A comparison of estimators for regression models with change points
- 689 Downloads
We consider two problems concerning locating change points in a linear regression model. One involves jump discontinuities (change-point) in a regression model and the other involves regression lines connected at unknown points. We compare four methods for estimating single or multiple change points in a regression model, when both the error variance and regression coefficients change simultaneously at the unknown point(s): Bayesian, Julious, grid search, and the segmented methods. The proposed methods are evaluated via a simulation study and compared via some standard measures of estimation bias and precision. Finally, the methods are illustrated and compared using three real data sets. The simulation and empirical results overall favor both the segmented and Bayesian methods of estimation, which simultaneously estimate the change point and the other model parameters, though only the Bayesian method is able to handle both continuous and dis-continuous change point problems successfully. If it is known that regression lines are continuous then the segmented method ranked first among methods.
KeywordsChange point Jump discontinuities MCMC Grid-search Segmented regression
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- MacNeill, I.B., Mao, Y.: Change-point analysis for mortality and morbidity rate. In: Sinha, B., Rukhin, A., Ahsanullah, M. (eds.) Applied Change Point Problems in Statistics, pp. 37–55 (1995) Google Scholar
- Muggeo, V.M.R.: Segmented: an R package to fit regression models with broken-line relationships. News. R Proj. 8(1), 20–25 (2008) Google Scholar
- Zhou, H.L., Liang, K.Y.: On estimating the change point in generalized linear models. In: IMS Collections Beyond Parametrics in Interdisciplinary Research: Festschrift in Honor of Professor Pranab K. Sen, vol. 1, pp. 305–320 (2008) Google Scholar