Set-Valued and Variational Analysis

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 113–133 | Cite as

A Class of Quadratic Programs with Linear Complementarity Constraints

Article

Abstract

We consider a class of quadratic programs with linear complementarity constraints (QPLCC) which belong to mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints (MPEC). We investigate various stationary conditions and present new and strong necessary and sufficient conditions for global and local optimality. Furthermore, we propose a Newton-like method to find an M-stationary point in finite steps without MEPC linear independence constraint qualification.

Keywords

Nonsmooth optimization Newton-like method Stationary points Mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints 

Mathematics Subject Classifications (2000)

90C30 90C33 90C26 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aziz, A.K., Stephens, A.B., Suri, M.: Nemerical methods for reaction-diffusion problems with non-differentiable kinetics. Numer. Math. 51, 1–11 (1988)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, X.: First order conditions for nonsmooth discretized constrained optimal control problems. SIAM J. Control Optim. 42, 2004–2015 (2004)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, X.: Finite difference smoothing solutions of nonsmooth constrained optimal control problems. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 26, 49–68 (2005)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, X., Matsunaga, N., Yamamoto, T.: Smoothing Newton method for nonsmooth Dirichlet problems. In: Fukushima, M., Qi, L. (eds.) Reformulation-Nonsmooth, Piecewise Smooth, Semismooth and Smoothing Methods, pp. 65–79. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, X., Mahmoud, S.: Implicit Runge-Kutta methods for Lipschitz continuous ordinary differential equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 46, 1266–1280 (2008)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, X., Nashed, Z., Qi, L.: Smoothing and semismooth methods for nondifferentiable operator equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 38, 1200–1216 (2000)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clarke, F.H.: Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis. Wiley, New York (1983)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cottle, R.W., Pang, J.-S., Stone, R.E.: The Linear Complementarity Problem. Academic Press, Boston, MA (1992)MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Horn, R.A., Johnson, C.R.: Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press (1985)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hu, J., Mitchell, J.E., Pang, J.S., Bennett, K.P., Kunapuli, G.: On the global solution of linear programs with linear complementarity constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 19, 445–471 (2008)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fukushima, M., Tseng, P.: An implementable active-set algorithm for computing a B-stationary point of the mathematical program with linear complementarity constriants. SIAM J. Optim. 12, 724–730 (2002)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fukushima, M., Tseng, P.: Erratum: An implementable active-set algorithm for computing a B-stationary point of the mathematical program with linear complementarity constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 17, 1253–1257 (2006)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mordukhovich, B.S.: Variational Analysis and Generalized Differentiation, I: Basic Theory. Grundlehren Series (Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences), Vol. 330. Springer (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mordukhovich, B.S.: Variational Analysis and Generalized Differentiation, II: Applications. Grundlehren Series (Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences), Vol. 331. Springer (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gabriel, S.A., Moré, J.J.: Smoothing of mixed complementarity problems. In: Ferris, M.C., Pang, J.-S. (eds.) Complementarity and Variational Problems: State of the Art, pp. 105–116. SIAM Publications, Philadelphia, PA (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kikuchi, F., Nakazato, K., Ushijima, T.: Finite element approximation of a nonlinear eigenvalue problem related to MHD equilibra. Japan J. Appl. Math. 1, 369–404 (1984)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu, G.S., Ye, J.J.: A merit function piecewise SQP algorithm for solving mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 135 (2007), Online FirstGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Luo, Z.Q., Pang, J.S., Ralph, D.: Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Outrata, J.V., Koc̆vara, M., Zowe, J.: Nonsmooth Approach to Optimization Problem with Equilibrium Constraints: Theory, Application and Numerical Results. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1998)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Qi, L.: Convergence analysis of some algorithms for solving nonsmooth equations. Math. Oper. Res. 18, 227–244 (1993)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Qi, L., Sun, J.: A nonsmooth version of Newton’s method. Math. Program. 58, 353–367 (1993)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rappaz, J.: Approximation of a nondifferentiable nonlinear problem related to MHD equilibria. Numer. Math. 45, 117–133 (1984)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scheel, H., Scholtes, S.: Mathematical programs with complementarity constraints: stationarity, optimality and sensitivity. Math. Oper. Res. 25, 1–22 (2000)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Scholtes, S.: Active set methods for inverse linear complementarity problems. Research Papers in Management Studies, University of Cambridge, No. 28 (1999)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Scholtes, S.: Convergence propreties of regularization schemes for mathematical programs with complementarity constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 11, 918–936 (2001)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ye, J.J.: Optimality conditions for optimization problems with complementarity constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 9, 374–387 (1999)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ye, J.J.: Necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 207, 350–369 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ye, J.J., Zhu, D.L., Zhu, Q.J.: Exact penalization and necessary optimality conditions for generalized bilevel programming problems. SIAM J. Optim. 2, 481–507 (1997)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied MathematicsThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations