Advertisement

My grade, my right: linking academic entitlement to academic performance

  • Bianca BertlEmail author
  • Denise Andrzejewski
  • Lynda Hyland
  • Anita Shrivastava
  • Douglas Russell
  • Jakob Pietschnig
Original Research

Abstract

The identification of determinants and correlates of academic entitlement is of particular interest for researchers and (academic) tutors alike. Whilst personality traits have been linked to academic entitlement in the past, the relative importance of familial influence remains unclear. Hence, to address this deficit, this study utilizes a sample of business and psychology undergraduates (N = 170) in the United Arab Emirates. Additionally, the impact of academic entitlement on students’ misestimation of coursework grades was assessed in a subsample of psychology undergraduates (N = 92). Multiple regression analyses revealed honesty–humility as the strongest predictor of academic entitlement, indicating lower entitlement of more honest students. In contrast, familial influences were unrelated to academic entitlement. Interestingly, higher entitled expectations were associated with larger overestimation of grades. Our findings indicate honesty–humility as an important driver of academic entitlement, whilst entitled expectations appear to be associated with misperceptions of students own academic performance.

Keywords

Academic entitlement Academic outcomes Grade estimation Personality Family influence 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of Middlesex University Dubai Ethics Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Abar, B., Carter, K. M., & Winsler, A. (2009). The effects of maternal parenting style and religious commitment on self-regulation, academic achievement, and risk behaviour among African-American parochial college students. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman, R. A., Witt, E. A., Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., Robins, R. W., & Kashy, D. A. (2010). What does the narcissistic personality inventory really measure? Assessment, 18, 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution, presented at World Conference on Higher Education, Paris, 2009. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
  4. Anaya, B., & Pérez-Edgar, K. (2019). Personality development in the context of individual traits and parenting dynamics. New Ideas in Psychology, 53, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 340–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO honesty–humility, agreeableness, and emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barton, A. L., & Hirsch, J. K. (2016). Permissive parenting and mental health in college students: Mediating effects of academic entitlement. Journal of American College Health, 64, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bellah, R. N. (1999). Freedom, coercion & authority. Academe, 85, 16–21.Google Scholar
  10. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning: What the student does (4th ed.). New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bonaccio, S., Reeve, C. L., & Lyerly, J. (2016). Academic entitlement: Its personality and general mental ability correlates, and academic consequences. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boswell, S. S. (2012). “I deserve success”: Academic entitlement attitudes and their relationships with course self-efficacy, social networking, and demographic variables. Social Psychology of Education, 15, 353–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bunce, L., Baird, A., & Jones, Sn E. (2017). The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 1958–1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bunzel, D. L. (2007). Universities sell their brands. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 16(2), 152–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cain, J., Romanelli, F., & Smith, K. M. (2012). Academic entitlement in pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carlo, G., Okun, M. A., Knight, G. P., & de Guzman, M. R. T. (2005). The interplay of traits and motives on volunteering: Agreeableness, extraversion, and prosocial value motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1293–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chowning, K., & Campbell, N. J. (2009). Development and validation of a measure of academic entitlement: Individual differences in students’ externalized responsibility and entitled expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 982–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Delucchi, M., & Korgen, K. (2002). “We’re the customer-We pay the tuition”: Student consumerism among undergraduate sociology majors. Teaching Sociology, 30, 100–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Emery, C., Kramer, T., & Tian, R. (2001). Customers vs. products: Adopting an effective approach to business students. Quality Assurance in Education Quality Assurance in Education, 9(2), 110–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Finney, T. G., & Finney, R. Z. (2010). Are students their universities’ customers? An exploratory study. Education and Training, 52(4), 276–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fouad, N. A., Cotter, E. W., Fitzpatrick, M. E., Kantamneni, L. C., & Bernfeld, S. (2010). Development and validation of the family influence scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 18, 276–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frisby, B. N., Goodboy, A. K., & Buckner, M. M. (2015). Students’ instructional dissent and relationships with faculty members’ burnout, commitment, satisfaction, and efficacy. Communication Education, 64, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gaughan, E. T., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2012). Examining the utility of general models of personality in the study of psychopathy: A comparison of the HEXACO-PI-R and NEO PI-R. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 513–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Givertz, M., & Segrin, C. (2014). The association between over-involved parenting and young adults’ self-efficacy, psychological entitlement, and family communication. Communication Research, 41, 1111–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gokcen, N. (2014). The rise of student consumerism. Psychologist, 27(12), 940–941.Google Scholar
  28. Greenaway, D., & Haynes, M. (2003). Funding higher education in the UK: The role of fees and loans. The Economic Journal, 113, F150–F166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Greenberger, E., Lessard, J., Chen, C., & Farruggia, S. P. (2008). Self-entitled college students: Contributions of personality, parenting, and motivational factors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 1193–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grubbs, J. B., & Exline, J. J. (2016). Trait entitlement: A cognitive-personality source of vulnerability to psychological distress. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 1204–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Houchins, J. (2016). Relationship of a measure of academic entitlement attributes to successful completion of a first nursing course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Capella University, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  32. Howard, J. M., Nicholson, B. C., & Chesnut, S. R. (2019). Relationships Between Positive Parenting, Overparenting, Grit, and Academic Success. Journal of College Student Development, 60, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keller, B. K., & Whiston, S. C. (2008). The role of parental influences on young adolescents’ career development. Journal of Career Assessment, 16, 198–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kitamura, T., Shikai, N., Uji, M., Hiramura, H., Tanaka, N., & Shono, M. (2009). Intergenerational transmission of parenting style and personality: Direct influence or mediation? Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18, 541–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kniest, P. (2018). Funding freeze & the higher education ice age. Advocate: Journal of the National Tertiary Education Union, 25, 22–24.Google Scholar
  36. Kopp, J., & Finney, S. J. (2013). Linking academic entitlement and student incivility using latent means modelling. Journal of Experimental Education, 81, 322–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kopp, J., Zinn, T. E., Finney, S. J., & Jurich, D. P. (2011). The development and evaluation of the academic entitlement questionnaire. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 44, 105–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the five-factor model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1571–1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lesnik-Oberstein, K. (2015). Let Uk Universities do what they do best—Teaching and research. The Guardian Letters. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/jul/06/let-uk-universities-do-what-they-do-best-teaching-and-research. Accessed 2 Apr 2019.
  40. McLellan, C. K., & Jackson, D. L. (2017). Personality, self-regulated learning, and academic entitlement. Social Psychology of Education, 20(1), 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mitchell, M., Leachman, M., & Masterson, K. (2016). Funding down, tuition up: State cuts to higher education threaten quality and affordability at public colleges. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.Google Scholar
  42. Noftle, E. E., & Robins, R. W. (2007). Personality processes and individual differences—Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big five correlates of GPA and SAT Scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  44. Patel, R., Tarrant, C., Bonas, S., Yates, J., & Sandars, J. (2015). The struggling student: A thematic analysis from the self-regulated learning perspective. Medical Education, 49, 417–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pryor, L. R., Miller, J. D., & Gaughan, E. T. (2008). A comparison of the psychological entitlement scale and the narcissistic personality inventory’s entitlement scale: Relations with general personality traits and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 517–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Symeou, M., & Georgiou, S. (2017). Externalizing and internalizing behaviours in adolescence, and the importance of parental behavioural and psychological control practices. Journal of Adolescence, 60, 104–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor, J. M., Bailey, S. F., & Barber, L. K. (2015). Academic entitlement and counterproductive research behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tomlinson, M. (2014). Exploring the impacts of policy changes on student attitudes to learning. York: Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
  49. Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2009). The narcissism epidemic: Living in the age of entitlement. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  50. Van den Akker, A. L., Deković, M., Asscher, J., & Prinzie, P. (2014). Mean-level personality development across childhood and adolescence: A temporary defiance of the maturity principle and bidirectional associations with parenting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 736–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Varghese, N. V. (2013). Globalization and higher education: Changing trends in cross border education. Analytical Reports in International Education, 5, 7–20.Google Scholar
  52. Wasieleski, D. T., Whatley, M. A., Briihl, D. S., & Branscome, J. M. (2014). Academic entitlement scale: Development and preliminary validation. Psychological Research, 4, 441–450.Google Scholar
  53. Waterman, E. A., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2017). Are mothers’ and fathers’ parenting characteristics associated with emerging adults’ academic engagement? Journal of Family Issues, 38, 1239–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weiss, L. H., & Schwarz, C. (1996). The relationship between parenting types and older adolescents’ personality, academic achievement, adjustment, and substance use. Child Development, 67, 2101–2114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wentzel, K. R. (1991). Social competence at school: Relation between social responsibility and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 61, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 56–75). Newbery Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Wetzel, E., & Robins, R. W. (2016). Are parenting practices associated with the development of narcissism? Findings from a longitudinal study of Mexican-origin youth. Journal of Research in Personality, 63, 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Whiston, S. C., & Keller, B. K. (2004). The influences of the family of origin on career development: A review and analysis. The Counseling Psychologist, 32, 493–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Williams, J. (2013). Consuming higher education: Why learning can’t be bought. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bianca Bertl
    • 1
    Email author
  • Denise Andrzejewski
    • 1
  • Lynda Hyland
    • 1
  • Anita Shrivastava
    • 1
  • Douglas Russell
    • 2
  • Jakob Pietschnig
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Science and TechnologyMiddlesex University DubaiDubaiUnited Arab Emirates
  2. 2.Institute of Child Protection StudiesAustralian Catholic UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Applied Psychology: Health, Development, Enhancement and Intervention, Faculty of PsychologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations