Studia Logica

, Volume 94, Issue 3, pp 355–380 | Cite as

Carnap’s Theory of Descriptions and its Problems

Article

Abstract

Carnap’s theory of descriptions was restricted in two ways. First, the descriptive conditions had to be non-modal. Second, only primitive predicates or the identity predicate could be used to predicate something of the descriptum. The motivating reasons for these two restrictions that can be found in the literature will be critically discussed. Both restrictions can be relaxed, but Carnap’s theory can still be blamed for not dealing adequately with improper descriptions.

Keywords

Carnap Føllesdal Quine Martí Kremer Modal Logic Individual concept Identity Descriptions Uniqueness Collapse Slingshot Self-predication 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boolos George S., Burgess John P., Jeffrey Richard C.: Computability and Logic, fourth edn. Cambridge University Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carnap Rudolf: ‘Modalities and quantification’. Journal of Symbolic Logic 11(2), 33–64 (1946)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carnap Rudolf: Meaning and Necessity. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1956)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carnap, Rudolf, The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, vol.XI of The Library of Living Philosophers, chap. My Conceptions of the Logic of Modalities, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, 1963, pp. 889–900.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Føllesdal Dagfinn: ‘Quine on modality’. Synthese 19(1-2), 147–157 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Føllesdal, Dagfinn, Referential Opacity and Modal Logic, Routledge, 2004. Originally published as: Referential Opacity and Modal logic. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1966.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hughes G., Cresswell M.: A New Introduction to Modal Logic. Routledge, London (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heylen Jan: ‘Carnapian modal and epistemic arithmetic’. In: Carrara, Massimiliano, Morato, Vittorio (eds) Language, Knowledge, and Metaphysics. Proceedings of the First SIFA Graduate Conference, pp. 97–121. College Publications, London (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heylen Jan: ‘Descriptions and unknowability’. Analysis 70(10), 50–52 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horsten Leon: ‘Canonical naming systems’. Minds and Machines 15(2), 229–257 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Horsten Leon: ‘An argument concerning the unknowable’. Analysis 69(2), 240–242 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kremer Michael: ‘Marti on descriptions in Carnap’s s2’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 26(6), 629–634 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kripke, Saul A., ‘Individual concepts: Their logic, philosophy and some of their uses’, in Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophy Association, vol. 66, 1992, pp. 70–73.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martí Genoveva: ‘Do modal distinctions collapse in Carnap’s system?’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 23(6), 575–593 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martí Genoveva: ‘Rethinking Quine’s argument on the collapse of modal distinctions’. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38(2), 276–294 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parsons Terence: ‘Essentialism and quantified modal logic’. The Philosophical Review 78(1), 35–52 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Quine, Willard Van Orman, Word and Object, M.I.T. Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Quine, Willard Van Orman, The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, chap. Three Grades of Modal Involvement, Random House, New York, 1966, pp. 156–174.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schurz, Gerhard, ‘Carnap’s modal logic’, in W. Stelzner, and M. St¨ockler, (eds.), Zwischen traditioneller und moderner Logik. Nichtklassische Ansätze, Mentis Verlag, 2001, pp. 365–380.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Taylor B.: Modes of Occurrence. Verbs, Adverbs, and Events.. Blackwell, Oxford (1985)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Philosophy, K.U.LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations