Asynchronous multi-process timed automata



High-quality asynchronous programs are needed urgently to exploit multi-core hardware and cloud platforms. However, in real-time systems, formal models such as timed automata (TAs) are limited to concurrent programs where the number of processes is constant and no process is triggered on-the-fly. To better support the verification of asynchronous programs, we propose a new model called asynchronous multi-process timed automata (APTAs) based on TAs. Processes are abstracted as process timed automata (PTAs), which are almost the same as TAs except some states are for triggering new processes. A multiset is used to buffer triggered instances. The model is sufficiently expressive to describe real-time asynchronous programs with dynamic process creation. We show that the coverability problem, which is used for checking safety property of programs, is decidable by encoding it into read-arc timed Petri nets (RTPNs). We then propose an algorithm for the coverability problem and provide a proof of the termination and correctness.


Asynchronous multi-process timed automata Coverability Read-arc timed Petri nets Timed automata 



This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61672340, 61472238, and 61472240).


  1. Abdulla, P.A., Cerans, K., Jonsson, B., & Tsay, Y.-K. (1996). General decidability theorems for infinite-state systems. In Proceedings of the 11th symposium on logic in computer science, (LICS’96), (pp. 313–321). IEEE Society.Google Scholar
  2. Abdulla, P.A., & Jonsson, B. (2001). Ensuring completeness of symbolic verification methods for infinite-state systems. Theoretical Computer Science, 256(1–2), 145–167.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Abdulla, P.A., & Nylén, A. (2001). Timed petri nets and BQOs. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on application and theory of petri nets (ICATPN’01), (pp. 53–70). Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Alur, R., Benedikt, M., Etessami, K., Godefroid, P., Reps, T.W., & Yannakakis, M. (2005). Analysis of recursive state machines. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS), 27(4), 786–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alur, R., & Dill, D.L. (1994). A Theory of timed automata. Theoretical Computer Science, 126(2), 183–235.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Behrmann, G., David, A., & Larsen, K.G. (2004). A tutorial on UPPAAL. In Proceedings of the international school on formal methods for the design of computer, communication and software systems (SFM-RT’04), (pp. 200–236). Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Benerecetti, M., Minopoli, S., & Peron, A. (2010). Analysis of timed recursive state machines. In Proceedings of the 17th international symposium on temporal representation and reasoning (TIME’10), (pp. 61–68). IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  8. Benerecetti, M., & Peron, A. (2016). Timed recursive state machines: timed recursive state expressiveness and complexity. Theoretical Computer Science, 625, 85–124.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Bengtsson, J., & Yi, W. (2003). Timed automata: semantics, algorithms and tools. In Proceedings of the lectures on concurrency and petri nets (LCPN’03), (pp. 87–124). Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Bérard, B., Cassez, F., Haddad, S., Lime, D.x, & Roux, O.H. (2005). Comparison of the expressiveness of timed automata and time petri nets. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on formal modeling and analysis of timed systems (FORMATS’05), (pp. 211–225). Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Bérard, B., Haddad, S., & Sassolas, M. (2012). Interrupt timed automata: verification and expressiveness. Formations Methods of System Design, 40(1), 41–87.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Berthomieu, B., & Diaz, M. (1991). Modeling and verification of time dependent systems using time petri nets. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 17(3), 259–273.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berthomieu, B., & Menasche, M. (1983). An enumerative approach for analyzing time petri nets. In Proceedings of the 9th world computer congress (IFIP’83), (pp. 41–46). IEEE.Google Scholar
  14. Bouyer, P., Haddad, S., & Reynier, P.-A. (2008). Timed petri nets and timed automata: on the discriminating power of Zeno sequences. Information and Computation, 206(1), 73–107.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Bouyer, P., Reynier, P.-A., & Haddad, S. (2006). Extended timed automata and time petri nets. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on application of concurrency to system design (ACSD’06), (pp. 91–100). IEEE Society.Google Scholar
  16. Byg, J., Jørgensen, K.Y., & Srba, J. (2009). An efficient translation of timed-arc petri nets to networks of timed automata. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on formal engineering methods (ICFEM’09), (pp. 698–716). Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Cassez, F., & Roux, O.H. (2006). Structural translation from time petri nets to timed automata. Journal of Systems and Software, 79(10), 1456–1468.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Esparza, J. (1997). Petri nets, commutative context-free grammars, and basic parallel processes. Fundamenta Informaticae, 31(1), 13–25.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Fang, B., Li, G., Sun, D, & Cai, H. (2016). Schedulability analysis of timed regular tasks by under-approximation on wcet. In Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on dependable software engineering, theories, tools, and applications (SETTA’16), (pp. 147–162). Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Fersman, E., Krcál, P., Pettersson, P., & Yi, W. (2007). Task automata: schedulability, decidability and undecidability. Information and Computation, 205(8), 1149–1172.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Fersman, E., Pettersson, P., & Yi, W. (2002). Timed automata with asynchronous processes: Schedulability and decidability. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on tools and algorithms for the construction and analysis of systems (TACAS’02), (pp. 67–82). Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Guan, N., Tang, Y, Abdullah, J., Stigge, M., & Yi, W. (2015). Scalable timing analysis with refinement. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on tools and algorithms for the construction and analysis of systems (TACAS’15), (pp. 3–18). Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Hopcroft, J., & Pansiot, J.-J. (1979). On the reachability problem for 5-dimensional vector addition systems. Theoretical Computer Science, 8(2), 135–159.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Karp, R.M., & Miller, R.E. (1969). Parallel program schemata. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 3(2), 147–195.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Larsen, K.G., Pettersson, P., & Yi, W. (1997). UPPAAL in a nutshell. STTT, 1(1-2), 134–152.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Li, G., Cai, X., Ogawa, M., & Yuen, S. (2013). Nested timed automata. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on formal modeling and analysis of timed systems (FORMATS’13), (pp. 168–182). Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Li, G., Ogawa, M., & Yuen, S. (2015). Nested timed automata with frozen clocks. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on formal modeling and analysis of timed systems (FORMATS’15), volume 9268 of lecture notes in computer science, (pp. 189–205). Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Norström, C., Wall, A., & Yi, W. (1999). Timed automata as task models for event-driven systems. In Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on real-time computing and applications symposium (RTCSA’99), (pp. 182–189). IEEE Society.Google Scholar
  29. Ruiz, V.V., De Frutos-Escrig, D., & Gomez, F.C. (1999). On nondecidability of reachability for timed-arc petri nets. In Proceedings of the 8th international workshop on petri nets and performance models (PNPM’99), (pp. 188–196). IEEE Society.Google Scholar
  30. Sen, K., & Viswanathan, M. (2006). Model checking multithreaded programs with asynchronous atomic methods. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on computer aided verification (CAV’06), (pp. 300–314). Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Srba, J. (2005). Timed-arc petri nets vs. networks of timed automata. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on applications and theory of petri nets (ICATPN’05), (pp. 385–402). Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Trivedi, A., & Wojtczak, D. (2010). Recursive timed automata. In Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on automated technology for verification and analysis (ATVA’10), volume 6252 of lecture notes in computer science, (pp. 306–324). Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of SoftwareShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Graduate School of Information Science and Electrical EngineeringKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations