Advertisement

The Journal of Supercomputing

, Volume 58, Issue 3, pp 302–313 | Cite as

Accelerating network applications by distributed interfaces on heterogeneous multiprocessor architectures

  • Pablo Cascón
  • Andrés Ortiz
  • Julio Ortega
  • Antonio F. Díaz
  • Ignacio Rojas
Article

Abstract

Hosts with several, possibly heterogeneous and/or multicore, processors provide new challenges and opportunities to accelerate applications with high communications bandwidth requirements. Many opportunities to scale these network applications with the increase in the link bandwidths are related to the exploitation of the available parallelism provided by the presence of several processing cores in the servers, not only for computing the workload of the user application but also for decreasing the overhead associated to the network interface and the system software.

This paper analyses some alternatives to distribute the network interface among the different cores available in the host. These alternatives include the use of heterogeneous multicore processors, such as network processors, and the exploitation of the affinity between the network interface and the location (proximity to the memories where the different data structures are stored) and characteristics of the processing architecture. The proposed distributed network interfaces provide improvements in throughput and latency that have been experimentally evaluated by using an intrusion prevention system, which constitutes a useful network function.

Keywords

Interrupt affinity Intrusion prevention systems Network interface Network processor Processor affinity Simics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Catanzaro B et al. (2010) Ubiquitous parallel computing from Berkeley, Illinois, and Stanford. IEEE Micro 41–55 (March/April) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar R et al (2005) Heterogeneous chip multiprocessors. IEEE Comput 38(11):32–38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hill M, Marty M (2008) Amdahl’s law in the multicore era. IEEE Comput 41(6):33–38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Willmann P, Shafer J, Carr D, Menon A, Rixner S, Cox AL, Zwaenepoel W (2007) Concurrent direct network access for virtual machine monitors. In: Proc intl symposium on high-performance computer architecture, February, 2007 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rixner S (2008) Network virtualization: breaking the performance barrier. ACM Queue (January/February): 36–52 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balaji P, Feng W, Panda DK (2006) Bridging the Ethernet-Ethernot performance gap. IEEE Micro (May–June): 24–40 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shivam P, Chase, JS (2003) On the elusive benefits of protocol offload. In: SIGCOMM’03 workshop on network-I/O convergence: experience, lessons, implications (NICELI), August, 2003 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Regnier G et al (2004) TCP onloading for data center servers. IEEE Comput 37(11):48–58 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wun B, Crowley P (2006) Network I/O acceleration in heterogeneous multicore processors. In: Proceedings of the 14th annual symposium on high performance interconnects (hot interconnects), August, 2006 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ortiz A, Ortega J, Díaz AF, Prieto A (2009) A new offloaded/onloaded network interface for high performance communication. In: 17th euromicro international conference on parallel, distributed and network-based processing. PDP 2009, February, 2008 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shalev L, Marhervaks V, Machulsky Z, Biran G, Satran J, Ben-Yehuda M, Shimony I (2006) Loosely coupled TCP acceleration architecture. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE symposium on high-performance interconnects (HOTI) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nahum EM, Yates DJ, Kurose JF, Towsley D (1994) Performance issues in parallelized network protocols. In: Proc of the operating systems design and implementation, pp 125–137 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim H, Pai VS, Rixner S (2003) Exploiting task-level concurrency in a programmable network interface. In: Proc of the ACM PPoPP’03 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shivam P, Wyckoff P, Panda D (2002) Can user-level protocols take advantage of multi-CPU NICs? In: Proc intl parallel and distributed processing symp (IPDPS’02), April, 2002, pp 64–69 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Narayanaswamy G, Balaji P, Feng W (2007) An analysis of 10-gigabit Ethernet protocol staks in multicore environments. In: 15th IEEE symp on high-performance interconects (HOTI’07), pp 109–116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Foong A, Fung J, Newell D (2004) An in-depth analysis of the impact of processor affinity on network performance. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE international conference on networks Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Salehi J, Kurose J, Towsley D (1996) The effectiveness of affinity-based scheduling in multiprocessor network protocol processing. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 4(4):516–530 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jan H, Jin H-W (2009) MiAMI: multi-core aware processor affinity for TCP/IP over multiple network interfaces. In: 17th IEEE symposium on high performance interconnects. HOTI Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    de Bruijn W, Bos H (2008) Model-T: Rethinking the OS for terabits speeds. In: Workshop on high-speed networks (HSN2008), INFOCOM’2008 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mudigonda J, Vin HM, Yavatkar R (2005) Overcoming the memory wall in packet processing: hammers or ladders. In: Proc of the ACM ANCS’05. Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Irqbalance daemon (2011) GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2. http://irqbalance.org/
  22. 22.
    Johnson EJ, Kunze AR (2003) IXP2400/2800 programming. The complete microengine coding guide. Intel Press, Santa Clara Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Netronome: NFE-i800 Network Acceleration Card (2006) www.netronome.com/pages/acceleration-cards
  24. 24.
    Love R (2005) Linux kernel development, 2nd edn. Novell Press, Atlanta Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Netfilter framework (2011) www.netfilter.org
  26. 26.
    Benvenuti C (2006) Understanding Linux network internals, 1st edn. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Binkert N et al (2006) Integrated network interfaces for high-bandwidth TCP/IP. In: Proc of the ASPLOS conference, December, 2006 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pablo Cascón
    • 1
  • Andrés Ortiz
    • 2
  • Julio Ortega
    • 1
  • Antonio F. Díaz
    • 1
  • Ignacio Rojas
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Arquitectura y Tecnología de ComputadoresUniversidad de GranadaGranadaSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Ingeniería de ComunicacionesUniversidad de MálagaMálagaSpain

Personalised recommendations