The Journal of Supercomputing

, Volume 65, Issue 3, pp 1179–1191 | Cite as

How mobile phones perform in collaborative augmented reality (CAR) applications

  • Víctor Fernández
  • Juan M. OrduñaEmail author
  • Pedro Morillo


This paper presents the experimental analysis of mobile phones for Augmented Reality marker tracking, a core task that any CAR application must include. The results show that the most time consuming stage is the marker detection stage, followed by the image acquisition stage. Moreover, the rendering stage is decoupled on some devices, depending on the operative system used. This decoupling process allows avoiding low refresh rates, facilitating the collaborative work. However, the use of multicore devices does not significantly improve the performance provided by CAR applications. Finally, the results show that unless a poor network bandwidth makes the network to become the system bottleneck, the performance of CAR applications based on mobile phones will be limited by the detection stage. These results can be used as the basis for an efficient design of CAR systems and applications based on mobile phones.


Collaborative augmented reality Marker tracking Mobile phones 



This work has been jointly supported by the Spanish MICINN and the European Commission FEDER funds, under grants TIN2009-14475-C04-04, and TIN2010-12011-E.


  1. 1.
    Ahonen T (2010) TomiAhonen phone book 2010. TomiAhonen Consulting Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Apple: iOS 4 (2011). Available at
  3. 3.
    Bauset VF, Orduña JM, Morillo P (2011) Performance characterization on mobile phones for collaborative augmented reality (car) applications. In: Proc of IEEE/ACM 15th international symposium on distributed simulation and real time applications (DS-RT ’11), pp 52–53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Billinghurst M, Kato H (1999) Real world teleconferencing. In: Proc of the conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI 99) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Billinghurst M, Poupyrev I, Kato H, May R (2000) Mixing realities in shared space: an augmented reality interface for collaborative computing. In: IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo (ICME 2000), vol 3, pp 1641–1644. doi: 10.1109/ICME.2000.871085 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fiala M (2005) Artag: a fiducial marker system using digital techniques. In: Proc of IEEE conf on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), vol 2, pp 590–596 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Google: Android (2011). Available at
  8. 8.
    Hall S, Anderson E (2009) Operating systems for mobile computing. J Comput Small Coll 25:64–71 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hallerer T, Feiner S, Terauchi T, Rashid G (1999) Exploring mars: developing indoor and outdoor user interfaces to a mobile augmented reality system. Comput Graph 23:779–785 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Henrysson A, Billinghurst M, Ollila M (2005) Face to face collaborative ar on mobile phones. In: Proc of 4th international symposium on mixed and augmented reality, pp 80–89 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henrysson A, Ollila M (2004) Umar: ubiquitous mobile augmented reality. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on mobile and ubiquitous multimedia (MUM ’04), pp 41–45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee SE, Zhang Y, Fang Z, Srinivasan S, Iyer R, Newell D (2009) Accelerating mobile augmented reality on a handheld platform. In: IEEE international conference on computer design (ICCD 2009), pp 419–426. doi: 10.1109/ICCD.2009.5413123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Loulier B (2011) Augmented reality on iphone using artoolkitplus. Available at
  14. 14.
    Loulier B (2011) Virtual reality on iphone. Available at
  15. 15.
    Mahring M, Lessig C, Bimber O (2004) Video see-through ar on consumer cell-phones. In: ISMAR ’04, pp 252–253 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nyartoolkit: Nyartoolkit code (2011). Available at
  17. 17.
    Nyatla: Nyartoolkit: artoolkit class library for java/c#/android (2011). Available at
  18. 18.
    Piekarski W, Thomas BH (2002) Tinmith-hand: unified user interface technology for mobile outdoor augmented reality and indoor virtual reality Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schmalstieg D, Wagner D (2007) Experiences with handheld augmented reality. In: 6th IEEE and ACM international symposium on mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR 2007), pp 3–18. doi: 10.1109/ISMAR.2007.4538819 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schmeil A, Broll W (2007) An anthropomorphic AR-based personal information manager and guide. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on universal access in human–computer interaction: ambient interaction (UAHCI ’07). Springer, Berlin, pp 699–708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thomas MHMBB (2007) Emerging technologies of augmented reality: interfaces and design. IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-59904-066-0
  22. 22.
    Wagner D, Reitmayr G, Mulloni A, Drummond T, Schmalstieg D (2008) Pose tracking from natural features on mobile phones. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACM international symposium on mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR ’08). IEEE Comput Soc, Los Alamitos, pp 125–134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Víctor Fernández
    • 1
  • Juan M. Orduña
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pedro Morillo
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de InformáticaUniversidad de ValenciaBurjassotSpain

Personalised recommendations