Kinetics of the hydrogen abstraction alkane + O2 → alkyl + HO2 reaction class: an application of the reaction class transition state theory
- 24 Downloads
In this work, the kinetics of reaction class of hydrogen abstraction from saturated hydrocarbons by O2 molecules has been studied. The high-pressure reaction rate constants were determined using reaction class transition state theory/structure-activity relationship (RC-TST/SAR) methodology, augmented by linear energy relationship (LER) and/or barrier height grouping (BHG) approximations for evaluation of the reaction barrier heights. The parameters needed have been derived from DFT calculations at M06-2X/aug-cc-pVTZ level for a training set of 23 reactions, involving hydrogen abstraction by O2 molecule at primary, secondary, and tertiary carbon sites. The reference reaction rate constant C2H6 + O2 → C2H5 + HO2 was obtained by extrapolation of the simplest reaction within the title family CH4 + O2 → CH3 + HO2. Kinetic parameters of the later one, calculated from canonical variational transition state theory (CVT), were taken from literature. The influence of low-frequency internal rotations has been investigated in details. The error analysis shows that the average systematic error of RC-TST/SAR-derived rate constants at low temperatures is within 25% compared to the explicit RC-TST results and diminishes at higher temperatures. This suggests that the proposed methodology can be effectively implemented in the automated mechanism generation codes to create the fuel combustion mechanisms.
KeywordsH abstraction by O2 Thermal rate constants On-the-fly kinetics Combustion Reaction class transition state theory
The authors would like to thank the Computational Center of the University of Bialystok (Grant GO-008) for providing access to the supercomputer resources and the GAUSSIAN 09 program.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict(s) of interest.
- 1.Battin-Leclerc F, Curran H, Faravelli T, Glaude PA (2013) Specificities related to detailed kinetic models for the combustion of oxygenated fuels components. Chapter 4. In: Battin-Leclerc F, Simmie JM, Edward Blurock E (eds) Cleaner Combustion: Developing Detailed Chemical Kinetic Models. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 93–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Srinivasan NK, Michael JV, Harding LB, Klippenstein SJ (2007) Experimental and theoretical rate constants for CH4 + O2 → CH3 + HO2. Combust Flame 149(1):104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2006.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Branko R, Reinhardt EP, von Gregor L, Deepti K, Alexander B, David L, David M, Albert FW (2005) Active thermochemical tables: thermochemistry for the 21st century. J Phys Conf Ser 16(1):561Google Scholar
- 8.Falconer WE, Knox JH, Trotman-Dickenson AF (1961) Competitive oxidations. Part II. The lower alkanes and cyclopropane. J Chem Soc:782–791Google Scholar
- 9.Pelucchi M, Cavallotti C, Faravelli T, Klippenstein SJ (2018) H-Abstraction reactions by OH, HO2, O, O2 and benzyl radical addition to O2 and their implications for kinetic modelling of toluene oxidation. Phys Chem Chem Phys 20(16):10607–10627. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP07779C CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Sabbe MK, De Vleeschouwer F, Reyniers M-F, Waroquier M, Marin GB (2008) First principles based group additive values for the gas phase standard entropy and heat capacity of hydrocarbons and hydrocarbon radicals. J Phys Chem A 112(47):12235–12251. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp807526n CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Wang H, Xu R, Wang K, Bowman CT, Hanson RK, Davidson DF, Brezinsky K, Egolfopoulos FN (2018) A physics-based approach to modeling real-fuel combustion chemistry - I. Evidence from experiments, and thermodynamic, chemical kinetic and statistical considerations. Combust Flame 193:502–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.03.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery Jr JA, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL (2009) Gaussian 09 Rev. E. Wallingford, CTGoogle Scholar
- 25.Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2008) The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor Chem Accounts 120(1):215–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Van de Vijver R, Vandewiele NM, Bhoorasingh PL, Slakman BL, Seyedzadeh Khanshan F, Carstensen H-H, Reyniers M-F, Marin GB, West RH, Van Geem KM (2015) Automatic mechanism and kinetic model generation for gas- and solution-phase processes: a perspective on best practices, recent advances, and future challenges. Int J Chem Kinet 47(4):199–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20902 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Oehlschlaeger MA, Davidson DF, Hanson RK (2006) Investigation of the reaction of toluene with molecular oxygen in shock-heated gases. Combust Flame 147(3):195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2006.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar