Advertisement

The Journal of Supercomputing

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 143–154 | Cite as

Creative destruction of computing systems: analysis and modeling

  • Natali HritonenkoEmail author
  • Yuri Yatsenko
Article

Abstract

The paper analyzes the problem of rational replacement of computing systems. Such systems, especially high-performance computers, are expensive, but quickly become obsolete. A system analysis of the replacement problem is provided and the relevant modeling problems are identified and studied. The obtained results give certain rules for calculating the optimal lifetime of computing systems, which are based on the given rates of technological change in the related computer industry. Two simulation examples estimate the optimal lifetime of PCs and high-performance computers in the current US economy. The results are in good agreement with other recommendations and existing business practice.

Keywords

Computing systems High-performance computers Technological change Economics of networks Vintage capital models Equipment lifetime Optimization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Akl SG (2004) Superlinear performance in real-time parallel computation. Journal of Supercomputing 29:89–111zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boucekkine R, de la Croix D (2003) Information technologies, embodiment and growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 87:2007–2034MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Business Tune-up: When is it time to replace existing hardware?. IBM e-Newsletter, 30 March 2004, http://www-1.ibm.com/businesscenter/smb/usen/contenttemplate/gcl_xmlid/16904
  4. 4.
    Bylka S, Sethi SP, Sorger G (1992) Minimal forecast horizons in equipment replacement models with multiple technologies and general switching costs. Naval Research Logistics 39:487–507zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chand S, McClurg T, Ward J (2000) A model for parallel machine replacement with capacity expansion. European Journal of Operations Research 121:519–531zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheevaprawatdomrong T, Smith RL (2003) A paradox in equipment replacement under technological improvement. Operations Research Letters 31:77–82zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cooley T, Greenwood J, Yorukoglu M (1997) The replacement problem. Journal of Monetary Economics 40:457–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Economides N (2000) Real options and the costs of the local telecommunications network. In J. Alleman and E. Noam (Eds.), The New Investment Theory of Real Options and its Implications for Cost Models in Telecommunications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 13–38.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Economides N, Skrzypacz A (2003) Standards Coalitions Formation and Market Structure in Network Industries, Working Paper no. EC-03–08, Stern School of Business, N.Y.U.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Graham S, Snir M (2005) The NRC report on the future of supercomputing. CTWatch Quarterly, Volume 1, Number 2, http://www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/articles/2005/02/nrc-report/.
  11. 11.
    Greenwood J, Herkowitz Z, Krusell P (1997) Long-run implications of investment-specific technological change. American Economic Review 87:342–362Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Horan K (2004) Where are the jobs? BusinessWeek, March 22, pp. 36–37Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hritonenko N (2004) Optimization analysis of a nonlinear integral model with applications to economics. Nonlinear Studies 11:59–70Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hritonenko N, Yatsenko Yu (2003) Applied Mathematical Modeling Of Engineering Problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hritonenko N, Yatsenko Yu (1996) Integral-functional equations for optimal renovation problems. Optimization 36:249–261zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hritonenko N, Yatsenko Yu (1999) Mathematical Modeling in Economics, Ecology and the Environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hritonenko N, Yatsenko Yu (1996) Modeling and Optimization of the Lifetime of Technologies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hritonenko N, Yatsenko Yu (2004) Structure of optimal trajectories in a nonlinear dynamic model with endogenous delay. Journal of Applied Mathematics 5:433–445zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Love CE, Guo R (1996) Utilizing Weibull failure rates in repair limit analysis for equipment replacement/preventive maintenance decisions. Journal of Operations Research Society 47:1366–1376zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McClurg T, Chand S (2002) A parallel machine replacement model. Naval Research Logistics 49:275–287zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nasiri R, Moeini A, Abdollahzadeh A (2004) A new approach toward procurement of software models via distributed business models. Journal of Supercomputing 29:287–302zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oliner S, Sichel D (2002) Information technology and productivity: Where are we now and where are we going?. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review 3:15–44Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oliner S, Sichel D (2000) The resurgence of growth in the late 1990s: Is information technology the story? Journal of Economic Perspectives 14:3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sethi SP, Chand S (1979) Planning horizon procedures in machine replacement models. Management Sciences 25:140–151zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    State Administrative & Accounting Manual (1999) Office of Financial Management, State of Washington, Seattle WAGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Strohmaier E, Dongarra J, Meuer H, Simon H (2005) Recent trends in the marketplace of high performance computing. CTWatch Quarterly, Volume 1, Number 2, http://www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/articles/2005/02/recent-trends/.
  27. 27.
    van Hilten O (1991) The optimal lifetime of capital equipment. Journal of Economic Theory 55:449–454zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yatsenko Yu, Hritonenko N (2005) Optimization of the lifetime of capital equipment using integral models. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization 1:415–432zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wu J.-J., Yeh S.-H., Liu P (2004) Efficient multiple multicast on heterogeneous network of workstations. Journal of Supercomputing 29:59–88zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhu M, Cai W, Lee B.-S (2005) A hybrid analysis of an optimization approach for cluster applications. Journal of Supercomputing 32:191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsPrairie View A & M UniversityPrairie ViewUSA
  2. 2.College of Business and EconomicsHouston Baptist UniversityHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations