Advertisement

Are performance–avoidance goals always deleterious for academic achievement in college? The moderating role of social class

  • Alisée Bruno
  • Mickaël Jury
  • Marie-Christine Toczek-Capelle
  • Céline DarnonEmail author
Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Abundant research has shown that the endorsement of performance–avoidance goals in academic contexts is associated with negative outcomes, including poor academic achievement. The present study tests students’ social class as a moderator of the relationship between performance–avoidance goals and achievement. Two hundred thirty students (106 lower-class students and 124 upper-class students, Mage = 18.57, SD = 1.28) were asked to report the highest academic degree obtained by their mother and father and complete a performance–avoidance goal scale. Participants’ initial academic level was measured. In addition, depending on the condition, they were led to believe they had great (vs. poor) chances to succeed at the university. They then solved Advanced Progressive Matrices measuring their achievement. As expected, performance–avoidance goals negatively predicted achievement only for lower-class students, and this moderation mainly appeared for high academic achievers. The manipulation of the success versus failure expectancies did not moderate the effect. These results confirm that the adoption of performance–avoidance goals would be especially deleterious for lower-class students who succeed, supporting an interpretation in terms of the upward mobility process lower-class students achieve when succeeding in higher education.

Keywords

Performance–avoidance goals Achievement First generation College Upward mobility Social class 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Conseil Régional Auvergne Rhône Alpes.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. Amiot, C. E., Terry, D. J., Wirawan, D., & Grice, T. A. (2010). Changes in social identities over time: The role of coping and adaptation processes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(4), 803–826.  https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X480624.Google Scholar
  2. Arthur, W., Jr., & Day, D. V. (1994). Development of a short form for the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(2), 394–403.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164494054002013.Google Scholar
  3. Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 706–722.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.80.5.706.Google Scholar
  4. Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2003). Revisiting the benefits of performance–approach goals in the college classroom: Exploring the role of goals in advanced college courses. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(4–5), 357–374.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.004.Google Scholar
  5. Brodish, A. B., & Devine, P. G. (2009). The role of performance–avoidance goals and worry in mediating the relationship between stereotype threat and performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 180–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.005.Google Scholar
  6. Chalabaev, A., Major, B., Cury, F., & Sarrazin, P. (2009). Physiological markers of challenge and threat mediate the effects of performance-based goals on performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 991–994.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.009.Google Scholar
  7. Chalabaev, A., Major, B., Sarrazin, P., & Cury, F. (2012). When avoiding failure improves performance: Stereotype threat and the impact of performance goals. Motivation and Emotion, 36(2), 130–142.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9241-x.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, E., & Matthews, K. A. (2001). Cognitive appraisal biases: An approach to understanding the relation between socioeconomic status and cardiovascular reactivity in children. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 23(2), 101–111.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2302_4.Google Scholar
  9. Coutinho, S. A., & Neuman, G. (2008). A model of metacognition, achievement goal orientation, learning style and self-efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 11(2), 131–151.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-008-9042-7.Google Scholar
  10. Croizet, J. C., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(6), 588–594.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298246003.Google Scholar
  11. Darnon, B., & Butera, F. (2005). Buts d’accomplissement, stratégies d’étude, et motivation intrinsèque: présentation d’un domaine de recherche et validation française de l’échelle d’Elliot et McGregor (2001) [Achievement goals, study strategies, and intrinsic motivation: Presenting a domain of research and the French validation of Elliot and McGregor’s (2001) scale]. L’Année Psychologique, 105, 105–131.  https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.2005.3821.Google Scholar
  12. Darnon, C., Butera, F., Mugny, G., Quiamzade, A., & Hulleman, C. S. (2009). “Too complex for me!” Why do performance–approach and performance–avoidance goals predict exam performance? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(4), 423.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178759.Google Scholar
  13. Darnon, C., Jury, M., & Aelenei, C. (2018). Who benefits from mastery–approach and performance–approach goals in college? Students’ social class as a moderator of the link between goals and grade. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(4), 713–726.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0351-z.Google Scholar
  14. Deemer, E. D., Smith, J. L., Carroll, A. N., & Carpenter, J. P. (2014). Academic procrastination in STEM: Interactive effects of stereotype threat and achievement goals. The Career Development Quarterly, 62(2), 143–155.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2014.00076.x.Google Scholar
  15. DeRosa, E., & Dolby, N. (2014). “I don’t think the university knows me.”: Institutional culture and lower-income, first-generation college students. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 10(2). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0kj6m6r8.
  16. Destin, M., & Debrosse, R. (2017). Upward social mobility and identity. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 99–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.006.Google Scholar
  17. Dickhäuser, C., Buch, S. R., & Dickhäuser, O. (2011). Achievement after failure: The role of achievement goals and negative self-related thoughts. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 152–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.01.002.Google Scholar
  18. Dompnier, B., Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2013). When performance–approach goals predict academic achievement and when they do not: A social value approach. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 587–596.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12025.Google Scholar
  19. Durante, F., Tablante, C. B., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). Poor but warm, rich but cold (and competent): Social classes in the stereotype content model. Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 138–157.  https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12208.Google Scholar
  20. Durik, A. M., Lovejoy, C. M., & Johnson, S. J. (2009). A longitudinal study of achievement goals for college in general: Predicting cumulative GPA and diversity in course selection. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(2), 113–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.11.002.Google Scholar
  21. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040.Google Scholar
  22. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169–189.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3.Google Scholar
  23. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218.Google Scholar
  24. Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461–475.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461.Google Scholar
  25. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501.Google Scholar
  26. Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 613–628.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.613.Google Scholar
  27. Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632–648.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023952.Google Scholar
  28. Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5–12.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5.Google Scholar
  29. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878.Google Scholar
  30. Goudeau, S., & Croizet, J. C. (2017). Hidden advantages and disadvantages of social class: How classroom settings reproduce social inequality by staging unfair comparison. Psychological Science, 28(2), 162–170.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616676600.Google Scholar
  31. Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541–553.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541.Google Scholar
  32. Halabi, S., Dovidio, J. F., & Nadler, A. (2008). When and how do high status group members offer help: Effects of social dominance orientation and status threat. Political Psychology, 29(6), 841–858.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00669.x.Google Scholar
  33. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002a). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 638–645.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.638.Google Scholar
  34. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 316–330.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316.Google Scholar
  35. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002b). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 562–575.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.562.Google Scholar
  36. Howell, A. J., & Watson, D. C. (2007). Procrastination: Associations with achievement goal orientation and learning strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(1), 167–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.017.Google Scholar
  37. Huang, C. (2012). Discriminant and criterion-related validity of achievement goals in predicting academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 48–73.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026223.Google Scholar
  38. Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 422–449.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018947.Google Scholar
  39. Ivcevic, Z., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). The can and cannot do attitude: How self-estimates of ability vary across ethnic and socioeconomic groups. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 144–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.07.011.Google Scholar
  40. Jetten, J., Iyer, A., Tsivrikos, D., & Young, B. M. (2008). When is individual mobility costly? The role of economic and social identity factors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(5), 866–879.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.471.Google Scholar
  41. Jost, J. T., Gaucher, D., & Stern, C. (2015). The world isn’t fair”: A system justification perspective on social stratification and inequality. APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 317–340.  https://doi.org/10.1037/14342-012.Google Scholar
  42. Jury, M., Bruno, A., & Darnon, C. (2018). Doing better (or worse) than one’s parents: Social status, mobility, and performance–avoidance goals. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 659–674.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12210.Google Scholar
  43. Jury, M., Smeding, A., Court, M., & Darnon, C. (2015). When first-generation students succeed at university: On the link between social class, academic performance, and performance–avoidance goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 25–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.001.Google Scholar
  44. Jury, M., Smeding, A., Stephens, N. M., Nelson, J. E., Aelenei, C., & Darnon, C. (2017). The experience of low SES students in Higher Education: Psychological barriers to success and interventions to reduce social-class inequality. Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 23–41.  https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12202.Google Scholar
  45. Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. J. (2002). Should childhood be a journey of a race? Response to Harackiewicz et al. (2002). Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 646–648.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.646.Google Scholar
  46. Karabenick, S. A. (2003). Seeking help in large college classes: A person-centered approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(1), 37–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00012-7.Google Scholar
  47. Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Perceived achievement goal structure and college student help seeking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 569–581.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.569.Google Scholar
  48. Keys, T. D., Conley, A. M., Duncan, G. J., & Domina, T. (2012). The role of goal orientations for adolescent mathematics achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(1), 47–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.09.002.Google Scholar
  49. King, R. B. (2016). Is a performance–avoidance achievement goal always maladaptive? Not necessarily for collectivists. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 190–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.093.Google Scholar
  50. Kraus, M. W., Horberg, E. J., Goetz, J. L., & Keltner, D. (2011). Social class rank, threat vigilance, and hostile reactivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(10), 1376–1388.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.093.Google Scholar
  51. Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546–572.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028756.Google Scholar
  52. Kraus, M. W., & Stephens, N. M. (2012). A road map for an emerging psychology of social class. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(9), 642–656.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00453.x.Google Scholar
  53. Kudrna, L., Furnham, A., & Swami, V. (2010). The influence of social class salience on self-assessed intelligence. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 38(6), 859–864.  https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2010.38.6.859.Google Scholar
  54. Levin, S., Federico, C. M., Sidanius, J., & Rabinowitz, J. L. (2002). Social dominance orientation and intergroup bias: The legitimation of favoritism for high-status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 144–157.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202282002.Google Scholar
  55. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Tyson, D. F., & Patall, E. A. (2008). When are achievement goal orientations beneficial for academic achievement? A closer look at main effects and moderating factors. International Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 19–70.Google Scholar
  56. Lovejoy, C. M., & Durik, A. M. (2010). Self-handicapping: The interplay between self-set and assigned achievement goals. Motivation and Emotion, 34(3), 242–252.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9179-4.Google Scholar
  57. Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487–503.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258.Google Scholar
  58. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance–approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 77.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.77.Google Scholar
  59. Moller, A. C., & Elliot, A. J. (2006). The 2 × 2 achievement goal framework: An overview of empirical research. In A. Mittel (Ed.), Focus on educational psychology (pp. 307–326). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  60. Ostrove, J. M., & Long, S. M. (2007). Social class and belonging: Implications for college adjustment. The Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 363–389.  https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2007.0028.Google Scholar
  61. Poortvliet, P. M., & Darnon, C. (2010). Toward a more social understanding of achievement goals: The interpersonal effects of mastery and performance goals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(5), 324–328.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410383246.Google Scholar
  62. Ramos-Sánchez, L., & Nichols, L. (2007). Self-efficacy of first-generation and non-first-generation college students: The relationship with academic performance and college adjustment. Journal of College Counseling, 10(1), 6–18.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.2007.tb00002.x.Google Scholar
  63. Roussel, P., Elliot, A. J., & Feltman, R. (2011). The influence of achievement goals and social goals on help-seeking from peers in an academic context. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 394–402.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.003.Google Scholar
  64. Rubin, M. (2012). Working-class students need more friends at university: A cautionary note for Australia’s higher education equity initiative. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(3), 431–433.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.689246.Google Scholar
  65. Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2005). Regulation of achievement goals: The role of competence feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 320–336.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.320.Google Scholar
  66. Stephens, N. M., Brannon, T. N., Markus, H. R., & Nelson, J. E. (2015). Feeling at home in college: Fortifying school-relevant selves to reduce social class disparities in higher education. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9(1), 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12008.Google Scholar
  67. Stephens, N. M., Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Johnson, C. S., & Covarrubias, R. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178–1197.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027143.Google Scholar
  68. Urdan, T. (2004). Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement: Examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, and culture. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 251–264.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.251.Google Scholar
  69. Van Yperen, N. W., Blaga, M., & Postmes, T. (2014). A meta-analysis of self-reported achievement goals and nonself-report performance across three achievement domains (work, sports, and education). PLoS ONE, 9(4), e93594.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093594.Google Scholar
  70. Van Yperen, N. W., Blaga, M., & Postmes, T. (2015). A meta-analysis of the impact of situationally induced achievement goals on task performance. Human Performance, 28(2), 165–182.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2015.1006772.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive et Sociale, LAPSCO, UMR6024, CNRSUniversité Clermont AuvergneClermont-Ferrand CedexFrance
  2. 2.ACTE, EA4281, Université Clermont AuvergneClermont-Ferrand CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations