Computational design of tetrahedral silsesquioxane-based porous frameworks with diamond-like structure as hydrogen storage materials
- 360 Downloads
- 6 Citations
Abstract
A novel type of three-dimensional (3D) tetrahedral silsesquioxane-based porous frameworks (TSFs) with diamond-like structure was computationally designed using the density functional theory (DFT) and classical molecular mechanics (MM) calculations. The hydrogen adsorption and diffusion properties of these TSFs were evaluated by the methods of grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The results reveal that all designed materials possess extremely high porosity (87–93 %) and large H2 accessible surface areas (5,268–6,544 m2 g−1). Impressively, the GCMC simulation results demonstrate that at 77 K and 100 bar, TSF-2 has the highest gravimetric H2 capacity of 29.80 wt%, while TSF-1 has the highest volumetric H2 uptake of 65.32 g L−1. At the same time, the gravimetric H2 uptake of TSF-2 can reach up to 4.28 wt% at the room temperature. The extraordinary performances of these TSF materials in hydrogen storage made them enter the rank of the top hydrogen storage materials so far.
Keywords
Porous material Hydrogen storage Grand canonical Monte Carlo Self-diffusivityNotes
Acknowledgments
H. Zhang acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC. Grant No. 11074176 and NSAF. Grant No. 10976019) and the support from Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (Grant No. 20100181110080). X.L. Cheng acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSAF. Grant No.11176020). The computational resources utilized in this research were provided by Shanghai Supercomputer Center.
References
- 1.Chu S (2009) Science 325:1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Ma S, Zhou HC (2010) Chem Commun 46:44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Dillon AC, Jones KM, Bekkedahl TA, Kiang CH, Bethune DS, Heben MJ (1997) Nature 386:377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Steele BCH, Heinzel A (2001) Nature 414:345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Züttel A (2003) Mater Today 6:24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Eberle U, Felderhoff M, Schuth F (2009) Angew Chem Int Ed 48:6608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Ströbel R, Garche J, Moseley PT, Jörissen L, Wolf G (2006) J Power Sources 159:781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Schlapbach L, Zuttel A (2001) Nature 414:353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Jena P (2011) J Phys Chem Lett 2:206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Sastre G (2010) Theor Chem Acc 127:259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Rowsell JL, Yaghi OM (2005) Angew Chem Int Ed 44:4670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Tylianakis E, Klontzas E, Froudakis GE (2011) Nanoscale 3:856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Han SS, Furukawa H, Yaghi OM, Goddard WA (2008) J Am Chem Soc 130:11580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Cooper AI (2009) Adv Mater 21:1291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Sun Y, Ben T, Wang L, Qiu S, Sun H (2010) J Phys Chem Lett 1:2753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Ben T, Ren H, Ma S, Cao D, Lan J, Jing X, Wang W, Xu J, Deng F, Simmons JM, Qiu S, Zhu G (2009) Angew Chem Int Ed 48:9457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Mastalerz M (2012) Chem—A Eur J 18:10082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Yang Q, Zhong C (2009) Langmuir 25:2302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Klontzas E, Tylianakis E, Froudakis GE (2008) J Phys Chem C 112:9095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Klontzas E, Tylianakis E, Froudakis GE (2010) Nano Lett 10:452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Sagara T, Ortony J, Ganz E (2005) J Chem Phys 123:214707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Farha OK, Yazaydin AO, Eryazici I, Malliakas CD, Hauser BG, Kanatzidis MG, Nguyen ST, Snurr RQ, Hupp JT (2010) Nat Chem 2:944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Li XD, Zhang H, Tang YJ, Cheng XL (2012) Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:2391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Cha MH, Nguyen MC, Lee YL, Im J, Ihm J (2010) J Phys Chem C 114:14276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.El-Kaderi HM, Hunt JR, Mendoza-Cortes JL, Cote AP, Taylor RE, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM (2007) Science 316:268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Eddaoudi M, Kim J, Rosi N, Vodak D, Wachter J, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM (2002) Science 295:469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Lan J, Cao D, Wang W, Ben T, Zhu G (2010) J Phys Chem Lett 1:978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Schwab JJ, Lichtenhan JD (1998) Appl Organomet Chem 12:707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Lichtenhan J (1996) Silsesquioxane-based polymers. In: Salamone JC (ed) Polymeric materials encyclopedia, vol 10. CRC Press, New York, p 7768Google Scholar
- 30.Kannan RY, Salacinski HJ, Butler PE, Seifalian AM (2005) Acc Chem Res 38:879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Waddon AJ, Zheng L, Farris RJ, Coughlin EB (2002) Nano Lett 2:1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Haddad TS, Viers BD, Phillips SH (2001) J Inorg Organomet Polym 11:155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Jeon HG, Mather PT, Haddad TS (2000) Polym Int 49:453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Kim Y, Koh K, Roll MF, Laine RM, Matzger AJ (2010) Macromolecules 43:6995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Peng Y, Ben T, Xu J, Xue M, Jing X, Deng F, Qiu S, Zhu G (2011) Dalton Trans 40:2720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Chaikittisilp W, Sugawara A, Shimojima A, Okubo T (2010) Chem Mater 22:4841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Marcolli C, Laine P, Bühler R, Calzaferri G, Tomkinson J (1997) J Phys Chem B 101:1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Studio M. DMol3 and Forcite, 4.0 edn. Accelrys Inc, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
- 39.Ramsden SJ, Robins V, Hyde ST (2009) Acta Crystallogr Sect A 65:81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Ramsden SJ, Robins V, Hyde ST, Hungerford S EPINET: Euclidean Patterns in Non-Euclidean Tilings. http://epinet.anu.edu.au/
- 41.Perdew JP, Wang Y (1992) Phys Rev B 45:13244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Sun H (1998) J Phys Chem B 102:7338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Rigby D, Sun H, Eichinger BE (1997) Polym Int 44:311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Buch V (1994) J Chem Phys 100:7610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Mayo SL, Olafson BD, Goddard WA (1990) J Phys Chem 94:8897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Gupta A, Chempath S, Sanborn MJ, Clark LA, Snurr RQ (2003) Mol Simul 29:29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Peng DY, Robinson DB (1976) Ind Eng Chem Fundam 15:59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Myers A, Monson P (2002) Langmuir 18:10261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.Frost H, Duren T, Snurr RQ (2006) J Phys Chem B 110:9565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.Snurr RQ, Bell AT, Theodorou DN (1993) J Phys Chem 97:13742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 51.Skoulidas AI, Sholl DS (2005) J Phys Chem B 109:15760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.Skoulidas AI (2004) J Am Chem Soc 126:1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.Liu B, Yang Q, Xue C, Zhong C, Smit B (2008) Phys Chem Chem Phys 10:3244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 54.Xue CY, Zhou Z, Liu B, Yang QY, Zhong CL (2009) Mol Simul 35:373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 55.Babarao R, Jiang J (2008) Langmuir 24:5474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 56.Verlet L (1968) Phys Rev 165:201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 57.Verlet L (1967) Phys Rev 159:98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 58.Plimpton S (1995) J Comput Phys 117:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 59.Cao D, Lan J, Wang W, Smit B (2009) Angew Chem Int Ed 48:4730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 60.Bondi A (1964) J Phys Chem 68:441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 61.Rouquerol J, Avnir D, Fairbridge C (1994) Pure Appl Chem 66:1739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 62.Furukawa H, Ko N, Go YB, Aratani N, Choi SB, Choi E, Yazaydin AO, Snurr RQ, O’Keeffe M, Kim J, Yaghi OM (2010) Science 329:424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 63.Palgunadi J, Kim HS, Lee JM, Jung S (2010) Chem Eng Process 49:192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 64.Zhou L, Zhou YP (1996) Ind Eng Chem Res 35:4166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 65.van den Berg AWC, Areán CO (2008) Chem Commun:668Google Scholar