Advertisement

Strength of Materials

, Volume 50, Issue 5, pp 687–694 | Cite as

FEM Analysis and Experimental Study on the Bending Strength of Ceramic Tiles with the Top- and Back-Sided Polyurea Coating

  • K. Kamonchaivanich
  • K. Kuboyama
  • T. Ougizawa
SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL SECTION
  • 35 Downloads

Mechanical properties enhancement of ceramic tiles by a simple coating technique using polyurea was investigated. Solventless polyurea coatings were employed. The effect of coating sides of the ceramic substrate and film thickness on the mechanical properties were examined in three-point bend tests. The back-coated ceramic tile demonstrated a significant improvement in bending strength (by 25–50%) as compared to the top-coated one. The stress distribution in the substrate was analyzed by the finite element method, and the mechanism of improving mechanical properties was discussed. Based on FEM analysis, the polyurea back-coating appeared to be more effective as regards the stress distribution. The stress distribution in the back-coated ceramic tile is more uniform due to the cushioning effect of the supporting pins. The mechanism of the polyurea coating effect was evaluated in the experiment and finite element analysis. It was established that the stress distribution due to the polyurea coating was of importance for the improvement of the bending strength of substrates.

Keywords

polyurea coating ceramic tile bending strength stress distribution finite element analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    K.-F. Torges and D. J. Primeaux II, “Cast polyurea elastomers, application, processing and performance,” in: UTECH’94, Paper 42, Netherlands Congress Center, Den Hague (1994), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. J. Primeaux II, Polyurea Elastomer Technology: History, Chemistry & Basic Formulating Techniques, Primeaux Associates LLC, Texas (2004).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. A. Tracton, Coating Technology Handbook, Third edition, CRC Press, New York, (2005).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. Rijensky and D. Rittel, “Polyurea coated aluminum plates under hydrodynamic loading: Does side matter?” Int. J. Impact Eng., 98, 1–12 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Ackland, C. Anderson, and T. D. Ngo, “Deformation of polyurea-coated steel plates under localised blast loading,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 51, 13–22 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. Gardner, E. Wang, P. Kumar, and A. Shukla, “Blast mitigation in a sandwich composite using graded core and polyurea interlayer,” Exp. Mech., 52, 119–133 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. G. Wang, H. Q. Ren, X. Y. Wu, and C. L. Cai, “Effect of polyurea reinforced masonry walls for blast loads,” in: Advances in Energy, Environment and Materials Science: Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. on Energy, Environment and Materials Science (EEMS 2016, July 29–31, 2016, Singapore), CRC Press, New York (2016), pp. 331–338.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ASTM C1161-13. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperature, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2013).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Hafeez and M. Arif, Engineering Practical Book Vol-II: Basic Mechanics and Science of Materials, eBooks2go Inc. (2011).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. W. Davidge, Mechanical Behaviour of Ceramics, Cambridge, New York (1979).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. N. Greaves, A. L. Greer, R. S. Lakes, and T. Rouxel, “Poisson’s ratio and modern materials,” Nat. Mater., 10, 823–837 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. Orlov, “Computer simulation of optimal thickness of polyurea coating using for trenchless renovation of potable water pipes,” Procedia Engineer., 165, 1168–1175 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    E. C. Teixeira, J. R. Piascik, B. R. Stoner, and J. Y. Thompson, “Effect of YSZ thin film coating thickness on the strength of a ceramic substrate,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 83B, 459–463 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Gross and T. Seelig, Fracture Mechanics: With an Introduction to Micromechanics, Chapter 2, Springer, Berlin (2011).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    I. N. Koukoulis, C. G. Provatidis, and S. Georgiou, “Finite element modelling of the mechanical effects of the UV laser ablation of polymer coatings,” J. Appl. Surf. Sci., 254, 3531–3539 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Ahmad, Handbook of Optomechanical Engineering, CRC Press, New York (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. L. Norton, Machine Design: An Integrated Approach, Pearson Prentice Hall, New York (1996).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. W. Freiman and J. J. Mecholsky, Jr., The Fracture of Brittle Materials Testing and Analysis, John Willy & Sons, New Jersey (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and Materials ScienceTokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations