The Journal of Supercomputing

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 15–28 | Cite as

Dynamic and context-aware streaming adaptation to smooth quality degradation due to IEEE 802.11 performance anomaly

Article

Abstract

The need for application-level context visibility to properly perform streaming service management in wired-wireless integrated networks is widely recognized. In particular, the paper claims the need for full application-level awareness of context data about the IEEE 802.11 performance anomaly, i.e., when even a single node located at the borders of the coverage area of a Wi-Fi access point produces a relevant degradation in the connectivity quality of all other nodes in the area. We propose a middleware that on the one hand portably predicts and detects anomaly situations via decentralized and lightweight client-side mechanisms and, on the other hand, exploits anomaly awareness to promptly react with application-level management operations (streaming quality downscaling and traffic shaping). In particular, the paper focuses on how our middleware performs anomaly-driven quality downscaling both to preserve the goodput at nodes in well-covered areas and to minimize quality degradations at the clients generating the anomaly. The reported experimental results point out how anomaly prediction/detection can relevantly improve the effectiveness of streaming downscaling, thus allowing to maintain acceptable service quality notwithstanding Wi-Fi anomaly occurrences.

Keywords

Service management Wireless networks Streaming adaptation IEEE 802.11 anomaly Middleware 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Corson MS, Macker JP, Park VD (2001) Mobile and wireless Internet services: putting the pieces together. IEEE Commun 39(6):148–155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banerjee N, Wei W, Das SK (2003) Mobility support in wireless Internet. IEEE Wireless Commun 10(5):54–61 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kounavis ME, Campbell AT (2005) Seamless connectivity in infrastructure-based networks. In: Bellavista P, Corradi A (eds) The handbook of mobile middleware, 1st edn. Chapman and Hall, CRC, New York Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bellavista P et al. (2005) Application-level middleware to proactively manage handoff in wireless Internet multimedia. In: Proc. of IEEE/IFIP int. conf. on management of multimedia networks and services (MMNS). Springer, New York Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang DY et al. (2006) Performance enhancements of multirate IEEE 802.11 WLANs with geographically scattered stations. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 5(7):906–919 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heusse M et al (2003) Performance anomaly of 802.11b. In: Proc of IEEE annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies (INFOCOM) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) (1999) IEEE Standard 802.11 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garroppo RG et al (2005) The wireless hierarchical token bucket: a channel aware scheduler for 802.11 networks. In: Proc of the IEEE int sym on a world of wireless mobile and multimedia networks (WoWMoM) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garroppo RG et al. (2005) TWHTB: a transmission time based channel-aware scheduler for 802.11 systems. In: Proc of the EURASIP workshop on resource allocation in wireless networks (RAWNET). IEEE Computer Society Press, New York Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garcia-Macias JA et al. (2003) Quality of service and mobility for the wireless Internet. Wirel Netw J 9(4):34–42 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li Q, van der Schaar M (2004) Providing adaptive QoS to layered video over wireless local area networks through real-time retry limit adaptation. IEEE Trans Multimed 6(2):278–290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bellavista P et al. (2007) Context-aware multimedia middleware solutions for counteracting IEEE 802.11 performance anomaly. In: Proc of int conf on multimedia and ubiquitous engineering (MUE). IEEE Computer Society Press, New York Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seeling P et al. (2004) Network performance evaluation using frame size and quality traces of single-layer and two-layer video: a tutorial. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 6(2):58–78 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klaue J et al (2003). EvalVid—a framework for video transmission and quality evaluation. In: Proc of the int conf on modelling techniques and tools for computer performance evaluation (TOOLS) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Bellavista
    • 1
  • Antonio Corradi
    • 1
  • Luca Foschini
    • 1
  1. 1.DEISUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations