Strength of Materials

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 102–112 | Cite as

Fatigue Strength and Life Prediction of a MAR-M247 Nickel-Base Superalloy Gas Turbine Blade with Multiple Carbide Inclusions

  • H. Lin
  • H. P. GengEmail author
  • Y. Y. Zhang
  • H. Li
  • X. Y. Liu
  • X. F. Zhou
  • L. Yu

Casting of a gas turbine blade from MAR-M247 nickel-base superalloy is followed by multiple carbide precipitates as a result of solidification. The microstructure of carbide was established with scanning electron microscopy and energy spectrum analysis. A finite element model simulating the blade with a random carbide precipitate is constructed using ANSYS software, and stress-strain evaluation is performed. The blade operation conditions are realized in a vibratory-tensile combined test setup with stress measurements using strain gauges arranged on different parts of the blade. The respective von Mises equivalent stresses obtained in simulation and test measurements are found to be comparable and can be used to assess the blade fatigue life based on the available fatigue curves and Palmgren–Miner rule of damage accumulation. Simulation and experimental results are the basis for plotting the relationship between the volumetric ratio of precipitates in the blade and its fatigue life. The results obtained at room temperature can; be extrapolated to the elevated ones to provide more reliable prediction of the superalloy blade fatigue and creep-fatigue life values.


fatigue strength MAR-M247 nickel-base superalloy gas turbine blade carbide precipitates fatigue life prediction Translated from Problemy Prochnosti, No. 1, pp. 115 – 126, January – February, 2019. 



This work was supported by National Program on Key Basic Research Projects of China (No. 2013CB03570401), High-Tech Ship Research Project of Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (No. MIIT[2017]614) and Key Research and Development Project in Shaanxi Province of China (Grant No. 2017ZDXM-GY-054).


  1. 1.
    T. J. Carter, “Common failures in gas turbine blades,” Eng. Fail. Anal., 12, No. 2, 237–247 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Poursaeidi, M. Aieneravaie, and M. R. Mohammadi, “Failure analysis of a second stage blade in a gas turbine engine,” Eng. Fail. Anal., 15, No. 8, 1111–1129 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Z. Mazur, A. Luna-Ramirez, J. A. Juárez-Islas, and A. Campos-Amezcua, “Failure analysis of a gas turbine blade made of Inconel 738LC alloy,” Eng. Fail. Anal., 12, No. 3, 474–486 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. N. Yoon, M. S. Kang, N. K. Jung, et al., “Failure analysis of the defect-induced blade damage of a compressor in the gas turbine of a cogeneration plant,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Man., 13, No. 5, 717–722 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    X. B. Zhao, L. Liu, C. B. Yang, et al., “Advance in research of casting defects of directionally solidified nickel-based single superalloys,” J. Mater. Eng., No. 1, 93–98 (2012).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. H. Xie and Q. J. Meng, “Numerical model for steam turbine blade fatigue life,” J. Xi’an Jiaotong Univ., 36, No. 9, 912–915 (2002).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. J. Sun and X. J. Yan, “New characteristics of fatigue-creep tests on serration of turbine blades,” J. Aerospace Power, 22, No. 3, 419–424 (2007).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    X. J. Yan and J. X. Nie, “New experimental approach in determining creep/fatigue life of directionally solidified alloy turbine blade,” J. Aerospace Power, 20, No. 6, 925–931 (2005).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Lin, H. P. Geng, and X. F. Zhou, “Stress characteristic study of heavy-duty gas turbine blade under centrifugal load,” J. Mech. Eng., 53, No. 22, 212–218 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. S. Whitesell and R. A. Overfelt, “Influence of solidification variables on the microstructure, macrosegregation, and porosity of directionally solidified MAR-M247,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 318, Nos. 1–2, 264–276 (2001).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. R. Liu, T. Jin, N. R. Zhao, et al., “Effect of carbon additions on the microstructure in a Ni-base single crystal superalloy,” Mater. Lett., 58, Nos. 17–18, 2290–2294 (2004).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    X. Yan, X. Chen, R. Sun, et al., “Investigation on material’s fatigue property variation among different regions of directional solidification turbine blades – Part I: Fatigue tests on full-scale blades,” J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 136, No. 10, 102502 (2014), doi:
  13. 13.
    H. Lin, H. Geng, H. Li, et al., “Effects of thermal and mechanical combined load on blade stress and fatigue life characteristic,” in: Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Mechatronics and Automation (August 6–9, 2017, Takamatsu, Japan), IEEE (2017), pp. 1348–1353.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    I. Rychlik, “A new definition of the rainflow cycle counting,” Int. J. Fatigue, 9, No. 2, 119–121 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. M. Muzakkir, K. P. Lijesh, and H. Hirani, “Tribological failure analysis of a heavily-loaded slow speed hybrid journal bearing,” Eng. Fail. Anal., 40, 97–113 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. Lin, H. Geng, X. Zhou, et al., “High cycle fatigue analysis of third stage blade based on shroud gap effect,” in: Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Mechatronics and Automation (August 7–10, 2016, Harbin, China), IEEE (2016), doi:
  17. 17.
    M. Šmid, L. Kunz, P. Hutař, and K. Hrbáček, “High cycle fatigue of nickel-based superalloy MAR-M 247 at high temperatures,” Procedia Engineer., 74, 329–332 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Lin
    • 1
    • 2
  • H. P. Geng
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Y. Y. Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • H. Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • X. Y. Liu
    • 3
  • X. F. Zhou
    • 2
  • L. Yu
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical StructuresXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  3. 3.Dongfang Turbine Co. Ltd.DeyangChina

Personalised recommendations