Advertisement

Sensing and Imaging

, 20:10 | Cite as

Performance of the Eye-Safe LRS and Color CCD Camera Under Aerosol Environments

  • Jai Wan ChoEmail author
  • Young Soo Choi
  • Kyung Min Jeong
Original Paper
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we performed an experiment to compare the observation performance of color CCD camera and the distance measurement characteristics of the eye-safe laser range scanner in a non-visible environment, which simulated atmospheric environments in the reactor building when a severe accident occurred at the nuclear power plant. For the comparison experiments, we fabricated a fog room. Fog particles are sprayed into the fog room until they reach a certain concentration at the time of the severe accident. In this paper, different methods are used to evaluate the performance of the camera and the eye-safe laser range scanner. To verify the observation performance of the color CCD camera under the dense aerosol environments, we calculated contrast from the observation image captured by the camera. And to evaluate characteristics of the eye-safe laser range scanner module, we reviewed the range measurement error under the same visibility constraint situations. In comparative tests, the CCD camera used is a general purpose model with a high magnification zoom lens. We evaluated a model with an effective measuring distance of 30 m, referring to the eye-safe laser range scanner module mounted on the Quince robot III. A visibility was introduced as quantitative evaluation parameter for comparing the monitoring performance of the color CCD camera and range measurement error of an eye-safe LRS module under aerosol environments where the fog particles are sprayed in the fog room. The visibility was calculated by attenuation of the He–Ne laser intensity in the fog room where the fog particles are being sprayed.

Keywords

Eye-safe LRS Color CCD camera Aerosol Severe accident Visibility distance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The funding was provided by National Research Foundation of Korea (Grant No. NRF-2012M2A8A1029350).

References

  1. 1.
    Nagatani, K. (2011) Redesign of rescue mobile robot Quince—Toward emergency response to the nuclear accident at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station on March 2011. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE international symposium on safety, security and rescue robotics, Kyoto, Japan, November 1–5, 2011.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    DARPA. DARPA robotics challenge finals 2015. http://www.theroboticschallenge.org/. Accessed 21 Oct 2015.
  3. 3.
    Chiba Institute of Technology. (2012). Accident response at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station by Quince robot, Ver 2 (Japanese). http://www.furo.org. Accessed 30 Nov 2012.
  4. 4.
    TEPCO. Application of robot technology (Japanese). http://www.tepco.co.jp/decommission/principles/technology/robot.html. Accessed 8 Jul 2011.
  5. 5.
    TEPCO. (2015). Investigation results of upper area of the pedestal grating region in the unit 1 reactor at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station (Japanese Presentation Material).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    TEPCO. (2015). Investigation results of PCV inside area in the unit 3 reactor at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station (Japanese Presentation Material).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    TEPCO.(2017). Pre-investigation results of X-6 penetration for the Unit 2 Primary Containment Vessel Investigation at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (Japanese).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wright, A. L., Wilson, J. H. Arwood, P. C. (1986). Pretest aerosol code comparisons for LWR aerosol containment tests LA1 and LA2. In 2nd international aerosol conference, September 1986.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Powers, D. A. A simplified model of aerosol scrubbing by a water pool overlying core debris interacting with concrete. NUREG/CR-5901.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nomoto, S. (1976). Variations of visibility (Japanese). Denki, 23(5), 5.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pilat, M. J. (1971). Comparison between the light extinction aerosol mass concentration relationship of atmospheric and air pollutant emission aerosols. Atmospheric Environment, 5, 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Donati, S., & Sona, A. (1969). Evaluation of visibility improvements in fog by the range gating technique. Opto-Electronics, 1, 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hokuyo Automatic Co. Scanning Laser Range Finder UTM-30LX/LN. http://www.hokuyo-aut.co.jp/. Accessed 1 May 2016.
  14. 14.
    Nikon Co. Interval timer photography, Nikon D5600 reference manual (complete instructions). https://downloadcenter.nikonimglib.com/en/products/351/D5600.html. Accessed 30 May 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nuclear Robot and Diagnosis TeamKorea Atomic Energy Research InstituteDaejeonKorea

Personalised recommendations