Statistics and Computing

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 53–60 | Cite as

Rotation tests

Article

Abstract

This paper describes a generalised framework for doing Monte Carlo tests in multivariate linear regression. The rotation methodology assumes multivariate normality and is a true generalisation of the classical multivariate tests—any imaginable test statistic is allowed. The generalised test statistics are dependent on the unknown covariance matrix. Rotation testing handles this problem by conditioning on sufficient statistics.

Compared to permutation tests, we replace permutations by proper random rotations. Permutation tests avoid the multinormal assumption, but they are limited to relatively simple models. On the other hand, a rotation test can, in particular, be applied to any multivariate generalisation of the univariate F-test.

As an important application, a detailed description of how each single response p-value can be non-conservatively adjusted for multiplicity is given. This method is exact and non-conservative (unlike Bonferroni), and it is a generalisation of the ordinary F-test (except for the computation by simulations). Hence, this paper offers an exact Monte Carlo solution to a classical problem of multiple testing.

Keywords

conditional inference multiple testing random orthogonal matrix adjusted p-value multiple endpoints spherical distribution microarray data analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agresti, A. 2001. Exact inference for categorical data: Recent advances and continuing controversies. Statistics in Medicine 20:2709–2722.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, M.J. 2001. Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:626–639.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, T.W., Olkin, I., and Underhill, L.G. 1987. Generation of random orthogonal matrices. Siam Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 8:625–629.Google Scholar
  4. Cheng, R.C.H. 1985. Generation of multivariate normal samples with given sample mean and covariance matrix. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 21:39–49.Google Scholar
  5. Curtis, M.L. 1979. Matrix Groups. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Dempster, A.P. 1969. Elements of Continuous Multivariate Analysis. Addison-Wesley Reading Mass.Google Scholar
  7. Edgington, E.S. 1995. Randomization Tests, 3rd edition. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Engen, S. and Lillegård, M. 1997. Stochastic simulations conditioned on sufficient statistics. Biometrika 84:235–240.Google Scholar
  9. Fang, K.T. and Anderson, T.W. 1990. Statistical inference in Elliptically Contoured and Related Distributions. Allerton Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Fang, K.T., Kotz, S., and Ng, K.W. 1990. Symmetric Multivariate and Related Distributions. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Fang, K.T. and Zhang, Y.T. 1990. Generalized Multivariate Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Fisher, R.A. 1935. The Design of Experiments, 8th edition 1966. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  13. Forsythe, A.B., Engelman, L., Jennrich, R., and May, P.R.A. 1973. A stopping rule for variable selection in multiple regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association 68:75–77.Google Scholar
  14. Ge, Y., Dudoit, S., and Speed, T.P. 2003. Resampling-based multiple testing for microarray data analysis (with discussion). Test 12:1–77.Google Scholar
  15. Genz, A. 1999. Methods for generating random orthogonal matrices. In: Niederreiter H. and Spanier J. (Eds.), Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 1998, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 199–213.Google Scholar
  16. Golub, T.R., Slonim, D.K., Tamayo, P., Huard, C., Gassenbeek, M., Mesirov, J.P., Coller, H., Loh, M.L., Downing, J.R., Caligiuri, M.A., Bloomfield, C.D., and Lander, E.S. 1999. Molecular classification of cancer: Class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 286:531–537.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Heiberger, R.M. 1978. Generation of random orthogonal matrices. Applied Statistics 27:199–206.Google Scholar
  18. James, A.T. 1954. Normal multivariate analysis and the orthogonal group. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 25:40–75.Google Scholar
  19. Langsrud, Ø 2002. 50–50 Multivariate analysis of variance for collinear responses. The Statistician 51:305–317.Google Scholar
  20. Langsrud, Ø. 2004. The geometrical interpretation of statistical tests in multivariate linear regression. Statistical Papers 45:111–122.Google Scholar
  21. Läuter, J., Glimm, E., and Kropf, S. 1996. New multivariate tests for data with an inherent structure. Biometrical Journal 38:5–23.Google Scholar
  22. Läuter, J., Glimm, E., and Kropf, S. 1998. Multivariate tests based on left-spherically distributed linear scores. The Annals of Statistics 26:1972–1988.Google Scholar
  23. Mardia, K.V., Kent, J.T., and Bibby, J.M. 1979. Multivariate Analysis. Academic Press Limited, London.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, A.J. 1984. Selection of subsets of regression variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 147:389–425.Google Scholar
  25. Olson, L. 1976. On choosing a test statistic in multivariate analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin 83:579–586.Google Scholar
  26. Shaffer, J.P. 1995. Multiple hypothesis testing. Annual Review of Psychology 46:561–584.Google Scholar
  27. Pitman, E.J.G. 1937a. Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any populations. Journal of Royal Statistical Society B 4:119–130.Google Scholar
  28. Pitman, E.J.G. 1937b. Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any populations II: The correlation coefficient. Journal of Royal Statistical Society B 4:225–232.Google Scholar
  29. Pitman, E.J.G. 1938. Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any populations III: The analysis of variance test. Biometrika 29:322–335.Google Scholar
  30. Strang, G. 1988. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 3rd edition. Harcourt Brace Javanovich, San Diego.Google Scholar
  31. Tanner, M.A. and Thisted, R.A. 1982. A remark on AS 127. Generation of random orthogonal matrices. Applied Statistics 31:190–192.Google Scholar
  32. Wedderburn, R.W.M. 1975. Random Rotations and Multivariate Normal Simulation, Research Report, Rothamsted Experimental Station.Google Scholar
  33. Westfall, P.H. and Young, S.S. 1993. Resampling-Based Multiple Testing: Examples and Methods for p-Value Adjustment. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MatforskNorway

Personalised recommendations