The Journal of Supercomputing

, Volume 62, Issue 2, pp 681–688

Zero-energy optical logic: can it be practical?

Article
  • 92 Downloads

Abstract

The thermodynamic “permission” to build a device that can evaluate a sequence of logic operations that operate at zero energy has existed and has been unsolved for about 40 years. Over the last four years, we have explored the possibility of a constructive proof. And we finally have found successfully such a proof and found that lossless logic systems could actually be built. It can only be implemented by optics. In this paper, the problems addressed are speed, size, and error rate. The speed problem simply vanishes, as it was an inference from the implicit assumption that the logic would be electronic. But the other two problems are real and must be addressed if energy-free logic is to have any significant applications. Initial steps in solving the size and error rate are addressed in more detail.

Keywords

Zero-energy logic Conservative logic 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Landauer R (1961) Irreversibility and Heat Generation in the Computing Process. IBM J Res Dev 5:183 MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bennett CH, Landauer R (1985) The fundamental physical limits of computation. Sci Am 253:48–56 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Keyes RW (2001) Fundamental limits of silicon technology. Proc IEEE 89:227–239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caulfield HJ, Soref RA, Qian L, Zavalin A, Hardy J (2007) Generalized optical logic elements—GOLEs. Opt Commun 271:365–376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Qian L, Caulfield HJ (2006) What can we do with a linear optical logic gate? Inf Sci 176:3370–3392 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caulfield HJ, Vikram CS, Zavalin A (2006) Optical logic redux. Optik 117:199–209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hardy J, Shamir J (2007) Optics inspired logic architecture. Opt Express 15:150–165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shamir J, Caulfield HJ, Miceli W, Seymour RJ (1986) Optical computing and the Fredkin gates. Appl Opt 25:1604–1607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feynman RP (1985) Quantum mechanical computers. Opt News 11:11–20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zavalin AI, Caulfield HJ, Vikram CS (2010) Implementing minimal clock skew directed logic. Optik 121:1300–1308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zeng S, Zhang Y, Li B, Pun EY-B (2010) Ultrasmall optical logic gates based on silicon periodic dielectric waveguides. Photonics Nanostruct Fundam Appl 8:32–37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kulcke W, Kosanke K, Max E, Habegger MA, Harris TJ, Fleisher H (1966) Digital light deflectors. Proc IEEE 54:1419–1429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soref RA, McMahon DH (1966) Optical design of Wollaston-prism digital light deflectors. Appl Opt 5:425–434 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fisk UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations