The Journal of Supercomputing

, Volume 69, Issue 3, pp 1054–1067 | Cite as

Cloud computing-based jam management for a manufacturing system in a Green IT environment

Article

Abstract

A manufacturing system is composed of and operated by many components; motors, cylinders, and sensors. Its purpose is to increase operational performance without system error or jam. And, recently, the Green IT/S (information technologies and systems) refer to processes that directly or indirectly address environmental sustainability in organizations. Green IT addresses energy consumption, reduces the bad productivity, and increases system operational efficiency using the computer. However, when the system experiences some problem or operational error, users (system operators or managers) often find it difficult to locate the jam position immediately and precisely. It is also difficult to know the cause of the jam and to manage jam information even after they read and find relevant error text in a repair manual for the system. This research proposes a method to efficiently manage jam status for manufacturing systems. For this purpose, a topic map was used. The topic model has topic types, associations, and occurrences, which relate to operational jam, system jam, and system components. All jam status information to support users is managed by XML specification, distinctly and efficiently.

Keywords

Manufacturing system System jam management Jam management Topic map IC test handler 

References

  1. 1.
    Andreas CP, John HLV, Alexander HS (1998) Heat-transfer enhancing features for handler tray-type device carriers. IEEE Trans Compon Packaging Manuf Technol, Part C 21(4):302–310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ari I, Muhtaroglu N (2013) Design and implementation of a cloud computing service for finite element analysis. Adv Eng Softw 60–61:122–135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beier JR, Tesche T (2001) Navigation and interaction in medical knowledge spaces using topic maps. Int Congr Ser 1230:384–388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bi ZM, Wang L (2010) Advances in 3D data acquisition and processing for industrial applications. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 26(5):403–413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bose R, Luo X (2011) Integrative framework for assessing firms’ potential to undertake Green IT initiatives via virtualization—a theoretical perspective. J Strateg Inf Syst 20:38–54 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Butler T (2011) Compliance with institutional imperatives on environmental sustainability: building theory on the role of Green IS. J Strateg Inf Syst 20:6–26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cai S et al (2013) Exploring the role of IT for environmental sustain ability in China: an empirical analysis. Int J Prod Econ. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.01.030 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chou DC, Chou AY (2012) Awareness of Green IT and its value model. Comput Stand Interfaces 34:447–451 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cochran DS, Arinez JF, Duda JW, Linck J (2001/2002) A decomposition approach for manufacturing system design. J Manuf Syst 20(6):371–389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Gonzalo M, Nicholas GO (2005) An approach using Petri Nets and improved heuristic search for manufacturing system scheduling. J Manuf Syst 24(2):79–92 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hasse N, Andersson PH (2010) Simulation of service-oriented and distributed manufacturing systems. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 26:622–628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hunter SL (2001/2002) Ergonomic evaluation of manufacturing system designs. J Manuf Syst 20(6):429–444 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ISO/IEC 13250 (2002) Topic maps, information technology document description and processing languages Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jenkin TA, Webster J, McShane L (2011) An agenda for ‘Green’ information technology and systems research. Inf Organ 21:17–40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jeong HY (2006) The component based factory automation control in the Internet environment. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4270. Springer, Berlin Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karabeg D, Guescini R, Nordeng TW (2005) Flexible and exploratory learning by polyscopic topic maps. In: Proceedings of the fifth IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim Y, Chang H (2012) IT convergence index and measurement design in the manufacturing industry. J Converg 3(3):47–50 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim B, Youn C-H, Park Y-S, Lee Y, Choi W (2012) An adaptive workflow scheduling scheme based on an estimated data processing rate for next generation sequencing in cloud computing. J Inf Process Syst. doi:10.3745/JIPS.2012.8.4.555 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kusunoki K, Imai I, Negi T, Matsuda N, Ushijima K (2002) A proposal and evaluation of a method of remote access to FA controllers via the Internet. Electron Commun Jpn 82(6):23–32 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu DR, Ke CK, Lee JY, Lee CF (2008) Knowledge maps for composite e-services: a mining-based system platform coupling with recommendations. Expert Syst Appl 34:700–716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Murugesan S (2008) Harnessing Green IT: principles and practices. IT Professional 10(1):24–33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Newman D, Baldwin T, Cavedon L, Huang E, Karimi S, Martinez D, Scholer F, Zobel J (2010) Visualizing search results and document collections using topic maps. J Web Semant 8:169–175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pan Y, Zhang J (2012) Parallel programming on cloud computing platforms—challenges and solutions. J Converg 3(4):23–28 MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pearn WL, Chung SH, Chena AY, Yang MH (2004) A case study on the multistage IC final testing scheduling problem with reentry. Int J Prod Econ 88:257–267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Semiconductor Test Equipment on http://www.siliconfareast.com/testeqpt.htm
  27. 27.
    Silas S, Ezra K, Blessing Rajsingh E (2012) A novel fault tolerant service selection framework for pervasive computing. Hum-Cent Comput Inf Sci. doi:10.1186/2192-1962-2-5 MATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vrabič R, Butala P (2011) Computational mechanics approach to managing complexity in manufacturing systems. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60:503–506 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Williams RA, Benhabib B, Smith KC (1996) A DES-theory-based hybrid supervisory control system for manufacturing systems. J Manuf Syst 15(2):71–83 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Xu X (2012) From cloud computing to cloud manufacturing. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 28(1):75–86 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringSeoul National University of Science and TechnologySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Humanitas CollegeKyung Hee UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations