Advertisement

The Journal of Supercomputing

, Volume 75, Issue 11, pp 7460–7478 | Cite as

Adaboost-based security level classification of mobile intelligent terminals

  • Feng Wang
  • Dingde Jiang
  • Hong Wen
  • Houbing SongEmail author
Article
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

With the rapid development of Internet of Things, massive mobile intelligent terminals are ready to access edge servers for real-time data calculation and interaction. However, the risk of private data leakage follows simultaneously. As the administrator of all intelligent terminals in a region, the edge server needs to clarify the ability of the managed intelligent terminals to defend against malicious attacks. Therefore, the security level classification for mobile intelligent terminals before accessing the network is indispensable. In this paper, we firstly propose a safety assessment method to detect the weakness of mobile intelligent terminals. Secondly, we match the evaluation results to the security level. Finally, a scheme of security level classification for mobile intelligent terminals based on Adaboost algorithm is proposed. The experimental results demonstrate that compared to a baseline that statistically calculates the security level, the proposed method can complete the security level classification with lower latency and high accuracy when massive mobile intelligent terminals access the network at the same time.

Keywords

Internet of Things Adaboost Edge server Mobile intelligent terminal Security level classification 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61571104), Sichuan Science and Technology Program (No. 2018JY0539), Key projects of the Sichuan Provincial Education Department (No. 18ZA0219), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. ZYGX2017KYQD170) and Innovation Funding (No. 2018510007000134). The authors wish to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments. Dr. Dingde Jiang and Dr. Hong Wen are corresponding authors of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Kim J, Jeon Y, Kim H (2016) The intelligent IoT common service platform architecture and service implementation. J Supercomput 74(9):4242–4260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boubiche DE (2018) Advanced industrial wireless sensor networks and intelligent IoT. IEEE Commun Mag 56(2):14–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dai W, Qiu M, Qiu L et al (2017) Who moved my data? Privacy protection in smartphones. IEEE Commun Mag 55(1):20–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee YK, Kim JN, Lim KS et al (2017) Secure mobile device structure for trust IoT. J Supercomput 2017(7):1–19Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Islam N, Das S, Chen Y (2017) On-device mobile phone security exploits machine learning. IEEE Pervasive Comput 16(2):92–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kraijak S, Tuwanut P (2015) A survey on IoT architectures, protocols, applications, security, privacy, real-world implementation and future trends. In: Proceedings of the WiCOM’15, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shi W, Cao J, Zhang Q et al (2016) Edge computing: vision and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J 3(5):637–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taleb T, Dutta S, Ksentini A et al (2017) Mobile edge computing potential in making cities smarter. IEEE Commun Mag 55(3):38–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang J, Hong Z, Zhang Y et al (2018) Enabling security-enhanced attestation with intel SGX for remote terminal and IoT. IEEE Trans Comput Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst 37(1):88–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Galdi C, Nappi M, Dugelay J et al (2018) Exploring new authentication protocols for sensitive data protection on smartphones. IEEE Commun Mag 56(1):136–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park KC, Shin DH (2017) Security assessment framework for IoT service. Telecommun Syst 64(1):193–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee L, Chen C (2016) The power of Smartphones. Multimed Syst 21(1):87–101MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang G, Song Q, Zhu X (2015) An improved data characterization method and its application in classification algorithm recommendation. Appl Intell 43(4):892–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jia Q, Guo L, Jin Z et al (2016) Privacy-preserving data classification and similarity evaluation for distributed systems. In: Proceedings of the ICDCS’16, pp 690–699Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cavalcanti K, Viana E, Lins F (2017) An integrated solution for the improvement of the mobile devices security based on the android platform. IEEE Lat Am Trans 15(11):2171–2176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Irwan D, Asnar Y, Hendradjaya B (2015) Confidentiality and privacy information security risk assessment for Android-based mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the ICoDSE’15, pp 1–6 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dong Z, Wu Y, Pei M et al (2015) Vehicle type classification using a semisupervised convolutional neural network. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 16(4):2247–2256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Deng Y, Ren Z, Kong Y et al (2017) A hierarchical fused fuzzy deep neural network for data classification. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 25(4):1006–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guo Y, Jia X, Paull D (2018) Effective sequential classifier training for SVM-based multitemporal remote sensing image classification. IEEE Trans Image Process 27(6):3036–3048MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ding X, Jiang T, Zou W (2017) A new method of dynamic gesture recognition using Wi-Fi signals based on Adaboost. In: Proceedings of the ISCIT’17, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jiang D, Wang W, Shi L et al (2018) A compressive sensing-based approach to end-to-end network traffic reconstruction. IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng 5(3):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jiang D, Huo L, Song H (2018) Rethinking behaviors and activities of base stations in mobile cellular networks based on big data analysis. IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng 1(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jiang D, Huo L, Li Y (2018) Fine-granularity inference and estimations to network traffic for SDN. PLoS ONE 13(5):1–23Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jiang D, Huo L, Lv Z et al (2018) A joint multi-criteria utility-based network selection approach for vehicle-to-infrastructure networking. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 19(10):3305–3319CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Astronautics and AeronauticUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChengduChina
  2. 2.Department of Electrical Computer, Software, and Systems EngineeringEmbry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityDaytona BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations