Advertisement

Strength of Materials

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 145–155 | Cite as

Influence of H2S Corrosion on Tensile Properties and Fracture Toughness of X80 Pipeline Steel

  • L. Gu
  • J. WangEmail author
  • C. B. Luan
  • X. Y. Li
Article
  • 8 Downloads

Tensile and fracture properties of X80 pipeline steel were studied in a mimic petrochemical environment. X80 pipeline steel specimens were firstly exposed to air or H2S corrosive medium. Then their tensile properties and δ-∆a resistance curves were obtained in experiments. The influence of H2S corrosion on the X80 pipeline steel’s crack growth resistance curve, fracture toughness, and plastic work loss was analyzed. The comparison between the test results after two pretreatments indicates that there was no significant difference in the X80 pipeline steel’s ultimate tensile strength before and after H2S corrosion. But fracture elongation, area reduction and fracture toughness varied greatly (a substantial decrease in elongation and reduction of area). The crack growth resistance curve of the specimen in air was obviously higher than the crack growth resistance curve of the corroded one. Under stable crack growth stage, the crack initiation toughness δ 0.2BL of the specimen in air was 0.732 mm, 2.02 times that of the corroded one (0.364 mm). In the case of similar crack growth ∆a, the plastic work required in the crack growing process (UP) of the specimen in air was 2.29 times that of the H2S-corroded specimen (\( {U}_P^{\hbox{'}} \) ). H2S corrosion resulted in a significant reduction of the fracture toughness of X80 pipeline steel. Hence, H2S corrosion should be avoided in the process of natural gas transportation by pipelines, so as to protect the pipeline steel from toughness degradation.

Keywords

X80 pipeline steel tensile properties resistance curve fracture toughness H2S corrosion 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article is supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (Project No. 2016YFC0801905-16).

References

  1. 1.
    L. Zheng and S. Gao, “Research and trial production of X80 pipeline steel with high toughness using acicular ferrite,” Engineering, 3, No. 3, 91–94 (2005).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Sosa and J. Alvarez-Ramirez, “Time-correlations in the dynamics of hazardous material pipelines incidents,” J. Hazard. Mater., 165, Nos. 1–3, 1204–1209 (2009).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. L. Alamilla, M. A. Espinosa-Medina, and E. Sosa, “Modelling steel corrosion damage in soil environment,” Corros. Sci., 51, No. 11, 2628–2638 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. T. Xi, D. X. Liu, H. P. Cai, et al., “Stress corrosion cracking behavior of domestic X80 pipeline steel in H2S environment,” Corros. Sci. Prot. Technol., 19, No. 2, 103–105 (2007).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Y. Wang, L. X. Huo, Y. F. Zhang, and D. P. Wang, “H2S stress corrosion test of welded joint for X80 pipeline steel,” Pres. Ves. Technol., 23, No. 7, 15–18 (2006).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Chen, J. Y. Fei, B. H. Wan, and L. Wang, “Stress corrosion crack of buried X80 oil pipeline and its protection,” Hot Work. Technol., 40, No. 22, 55–59 (2011).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    GB/T 228.1-2010. Metallic Materials – Tensile Testing – Part 1: Method of Test at Room Temperature, Chinese National Standard (2010).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    GB/T 21143-2007. Metallic Materials – Unified Method of Test for Determination of Quasistatic Fracture Toughness, Chinese National Standard (2007).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    NACE TM0177-2005. Laboratory Testing of Metals for Resistance to Sulfide Stress Cracking and Stress Corrosion Cracking in H 2 S Environments, NACE International (2005).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    NACE MR0175-2003. Standard Material Requirements – Metals for Sulfide Stress Cracking and Stress Corrosion Cracking Resistance in Sour Oilfield Environments, NACE International (2003).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    NACE TM0284-2011. Evaluation of Pipeline and Pressure Vessel Steels for Resistance to Hydrogen-Induced Cracking, NACE International (2011).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Y. Wang, J. Wang, S. Q. Zheng, et al., “Effect of H2S/CO2 partial pressure ratio on the tensile properties of X80 pipeline steel,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energ., 40, No. 35, 11925–11930 (2015).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Depover, E. Van den Eeckhout, and K. Verbeken, “Hydrogen induced mechanical degradation in tungsten alloyed steels,” Mater. Charact., 136, 84–93 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    GB/T 8650-2015. Evaluation of Pipeline and Pressure Vessel Steels for Resistance to Hydrogen-Induced Cracking, Chinese National Standard (2016).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. Chen, Q. G. Cai, and R. Z. Wang, Engineering Fracture Mechanics [in Chinese], National Defense Industry Press, Beijing (1977).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Q. F. Li, Fracture Mechanics and the Engineering Application [in Chinese], Harbin Engineering University Press, Harbin (2007).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    W. Y. Chu, L. J. Qiao, J. X. Li, et al., Hydrogen Embrittlement and Stress Corrosion Cracking [in Chinese], Science Press, Beijing (2013).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Q. Hong and Y. X. Chen, “Effects of static and dynamic hydrogen charging on tensile properties of SM490B clean steel,” Shanghai Met., 34, No. 1, 25–28, 37 (2012).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Wang, X. Y. Li, and Y. L. Zhang, “Low cycle fatigue crack growth rate in H2S environments,” J. Mech. Strength, 31, No. 3, 972–978 (2009).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. A. de Araújo, F. L. Bastian, and E. M. Castrodeza, “CTOD-R curves of the metal-clad interface of API X52 pipes cladded with an Inconel 625 alloy by welding overlay,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. M., 39, No. 12, 1477–1487 (2016).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    ASTM E1820-01. Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2001).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. V. Chatzidouros, V. J. Papazoglou, T. E. Tsiourva, and D. I. Pantelis, “Hydrogen effect on fracture toughness of pipeline steel welds, with in situ hydrogen charging,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energ., 36, No. 19, 12626–12643 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Electronics TechnologyBeijing University of TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations