On the distribution of preliminary stresses and the optimal shape of an anchor joint for reinforced concrete
Article
Received:
- 20 Downloads
Abstract
By the methods of mathematical simulation and optimization, we determine the optimal geometry of the anchor with regard for its action upon reinforced concrete.
Keywords
methods of optimization and mathematical simulation anchor reinforced concretePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.N. N. Malinin, Applied Theory of Plasticity and Creep [in Russian], Mashinovedenie, Moscow (1975).Google Scholar
- 2.K. J. Willam and E. D. Warnke, “Constitutive model for the triaxial behavior of concrete,” in: Proc. Int. Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (Bergamo, Italy) (1975), Vol. 19, pp. 174–179.Google Scholar
- 3.J. L. Cohoin, Multi-Objective Programming and Planning, Academic Press, New York (1978).Google Scholar
- 4.R. Fletcher and C. Reeves, “Function minimization by conjugate gradients,” Computer J., 7, 149–154 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.G. Strang and G. Fix, An Analysis of the Finite Element Method, Prentice-Hall, New York (1973).Google Scholar
- 6.E. L. Wilson, R. L. Taylor, W. P. Doherty, and J. Ghaboussi, “Incompatible displacement models,” in: S. J. Fenves (Ed.), Numerical and Computer Methods in Structural Mechanics, Academic Press, New York (1973), pp. 43–57.Google Scholar
- 7.R. L. Taylor, P. J. Beresford, and E. L. Wilson, “A non-conforming element for stress analysis,” Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng., 10, 1211–1219 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.J. S. Przemieniecki, Theory of Matrix Structural Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York (1968).Google Scholar
- 9.K. J. Bathe, Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1996).Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007