Studia Logica

, Volume 103, Issue 1, pp 227–231 | Cite as

Book Review: Neil Tennant, Changes of Mind: An Essay on Rational Belief Revision

Article
First Online:
  • 106 Downloads
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angluin D. (1980) Inductive inference of formal languages from positive data. Information and Control 45(2): 117–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baltag, A., N. Gierasimczuk, and S. Smets (2011). Belief revision as a truthtracking process. In K. Apt (ed.), TARK’11: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, Groningen, The Netherlands, July 12-14, 2011 ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 187–190.Google Scholar
  3. Gierasimczuk, N. (2010). Knowing One’s Limits. Logical Analysis of Inductive Inference. PhD thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  4. Gierasimczuk, N., D. de Jongh, and V. F. Hendricks (2014). Logic and learning. In A. Baltag, and S. Smets (eds.), Johan van Benthem on Logical and Informational Dynamics. Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Gierasimczuk, N., and D. de Jongh (2013). On the complexity of conclusive update. The Computer Journal 56(3):365–377.Google Scholar
  6. Hansson S. O. (1991) Belief contraction without recovery. Studia Logica 50: 251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Isaac, A., J. Szymanik, and R. Verbrugge (2014). Logic and complexity in cognitive science. In A. Baltag, and S. Smets (eds.), Johan van Benthem on Logical and Informational Dynamics. Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Kelly, K. T. (1998). The learning power of belief revision. In TARK’98: Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, San Francisco, CA, USA. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., pp. 111–124.Google Scholar
  9. Martin, E., and D. Osherson (1998). Elements of Scientific Inquiry. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Tennant N. (1987) Natural deduction and sequent calculus for Intuitionistic Relevant Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 52: 665–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tennant N. (1994) Changing the theory of theory change: Towards a computational approach. British Journal for Philosophy of Science 45(3): 865–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tennant N. (1997) Changing the theory of theory change: Reply to my critics. British Journal for Philosophy of Science 48: 569–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tennant N. (2006) A degeneracy theorem for the full AGM-theory of theoryrevision. Journal of Symbolic Logic 71(2): 661–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tennant, N. (2012). Changes of Mind. An Essay on Rational Belief Revision. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Logic, Language and ComputationUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations