasional Identity’Philosophical Studies58203224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallois, André 1998Occasions of IdentityOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibbard, Allan: 1975, ‘Contingent Identity’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 4, 187–221. Reprinted in Rea (1997a).Google Scholar
  13. Heller, Mark 1990The Ontology of Physical Objects: Four-Dimensional Hunks of MatterCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Heller, Mark 2000‘Temporal Overlap is not Coincidence’The Monist83362380Google Scholar
  15. Heller, Mark 1992‘Things Change’Philosophy and Phenomenological Research52695704Google Scholar
  16. Johnston, Mark, 1992, ‘Constitution is not Identity’, Mind 101, 89–105. Reprinted in Rea (1997a).Google Scholar
  17. Jubien Michael (1996). ‘The Myth of Identity Conditions’, Philosophical Perspectives 10, Metaphysics 343–356Google Scholar
  18. Levey, Samuel 1997‘Coincidence and Principles of Composition’Analysis57110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewis, David: 1993, ‘Many, but Almost One’, in Keith Campbell, John Bacon, and Lloyd Reinhardt (eds.), Ontology, Causality, and Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Reprinted in Lewis (1993).Google Scholar
  20. Lewis, David 1986On the Plurality of WorldsBasil BlackwellOxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewis, David 1993Papers in Metaphysics and EpistemologyCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Lewis, David 1983Philosophical PapersOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Lewis, David 1988‘Rearrangement of Particles: Reply to Lowe’Analysis486572Google Scholar
  24. Lewis, David: 1976, ‘Survival and Identity’, in Amelie O. Rorty (ed.), The Identities of Persons, University of California Press. Reprinted in Lewis (1983).Google Scholar
  25. Lowe, E.J. 1989‘What is a Criterion of Identity?’Philosophical Quarterly39121Google Scholar
  26. Myro, George: 1986, ‘Identity and Time’, in Richard E. Grandy and Richard Warner (eds.), The Philosophical Grounds of Rationality, Clarendon Press, New York. Reprinted in Rea (1997a).Google Scholar
  27. Olson, Eric T. 2001‘Material Coincidence and the Indiscernibility Problem’The Philosophical Quarterly51337355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Perry, John 1970‘The Same F’The Philosophical Review79181200Google Scholar
  29. Quine W.V. (1969). ‘Ontological Relativity’, in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Rea, Michael C. 2000‘Constitution and Kind Membership’Philosophical Studies97169193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rea, Michael C. eds. 1997aMaterial Constitution: A ReaderRowman & LittlefieldNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Rea, Michael C. 1998‘Sameness without Identity: An Aristotelian Solution to the Problem of Material Constitution’RatioXI316328Google Scholar
  33. Rea, Michael C. 1997b‘Supervenience and Co-Location’American Philosophical Quarterly34367375Google Scholar
  34. Robinson, Denis 1985‘Can Amoebae Divide without Multiplying?’Australasian Journal of Philosophy63299319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Robinson, Denis 1982‘Re-Identifying Matter’The Philosophical Review91317341Google Scholar
  36. Sider, Theodore 1996‘All the World’s a Stage’Australasian Journal of Philosophy74433453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sider, Theodore 1999‘Global Supervenience and Identity across Times and Worlds’Philosophy and Phenomenological Research59913937Google Scholar
  38. Sider, Theodore 2000‘Recent Work on Identity over Time’Philosophical Books418189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Simons, Peter M. 1987Parts: A Study in OntologyClarendon PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. Sosa, Ernest 1999‘Existential Relativity’Midwest Studies in PhilosophyXXIII132143Google Scholar
  41. Sosa, Ernest: 1987, ‘Subjects, among Other Things’, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 1, Metaphysics, Ridgeview, Atascadero, CA. Reprinted in Rea (1997a).Google Scholar
  42. Thomson, Judith Jarvis 1983‘Parthood and Identity across Time’Journal of Philosophy80201220Google Scholar
  43. Thomson, Judith Jarvis 1998‘The Statue and the Clay’Noûs32149173Google Scholar
  44. Inwagen, Peter 1981‘The Doctrine of Arbitrary Undetached Parts’Pacific Philosophical Quarterly62123137Google Scholar
  45. Inwagen, Peter 1990Material BeingsCornell University PressIthacaGoogle Scholar
  46. White, Nicholas 1986‘Identity, Modal Individuation, and Matter in Aristotle’Midwest Studies in PhilosophyXI475494Google Scholar
  47. Wiggins, David 1968‘On Being in the Same Place at the Same Time’Philosophical Review779095Google Scholar
  48. Wiggins, David 1980Sameness and SubstanceHarvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  49. Zimmerman, Dean W. 1997‘Coincident Objects: Could a ‘Stuff Ontology’ Help?’Analysis571927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zimmerman, Dean W. 1995‘Theories of Masses and Problems of Constitution’Philosophical Review10453110Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of VermontBurlingtonU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations