Advertisement

Structural Chemistry

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 1505–1516 | Cite as

The story of gas-phase electron diffraction (GED) in Norway

  • Kari KvesethEmail author
Original Research
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

This commentary is addressing gas electron diffraction in Norway from the late 1930s up to 2017. The account is about the people involved, the methods developed, and the chemical questions addressed. The development was based on three strong characteristics: Academic excellence, a holistic strategy, and a comprehensive international cooperation and publication. Two strong personalities—Odd Hassel and Otto Bastiansen—established the fundament; their contributions were pivotal. Their ability to obtain funding, to recruit highly qualified co-workers, and their international network were central to the development. The investments in structure chemistry and electron diffraction were exceptionally visionary and daring. The story is rather unique. It is about how a small university at Europe’s periphery in the late 1930s was able to establish a world-leading research group.

Keywords

Gas electron diffraction Structural chemistry Conformation analysis Odd Hassel Otto Bastiansen 

Notes

Acknowledgements

In writing this article, I have received invaluable information as well as constructive comments and additions from emeriti professors Edgeir Benum, Kolbjørn Hagen, Arne Haaland, Svein Samdal, and Hans Martin Seip. My sincere thanks go to them all for their contributions. My sincere thanks also go to Editor in Chief Istvan Hargittai for his thorough comments, suggestions and corrections, and to Professor Claus J. Nielsen for his thorough suggestions and corrections of the language used in the article. All photos in this article are from the Museum for the history of the university and science: the photo base, at UiO, (MUV) https://www.muv.uio.no/samlinger/fotobase/. My thanks go in particular to Anne Vaalund (MUV) for collecting important pictures bringing life to the story. All scientific figures and pictures are from the Norwegian GED lab’s archives. In particular, I will express my sincere gratitude to the Department of Chemistry, UiO, for engaging me in organizing a variety of activities related to the story of electron diffraction.

Funding information

This study received financial support from the Department of Chemistry, UiO.

References

  1. 1.
    Hassel O (1970) Cycloheksanproblemet (The Cyclohexane problem). Tidsskrift for Kjemi, Bergv.,Metall. 3 (1943) 32 (in Norwegian. Republished and translated to English in Kjemi, Bergv.,Metall. Bd 30, nr 5A:22–27Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    See also articles (in Norwegian): Titan; https//Titan.uio.no/node/2331, https//Titan.uio.no/node/2332 and www.kjemidigital.no: Kjemi 02 (2018) 16–25, Kjemi 03 (2018) 18–26
  3. 3.
    Andersen P, Bastiansen O, Furberg S, eds. (1967) Selected topics in structural chemistry. UniversitetsforlagetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Trine Nickelsen (2011) Nobel Prize winner built himself up research environment he needed. Apollon (in Norwegian), UiOGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A charge-transfer complex (CT complex) or electron-donor-acceptor complex is an association of two or more molecules, or of different parts of one large molecule, in which a fraction of electronic charge is transferred between the molecular entitiesGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hassel O (1970) Structural aspects of interatomic charge-transfer bonding. Science 170:497–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Trætteberg M (1998) Dedication in memoriam Professor Otto Christian Astrup Bastiansen (1918-1995). J Mol Structure 445:ix–xiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Evaluation reports: 1. Norwegian Research Council for Science and the Humanities (NAVF): International Evaluations of Norwegian Chemistry and Physics: Research using Diffraction Techniques (1986) (only Structural Chemistry) ISBN 827216–323-3, 2. The Research Council of Norway (NFR): Chemistry Research at Norwegian Universities and Colleges, A Review (1997) ISBN 82–12–01000-7 and 3. The Research Council of Norway (NFR): Review of Basic Chemistry Research in Norway (2009) ISBN 978–82–12-02629-2Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Academy and industry, Chemistry education and research at NTNU through 100 years (in Norwegian). Fagbokforlaget (ISBN: 978-82-450-1828-8) 2015, p. 378–410Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs
  11. 11.
    See articles in Under Dusken (in Norwegian) (Studentersamfunnet i Trondheim) 1958Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Basic research. The fundament of the modern society (in Norwegian). The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, Yearbook (1981)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Finbak C, Hassel O (1941) Arch f Math. und Naturw BxLV nr 3Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gudmundsen JC, Hassel O (1938). Z Phys Chem, Abt 40:326Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hassel O, Taarland T (1940). Tidsskrift for Kjemi, Bergv., Metall 20:167Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bastiansen O, Kveseth K, Møllendal H (1979) Structure of molecules with large amplitude motion as determined from electron-diffraction studies in the gas phase. Top Curr Chem 81:99–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bastiansen O (1985) The Norwegian gas electron diffraction group. J Mol Struct 128Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haaland A (1979) Molecular structure and bonding in the 3d metallocenes. Acc Chem Res (11):415–422Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Haaland A (1989) Covalent versus dative bonds to main group metals, a useful distinction. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 28:992–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bohn RK, Haaland A (1966) On the molecular structure of ferrocene. J Organometal Chem 5:470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Clinton J. Davisson and George P (1928) Thomson shared in 1937 the Nobel Prize in Physics “for their experimental discovery of the diffraction of electrons by crystals.” (Davisson, C. J. , Germer L.H.: Reflection of electrons by a crystal of nickel, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 14(4) 317–322Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    This instrument is shown in the exhibition about electron diffraction in the foyer at the Department of chemistry, University of OsloGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bastiansen O, Hassel O, Risberg E (1955). Acta Chem Scand 9:232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bastiansen O, Graber R (1969). L Wegmann Balzers High Vacuum Report 25:1Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Benum E (2010) Work for acceptance: Hassel group and the international scientific community about 1945-1955 (in Norwegian). Historisk tidsskrift, Universitetsforlaget, Bind 89:573–602Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Seip HM, Strand TG, Stolevik R (1969) Least squares refinement and error analysis based on correlated electron diffraction intensities of gaseous molecules. Chem Phys Lett (8):617–623Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Andersen B, Seip HM, Strand TG, Stolevik R (1969). Acta Chem Scand 23:3224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stolevik R, Seip HM, Cyvin S (1972) A new, practical method of computing mean amplitudes of vibration and perpendicular amplitude correction coefficients. Chem Phys Lett 15:263–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morino Y, Cyvin SJ, Kuchitsu K, Iijima, T (1962) J Chem Phys. 36:1109. For example, the bending vibrations of the molecule that occurs between the O...O in CO2, which is concidered a linear molecule, make the O...O distance appears smaller than the sum of the two C-O distances Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Seip HM (1967) Studies on the failure of the first born approximation in electron diffraction. Ph.D.,UiOGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations