Are There Enough Injective Sets?
- 149 Downloads
The axiom of choice ensures precisely that, in ZFC, every set is projective: that is, a projective object in the category of sets. In constructive ZF (CZF) the existence of enough projective sets has been discussed as an additional axiom taken from the interpretation of CZF in Martin-Löf’s intuitionistic type theory. On the other hand, every non-empty set is injective in classical ZF, which argument fails to work in CZF. The aim of this paper is to shed some light on the problem whether there are (enough) injective sets in CZF. We show that no two element set is injective unless the law of excluded middle is admitted for negated formulas, and that the axiom of power set is required for proving that “there are strongly enough injective sets”. The latter notion is abstracted from the singleton embedding into the power set, which ensures enough injectives both in every topos and in IZF. We further show that it is consistent with CZF to assume that the only injective sets are the singletons. In particular, assuming the consistency of CZF one cannot prove in CZF that there are enough injective sets. As a complement we revisit the duality between injective and projective sets from the point of view of intuitionistic type theory.
KeywordsInjective object Constructive set theory Axiom of powerset Intuitionistic type theory Axiom of choice
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Aczel, P., and M. Rathjen, Notes on Constructive Set Theory, Draft available at the address: http://www.mittag-leffler.se/preprints/meta/AczelMon_Sep_24_09_16_56.rdf.htm.
- 10.Friedman H.: Set-theoretic foundations for constructive analysis. Annals of Mathematics 19, 868–870 (1977)Google Scholar
- 11.MacLane S.: Homology. Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg (1975)Google Scholar
- 13.Martin–Löf, P., Intuitionistic Type Theory. Notes by G. Sambin of a series of lectures given in Padua, June 1980. Bibliopolis, Napoli. Studies Proof Theory 1, 1984.Google Scholar
- 14.Martin-Löf, P., 100 years of Zermelo’s axiom of choice: what was the problem with it?, in S. Lindström, E. Palmgren, K. Segerberg, and V. Stoltenberg-Hansen (eds.), Logicism, Intuitionism, and Formalism—What Has Become of Them? Springer, Dordrecht. Synthese Library 341:209–219, 2009.Google Scholar
- 16.Mines R., Ruitenburg W., Richman F.: A Course in Constructive Algebra. Springer, New York (1987)Google Scholar