This essay presents an argument against the token-reflexive approach to the semantics for indexical languages. After some preliminary remarks in section one, sections two and three explain why some traditional arguments against token-reflexivity are ultimately ineffective. Section four puts forth a more persuasive argument, to the effect that token-reflexive views overgenerate with respect to results of analyticity. However, as section five explains, defenders of the alternative, type-oriented view have all too often wasted the advantage offered by their approach: the unmotivated, independent restriction of semantic evaluation to so-called ‘proper’ indexes is responsible for undesirable conclusions, similar to those to which token- reflexive theorists are committed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
D. Braun (1996) ArticleTitle‘Demonstratives and Their Linguistic Meaning’ Nous 30 145–173
Crimmins, M.: 1995, ‘Contextuality, Reflexivity, Iteration, Logic’, in J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 9, Ridgeview.
M. Garcia-Carpintero (1998) ArticleTitle‘Indexicals as Token-Reflexives’ Mind 107 529–563 Occurrence Handle10.1093/mind/107.427.529
Garcia-Carpintero, M.: 2000, ‘Token-Reflexivity and Indirect Discourse’, in A. Kanamori (ed.), The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Vol. 6: Analytic Philosophy and Logic, Philosophy Documentation Center.
D. Kaplan (1977) ‘Demonstratives’ J. Almog J. Perry H. Wettstein (Eds) Themes from Kaplan Oxford University Press Oxford
D. Kaplan (1989) ‘Afterthoughts’ J. Almog J. Perry H. Wettstein (Eds) Themes from Kaplan Oxford University Press Oxford
D. Kaplan (1990) ArticleTitle‘Words’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 64 IssueIDsuppl. 93–119
J. Perry (1997) ‘Indexicals and Demonstratives’ C. Wright B. Hale (Eds) A Companion to the Philosophy of Language Blackwell Oxford
Perry, J.: 2001, Reference and Reflexivity, CSLI Publications.
Reichenbach, H.: 1947, Elements of Symbolic Logic, Free Press.
P. Schlenker (2003) ArticleTitle‘A Plea for Monsters’ Linguistics and Philosophy 26 29–120 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1022225203544
G. Vision (1985) ArticleTitle‘I Am Here Now’ Analysis 45 198–199
About this article
Cite this article
Predelli, S. The Problem with Token-reflexivity. Synthese 148, 5–29 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-003-6194-y
- Preliminary Remark
- Persuasive Argument
- Semantic Evaluation
- Traditional Argument
- Independent Restriction