The Journal of Supercomputing

, Volume 73, Issue 8, pp 3579–3585 | Cite as

Passive secret disclosure attack on an ultralightweight authentication protocol for Internet of Things

Article

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) is a technology in which for any object the ability to send data via communications networks is provided. Ensuring the security of Internet services and applications is an important factor in attracting users to use this platform. In the other words, if people are unable to trust that the equipment and information will be reasonably safe against damage, abuse and the other security threats, this lack of trust leads to a reduction in the use of IoT-based applications. Recently, Tewari and Gupta (J Supercomput 1–18, 2016) have proposed an ultralightweight RFID authentication protocol to provide desired security for objects in IoT. In this paper, we consider the security of the proposed protocol and present a passive secret disclosure attack against it. The success probability of the attack is ‘1’ while the complexity of the attack is only eavesdropping one session of the protocol. The presented attack has negligible complexity. We verify the correctness of the presented attack by simulation.

Keywords

RFID Secret disclosure Authentication Internet of Things 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions to improve the content and presentation of this paper. This work was supported by Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University under contract number 27770.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmadian Z, Salmasizadeh M, Aref MR (2013) Desynchronization attack on RAPP ultralightweight authentication protocol. Inf Process Lett 113(7):205–209MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmadian Z, Salmasizadeh M, Aref MR (2013) Recursive linear and differential cryptanalysis of ultralightweight authentication protocols. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 8(7):1140–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    An R, Feng H, Liu Q, Li L (2017) Three elliptic curve cryptography-based RFID authentication protocols for Internet of Things. Springer, Berlin, pp 857–878Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Avoine G, Carpent X (2012) Yet another ultralightweight authentication protocol that is broken. In: Workshop on s Security—RFIDSec’12, NijmegenGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Avoine G, Carpent X, Martin B (2012) Privacy-friendly synchronized ultralightweight authentication protocols in the storm. J Netw Comput Appl 35(2):826–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bagheri N, Safkhani M (2017) Attack on Tewari and Gupta protocol code repository. https://github.com/nbagheri/Attack-on-Tewari-and-Gupta-protocol
  7. 7.
    Bagheri N, Safkhani M, Peris-Lopez P, Tapiador JE (2014) Weaknesses in a new ultralightweight RFID authentication protocol with permutation—RAPP. Secur Commun Netw 7(6):945–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chien H-Y (2007) Sasi: a new ultralightweight RFID authentication protocol providing strong authentication and strong integrity. IEEE Trans Dependable Secur Comput 4(4):337–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daemen J, Rijmen V (2002) The design of Rijndael: AES—the advanced encryption standard. Information Security and Cryptography. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D’Arco P, Santis AD (2008) Weaknesses in a recent ultra-lightweight RFID authentication protocol. In: Vaudenay S (ed) AFRICACRYPT Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5023. Springer, Berlin, pp 27–39Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D’Arco P, Santis AD (2011) On ultralightweight RFID authentication protocols. IEEE Trans Dependable Secur Comput 8(4):548–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guo P, Wang J, Geng XH, Kim CS, Kim J-U (2014) A variable threshold-value authentication architecture for wireless mesh networks. J Internet Technol 15(6):929–935Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gupta B, Agrawal DP, Yamaguchi S (eds) (2016) Handbook of research on modern cryptographic solutions for computer and cyber security. IGI Global, HersheyGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peris-Lopez P, Castro JCH, Estévez-Tapiador JM, Ribagorda A (2008) Advances in ultralightweight cryptography for low-cost RFID tags: Gossamer protocol. In: WISA, pp 56–68Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Phan RC-W (2009) Cryptanalysis of a new ultralightweight RFID authentication protocol—SASI. IEEE Trans Dependable Secur Comput 6(4):316–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Quan Q, Jia Y-L, Zhang R (2016) A lightweight RFID security protocol based on elliptic curve cryptography. Int J Netw Secur 18(2):354–361Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rivest RL, Shamir A, Adleman LM (1978) A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems. Commun ACM 21(2):120–126MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ronen E, O’Flynn C, Shamir A, Weingarten A (2016) IoT goes nuclear: creating a zigbee chain reaction. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2016:1047Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ronen E, Shamir A (2016) Extended functionality attacks on IoT devices: the case of smart lights. In: IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy, EuroS&P 2016, Saarbrücken, Germany, 21–24 March 2016, pp 3–12Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tewari A, Gupta BB (2016) Cryptanalysis of a novel ultra-lightweight mutual authentication protocol for IoT devices using RFID tags. J Supercomput 1–18. doi:10.1007/s11227-016-1849-x
  21. 21.
    Tian Y, Chen G, Li J (2012) A new ultralightweight RFID authentication protocol with permutation. IEEE Commun Lett 16(5):702–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Engineering DepartmentShahid Rajaee Teacher Training UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Electrical Engineering DepartmentShahid Rajaee Teacher Training UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations