Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The Problem with Token-reflexivity

Abstract

This essay presents an argument against the token-reflexive approach to the semantics for indexical languages. After some preliminary remarks in section one, sections two and three explain why some traditional arguments against token-reflexivity are ultimately ineffective. Section four puts forth a more persuasive argument, to the effect that token-reflexive views overgenerate with respect to results of analyticity. However, as section five explains, defenders of the alternative, type-oriented view have all too often wasted the advantage offered by their approach: the unmotivated, independent restriction of semantic evaluation to so-called ‘proper’ indexes is responsible for undesirable conclusions, similar to those to which token- reflexive theorists are committed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. D. Braun (1996) ArticleTitle‘Demonstratives and Their Linguistic Meaning’ Nous 30 145–173

  2. Crimmins, M.: 1995, ‘Contextuality, Reflexivity, Iteration, Logic’, in J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 9, Ridgeview.

  3. M. Garcia-Carpintero (1998) ArticleTitle‘Indexicals as Token-Reflexives’ Mind 107 529–563 Occurrence Handle10.1093/mind/107.427.529

  4. Garcia-Carpintero, M.: 2000, ‘Token-Reflexivity and Indirect Discourse’, in A. Kanamori (ed.), The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Vol. 6: Analytic Philosophy and Logic, Philosophy Documentation Center.

  5. D. Kaplan (1977) ‘Demonstratives’ J. Almog J. Perry H. Wettstein (Eds) Themes from Kaplan Oxford University Press Oxford

  6. D. Kaplan (1989) ‘Afterthoughts’ J. Almog J. Perry H. Wettstein (Eds) Themes from Kaplan Oxford University Press Oxford

  7. D. Kaplan (1990) ArticleTitle‘Words’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 64 IssueIDsuppl. 93–119

  8. J. Perry (1997) ‘Indexicals and Demonstratives’ C. Wright B. Hale (Eds) A Companion to the Philosophy of Language Blackwell Oxford

  9. Perry, J.: 2001, Reference and Reflexivity, CSLI Publications.

  10. Reichenbach, H.: 1947, Elements of Symbolic Logic, Free Press.

  11. P. Schlenker (2003) ArticleTitle‘A Plea for Monsters’ Linguistics and Philosophy 26 29–120 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1022225203544

  12. G. Vision (1985) ArticleTitle‘I Am Here Now’ Analysis 45 198–199

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Stefano Predelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Predelli, S. The Problem with Token-reflexivity. Synthese 148, 5–29 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-003-6194-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Preliminary Remark
  • Persuasive Argument
  • Semantic Evaluation
  • Traditional Argument
  • Independent Restriction