Studia Logica

, Volume 94, Issue 1, pp 139–145 | Cite as

Book Reviews

  • David Ripley


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Anderson Alan Ross, Belnap Nuel D.: Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity vol. 1. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (1975)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beall J.C.: ‘Transparent disquotationalism’. In: Beall, J.C., Armour-Garb, B. (eds) Deflationism and Paradox, Oxford, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beall J.C.: Spandrels of Truth. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beall J.C., Brady Ross T., Hazen A.P.: Graham Priest, and Greg Restall, ‘Relevant restricted quantification’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35(6), 587–598 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brady Ross: Universal Logic. CSLI Publications, Stanford, California (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mares Edwin D.: Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Interpretation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maudlin Tim: Truth and Paradox. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Priest Graham: In Contradiction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Restall, Greg, ‘Information flow and relevant logics’, in J. Seligman, and D. Westerståhl, (eds.), Logic, Language, and Computation: the 1994 Moraga Proceedings, CSLI Publications, Stanford, California, 1995, pp. 463–477.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Routley, Richard, Robert K. Meyer, Val Plumwood, and Ross T. Brady, Relevant Logics and their Rivals 1, Ridgeview, Atascadero, California, 1982.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Welch Philip: ‘Ultimate truth vis-à-vis stable truth’. Review of Symbolic Logic 1(1), 126–142 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Jean-Nicod (CNRS), DEC-ENSParisFrance

Personalised recommendations