Bayesian estimation for percolation models of disease spread in plant populations
- 298 Downloads
Statistical methods are formulated for fitting and testing percolation-based, spatio-temporal models that are generally applicable to biological or physical processes that evolve in spatially distributed populations. The approach is developed and illustrated in the context of the spread of Rhizoctonia solani, a fungal pathogen, in radish but is readily generalized to other scenarios. The particular model considered represents processes of primary and secondary infection between nearest-neighbour hosts in a lattice, and time-varying susceptibility of the hosts. Bayesian methods for fitting the model to observations of disease spread through space and time in replicate populations are developed. These use Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to overcome the problems associated with partial observation of the process. We also consider how model testing can be achieved by embedding classical methods within the Bayesian analysis. In particular we show how a residual process, with known sampling distribution, can be defined. Model fit is then examined by generating samples from the posterior distribution of the residual process, to which a classical test for consistency with the known distribution is applied, enabling the posterior distribution of the P-value of the test used to be estimated. For the Rhizoctonia-radish system the methods confirm the findings of earlier non-spatial analyses regarding the dynamics of disease transmission and yield new evidence of environmental heterogeneity in the replicate experiments.
KeywordsSpatio-temporal modeling Stochastic modelling Fungal pathogens Bayesian inference Markov chain Monte Carlo
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bailey D.J., Otten W., and Gilligan C.A. 2000. Percolation, heterogeneity and the saprotrophic invasion of soil by the fungal plant pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. New Phytol. 146: 535–544.Google Scholar
- Deacon J.W. 1980. Introduction to Modern Mycology. Blackwells Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Gibson G.J. 1997b. Investigating mechanisms of spatio-temporal epidemic spread using stochastic models. Phytopathology 87: 138–146.Google Scholar
- Gottwald T.R., Gibson G.J., Garnsey S.M., and Irey M. 1999. Examination of the effect of aphid vector population composition on the spatial dynamics of citrus tristeza virus spread via stochastic modeling. Phytopathology 89: 603–608.Google Scholar
- Kleczkowski A., Bailey D.J., and Gilligan C.A. 1996. Dynamically generated variability in plant-pathogen systems with biological control. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 777–783.Google Scholar
- O’Neill P.D. and Roberts G.O. 1999. Bayesian inference for partially observed stochastic epidemics. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. A 162: 121–129.Google Scholar
- Otten W., Filipe J.A.N., Bailey D.J., and Gilligan, C. A. 2003. Quantification and analysis of transmission rates for soil-borne epidemics. Ecology 84: 3232–3239.Google Scholar
- Otten W., Filipe J.A.N., and Gilligan C.A. 2005. Damping-off epidemics, contact structure, and disease transmission in mixed-species populations. Ecology 86: 1948–1957.Google Scholar
- Silvey S.D. 1970. Statistical Inference. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
- Wissel C. 2000. Grid-based models as tools for ecological research. In Diekmann, U., Law, R. and Metz, J.A.J. (Eds.) The Geometry of Spatial Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press. pp. 94–115.Google Scholar