Advertisement

Strength of Materials

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 156–165 | Cite as

Optimal Design of Failure-Censored Constant-Stress Life Test Plans for the Inverse Weibull Distribution

  • Ali A. IsmailEmail author
  • A. Al Tamimi
Article
  • 18 Downloads

This paper presents the optimal design of constant-stress partially accelerated life tests (CSPALT) using type-II censored data from the inverse Weibull distribution. The maximum likelihood approach is applied to estimate the distribution parameters and the corresponding factor. In addition, the corresponding confidence interval estimates are obtained. Moreover, optimal CSPALT plans are developed using the D-optimality criterion. That is, the proportion of test units that should be allocated to run under accelerated condition is optimally determined. This proportion is obtained such that the generalized asymptotic variance of the maximum likelihood estimators of the model parameters is minimized. To illustrate the theoretical results presented in this paper, simulation studies are conducted.

Keywords

reliability inverse Weibull distribution constant stress maximum likelihood estimation Fisher information matrix generalized asymptotic variance optimum test plans 

References

  1. 1.
    D. S. Bai and S. W. Chung, “Optimal design of partially accelerated life tests for the exponential distribution under type-I censoring,” IEEE T. Reliab., 41, No. 3, 400–406 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. S. Bai, S. W. Chung, and Y. R. Chun, “Optimal design of partially accelerated life tests for the lognormal distribution under type-I censoring,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 40, No. 1, 85–92 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. A. Ismail, A. A. Abdel-Ghaly, and E. H. El-Khodary, “Optimum constant-stress life test plans for Pareto distribution under type-I censoring,” J. Stat. Comput. Sim., 81, No. 12, 1835–1845 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ali A. Ismail, “Estimating the generalized exponential distribution parameters and the acceleration factor under constant stress partially accelerated life testing with type-II censoring,” Strength Mater., 45, No. 6, 693–702 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ali A. Ismail, “On designing constant-stress partially accelerated life tests under time-censoring,” Strength Mater., 46, No. 1, 132–139 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. A. Ismail and A. A. Al-Babtain, “Planning failure-censored constant stress partially accelerated life test for Pareto distribution of the second kind,” J. Syst. Eng. Electron., 26, No. 3, 644–650 (2015).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ali A. Ismail, “Bayesian estimation under constant-stress partially accelerated life tests for Pareto distribution with type-I censoring,” Strength Mater., 47, No. 4, 633–641 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ali A. Ismail and A. Al Tamimi, “Optimum constant-stress partially accelerated life test plans using type-I censored data from the inverse Weibull distribution,” Strength Mater., 49, No. 6, 847–855 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Nelson, Applied Life Data Analysis, Wiley, New York (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Drapella, “The complementary Weibull distribution: unknown or just forgotten?”, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 9, No. 4, 383–385 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Jiang, D. N. P. Murthy, and P. Ji, “Models involving two inverse Weibull distributions,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 73, No. 1, 73–81 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. A. Vander Wiel and W. Q. Meeker, “Accuracy of approx confidence bounds using censored Weibull regression data from accelerated life tests,” IEEE T. Reliab., 39, No. 3, 346–351 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. S. Bai, J. G. Kim, and Y. R. Chun, “Design of failure-censored accelerated life-test sampling plans for lognormal and Weibull distributions,” Eng. Optimiz., 21, No. 3, 197–212 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. C. Cohen, “Maximum likelihood estimation in the Weibull distribution based on complete and on censored samples,” Technometrics, 7, No. 4, 579–588 (1965).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cairo University, Faculty of Economics & Political Science, Department of StatisticsGizaEgypt
  2. 2.Prince Sattam Bin Abdul Aziz University, College of Science and Humanities StudiesHotat Bani TamimSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations